0
Research Papers

# Transient Analysis of Laser Ablation Process With Plasma Shielding: One-Dimensional Model Using Finite Volume Method

[+] Author and Article Information
Deepak Marla

Ph.D. Student
e-mail: deepakmarla@iitb.ac.in

Upendra V. Bhandarkar

Associate Professor
e-mail: bhandarkar@iitb.ac.in

Suhas S. Joshi

Professor
e-mail: ssjoshi@iitb.ac.in
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay,
Mumbai, India 400076

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Manufacturing Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF Micro AND Nano-Manufacturing. Manuscript received February 10, 2012; final manuscript received December 8, 2012; published online March 22, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Don A. Lucca.

J. Micro Nano-Manuf 1(1), 011007 (Mar 22, 2013) (9 pages) Paper No: JMNM-12-1014; doi: 10.1115/1.4023287 History: Received February 10, 2012; Revised December 08, 2012

## Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive transient model of various phenomena that occur during laser ablation of TiC target at subnanosecond time-steps. The model is a 1D numerical simulation using finite volume method (FVM) on a target that is divided into subnanometric layers. The phenomena considered in the model include: plasma initiation, uniform plasma expansion, plasma shielding of incoming radiation, and temperature dependent material properties. It is observed that, during the target heating, phase transformations of any layer occur within a few picoseconds, which is significantly lower than the time taken for it to reach boiling point ($~ns$). The instantaneous width of the phase transformation zones is observed to be negligibly small ($<5nm$). In addition, the width of the melt zone remains constant once ablation begins. The melt width decreases with an increase in fluence and increases with an increase in pulse duration. On the contrary, the trend in the ablation depth is exactly opposite. The plasma absorbs about 25–50% of the incoming laser radiation at high fluences ($20-40 J/cm2$), and less than 5% in the range of $5-10 J/cm2$. The simulated results of ablation depth on TiC are in good agreement at lower fluences. At moderate laser fluences ($10-25 J/cm2$), the discrepancy of the error increases to nearly ±7%. Under prediction of ablation depth by 15% at high fluences of $40 J/cm2$ suggests the possibility of involvement of other mechanisms of removal such as melt expulsion and phase explosion at very high fluences.

###### FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

## References

Choi, K. H., Masuzawa, M. J., and Kim, D., 2004, “Excimer Laser Micro-Machining for 3D Microstructure,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 149, pp. 561–566.
Schneider, M., Berthe, L., Fabbro, R., and Muller, M., 2008, “Measurement of Laser Absorptivity for Operating Parameters Characteristic of Laser Drilling Regime,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 41, p. 155502.
Cesaria, M., Caricato, A. P., Leggieri, G., Luches, A., Martino, M., Maruccio, G., Catalano, M., Manera, M. G., Rella, R., and Taurino, A., 2011, “Structural Characterization of Ultrathin Cr-Doped ITO Layers Deposited by Double-Target Pulsed Laser Ablation,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 44, p. 365403.
Ouyang, Z., Meng, L., Raman, P., Cho, T. S., and Ruzic, D. N., 2011, “Laser-Assisted Plasma Coating at Atmospheric Pressure: Production of Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia Thermal Barriers,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 44, p. 265202.
Jo, Y. K., and Wen, S.-B., 2011, “Direct Generation of Core/Shell Nanoparticles From Double-Pulse Laser Ablation in a Background Gas,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 44, p. 305301.
Singh, R., and Narayan, J., 1990, “Pulsed Laser Evaporation Technique for Depositing Thin Films: Physics and Theoretical Model,” Phys. Rev. B, 41, pp. 8843–8859.
Dabby, F., and Paek, U., 1972, “High Intensity Laser-Induced Vaporization and Explosion of Solid Material,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 8, pp. 106–111.
Conde, J. C., Lusquinos, F., Gonzalez, P., Serra, J., Dima, A., Cultrera, L., Guido, D., Zocco, A., and Perrone, A., 2004, “Finite Element Analysis of the Initial Stages of the Laser Ablation Process,” Thin Solid Films, 453-454, pp. 323–327.
Jeong, S., Greif, R., and Russo, R., 1998, “Numerical Modeling of Pulsed Laser Evaporation of Aluminum Targets,” Appl. Surf. Sci., 127-129, pp. 177–183.
Bulgakova, N., Bulgakov, A., and Babich, L., 2004, “Energy Balance of Pulsed Laser Ablation: Thermal Model Revised,” Appl. Phys. A, 79, pp. 1323–1326.
Wu, B., and Shin, Y., 2006 “Modelling of Nanosecond Laser Ablation With Vapor Plasma Formation,” J. Appl. Phys., 99, p. 084310.
Oliveira, V., and Vilar, R., 2007, “Finite Element Simulation of Pulsed Laser Ablation of Titanium Carbide,” Appl. Surf. Sci., 253, pp. 7810–7814.
Vasantgadkar, N., Bhandarkar, U., and Joshi, S., 2010, “A Finite Element Model to Predict the Ablation Depth in Pulsed Laser Ablation,” Thin Solid Films, 519, pp. 1421–1430.
Fang, R., Zhang, D., Li, Z., Yang, F., Li, L., Tan, X., Yang, F., and Sun, M., 2008, “Improved Thermal Model and Its Application in UV High-Power Pulsed Laser Ablation of Metal Target,” Solid State Commun., 145, pp. 556–560.
Bogaerts, A., Chen, Z., Gijbels, R., and Vertes, A., 2003, “Laser Ablation for Analytical Sampling: What Can We Learn From Modeling?,” Spectrochem Acta Part B, 58, pp. 1867–1893.
Marla, D., Bhandarkar, U., and Joshi, S., 2011, “Critical Assessment of the Issues in the Modeling of Ablation and Plasma Expansion Processes in the Pulsed Laser Deposition of Metals,” J. Appl. Phys., 109, p. 021101.
Chen, F. F., 1984, Introduction to Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Vol. 1: Plasma Physics, Plenum Press, New York.
Chen, Z., and Bogaerts, A., 2005, “Laser Ablation of Cu and Plume Expansion into 1 atm Ambient Gas,” J. Appl. Phys., 97, p. 063305.
Anisimov, S., Bauerle, D., and Luk'yanchuk, B., 1993, “Gas Dynamics and Film Profiles in Pulsed-Laser Deposition of Materials,” Phys. Rev. B, 48, pp. 12076–12081.
Oliveira, V., Simoes, F., and Vilar, R., 2005, “Column-Growth Mechanisms During KrF Laser Micromachining of Al2O3TiC Ceramics,” Appl. Phys. A, 81(6), pp. 1157–1162.
Stafe, M., Negutu, C., and Popescu, I. M., 2007, “Theoretical Determination of the Ablation Rate of Metals in Multiple-Nanosecond Laser Pulses Irradiation Regime,” Appl. Surf. Sci., 253, pp. 6353–6358.
Peterlongo, A., Miotello, A., and Kelly, R., 1994, “Laser-Pulse Sputtering of Aluminum: Vaporization, Boiling, Superheating, and Gas-Dynamic Effects,” Phys. Rev. E, 50, pp. 4716–4727.
Bulgakova, N., and Bulgakov, A., 2001, “Pulsed Laser Ablation of Solids: Transition From Normal Vaporization to Phase Explosion,” Appl. Phys. A, 73, pp. 199–208.
Bulgakov, A. V., and Bulgakova, N. M., 1998, “Gas-Dynamic Effects of the Interaction Between a Pulsed Laser-Ablation Plume and the Ambient Gas: Analogy With an Underexpanded Jet,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 31, pp. 693–703.
Kelly, R., and Miotello, A., 1996, “Comments on Explosive Mechanisms of Laser Sputtering,” Appl. Surf. Sci., 96-98, pp. 205–215.

## Figures

Fig. 1

Schematic of ablation process with plasma shielding effect

Fig. 2

Schematic showing the evaluation of plasma height

Fig. 3

Laser intensity profile with time

Fig. 4

Schematic showing the different stages of the target during the laser heating process. Where S, L, and V represent solid, liquid, and vapor, respectively.

Fig. 5

Transient temperature profiles of different layers along the depth for a pulse time of 10 ns (FWHM) and fluence of (a) 4 J/cm2, (b) 10 J/cm2, (c) 15 J/cm2, and (d) 20 J/cm2, where “i” represents the layer number

Fig. 6

Temperature variation along the depth for a pulse time of 10 ns (FWHM) and a fluence of (a) 4 J/cm2, (b) 10 J/cm2, (c) 15 J/cm2, and (d) 20 J/cm2

Fig. 7

Plot of ablation and melt depth for a fluence of 10 J/cm2

Fig. 8

Plot of ablation depth versus time for different fluences

Fig. 9

Plot of melt depth versus time for different fluences

Fig. 10

Plot of ablation depth as a function of time for different pulse times and fluence of 20 J/cm2

Fig. 11

Plot of melt width as a function of time for different pulse times and fluence of 20 J/cm2

Fig. 12

A comparison of laser intensities before and after plasma shielding for a fluence of (a) 5 J/cm2, (b) 10 J/cm2, (c) 20 J/cm2, and (d) 40 J/cm2

Fig. 13

Laser energy absorbed by plasma with time at different fluences

Fig. 14

Percentage of energy absorbed by plasma for different laser fluences

Fig. 15

Comparison of numerical results with the experimental results of Oliveira et al. [20]

## Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

### Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related Proceedings Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

• TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
• EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In