Research Papers

Stochastic Modeling of Microgrinding Wheel Topography

[+] Author and Article Information
Jacob A. Kunz

Graduate Research Assistant
e-mail: jacobakunz@gatech.edu

J. Rhett Mayor

Associate Professor
e-mail: rhett.mayor@me.gatech.edu
The George W. Woodruff School of
Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332

Contributed by the Manufacturing Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MICRO- AND NANO-MANUFACTURING. Manuscript received May 4, 2012; final manuscript received March 3, 2013; published online May 2, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Hitoshi Ohmori.

J. Micro Nano-Manuf 1(2), 021004 (May 02, 2013) (11 pages) Paper No: JMNM-12-1028; doi: 10.1115/1.4024002 History: Received May 04, 2012; Revised March 03, 2013

Superabrasive microgrinding wheels are used for jig grinding of microstructures using various grinding approaches. The desire for increased final geometric accuracy in microgrinding leads to the need for improved process modeling and understanding. An improved understanding of the source of wheel topography characteristics leads to better knowledge of the interaction between the individual grits on the wheel and the grinding workpiece. Analytic stochastic modeling of the abrasives in a general grinding wheel is presented as a method to stochastically predict the wheel topography. The approach predicts the probability of the number of grits within a grind wheel, the individual grit locations within a given wheel structure, and the static grit density within the wheel. The stochastic model is compared to numerical simulations that imitate both the assumptions of the analytic model where grits are allowed to overlap and the more realistic scenario of a grind wheel where grits cannot overlap. A new technique of grit relocation through collective rearrangement is used to limit grit overlap. The results show that the stochastic model can accurately predict the probability of the static grit density while providing results two orders of magnitude faster than the numerical simulation techniques. It is also seen that grit overlap does not significantly impact the static grit density allowing for the simpler, faster analytic model to be utilized without sacrificing accuracy.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Malkin, S., and Guo, C., 2008, Grinding Technology: Theory and Applications of Machining With Abrasives, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Marinescu, I., Hitchiner, M., Uhlmann, E., and Inasaki, I., 2007, Handbook of Machining With Grinding Wheels, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Brinksmeier, E., Aurich, J., Govekar, E., Heinzel, C., Hoffmeister, H., Klocke, F., Peters, J., Rentsch, R., Stephenson, D., and Uhlmann, E., 2006, “Advances in Modeling and Simulation of Grinding Processes,” CIRP Ann.-Manuf. Technol., 55(2), pp. 667–696. [CrossRef]
Hou, Z., and Komanduri, R., 2003, “On the Mechanics of the Grinding Process-Part I. Stochastic Nature of the Grinding Process,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 43(15), pp. 1579–1593. [CrossRef]
Park, H., 2008, “Development of Micro-Grinding Mechanics and Machine Tools,” Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atalnta, GA.
Koshy, P., Jain, V., and Lal, G., 1993, “A Model for the Topography of Diamond Grinding Wheels,” Wear, 169(2), pp. 237–242. [CrossRef]
Koshy, P., Jain, V., and Lal, G., 1997, “Stochastic Simulation Approach to Modelling Diamond Wheel Topography,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 37(6), pp. 751–761. [CrossRef]
Gong, Y., Wang, B., and Wang, W. S., 2002, “The Simulation of Grinding Wheels and Ground Surface Roughness Based on Virtual Reality Technology,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 129(1), pp. 123–126. [CrossRef]
Hines, W. W., Montgomery, D. C., Goldsman, D. M., and Borror, C. M., 2003, Probability and Statistics in Engineering 4th Edition, Wiley.
Davis, C., 1974, “The Dependence of Grinding Wheel Performance on Dressing Procedure,” Int. J. Mach. Tool Des. Res., 14(1), pp. 33–52. [CrossRef]
Chen, X., and Rowe, W., 1996, “Analysis and Simulation of the Grinding Process. Part I: Generation of the Grinding Wheel Surface,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 36(8), pp. 871–882. [CrossRef]
He, D., Ekere, N., and Cai, L., 1999, “Computer Simulation of Random Packing of Unequal Particles,” Phys. Rev. E, 60(6), pp. 7098–7104. [CrossRef]
Chang, H. C., and Wang, J. J. J., 2008, “A Stochastic Grinding Force Model Considering Random Grit Distribution,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 48(12), pp. 1335–1344. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Grit position coordinate systems

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Summary of method for analytical calculation of number of grits in a grinding wheel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Bar representation of the intersection of grit i with a radial surface in a single-layered wheel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Sampling of possible locations of grit i with known diameter Di

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Bar representation of the intersection of grit i with a radial surface in a multi-layered wheel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Summary of method for analytical calculation of the probability of grit gi intersection a cylindrical surface with radius Rc

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Summary of method for analytical stochastic calculation of static grit density for microgrinding wheels

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Model of single-layered, spherical grit grinding wheel with a low concentration number, (b) diced grind pin with clean edge, and (c) end view of the diced pin

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Normal probability plot of the simulated number of grits required to fill a #1200 wheel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Relocation of a grit i that is overlapped by grit j [12]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Visualization of the relocating overlapping particle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

(a) Static grit density mean and (b) static grit density standard deviation from analytic and simulation models for a #220, 1 mm OD single-layered microgrinding wheel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

(a) Static grit density mean and (b) static grit density standard deviation from analytic and simulation models for a #1200, 1 mm OD multi-layered grinding wheel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Normal probability plot for a #1200 wheel at a radial distance of 439 μm from the wheel core




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In