0
Research Papers

Process Parameter Effects on Dimensional Accuracy of Micro-Injection Moulded Part

[+] Author and Article Information
M. R. Mani, J. Segal, S. Ratchev

Manufacturing Research Division,
Faculty of Engineering,
University of Nottingham,
Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK

R. Surace

ITIA-CNR,
Institute of Industrial Technology and Automation,
National Research Council, Bari 70124, Italy

I. Fassi

ITIA-CNR,
Institute of Industrial Technology and Automation,
National Research Council,
Bari 70124, Italy

Contributed by the Manufacturing Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF Micro- AND Nano-Manufacturing. Manuscript received September 12, 2012; final manuscript received July 18, 2013; published online August 12, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Liwei Lin.

J. Micro Nano-Manuf 1(3), 031003 (Aug 12, 2013) (8 pages) Paper No: JMNM-12-1056; doi: 10.1115/1.4025073 History: Received September 12, 2012; Received September 12, 2012; Revised July 18, 2013

Micro-injection moulding is becoming increasingly important among the available processes for production of micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) and microsystem technologies (MSTs), and higher number of polymer products is being manufactured by this process. Due to the sensitive nature of applications of this process, such as medical and aerospace applications, achieving high quality parts with high dimensional accuracy is crucial. In this work, a design of experiment (DoE) approach is used. The aim is to study the effects of three process parameters which are commonly used for research in this domain, on the dimensional accuracy of microchannels with different sizes; they are injection velocity, injection pressure, and melt temperature. The study focuses on two polymers, polyoxymethylene (POM) and liquid crystal polymer (LCP). Experimental results showed that higher melt temperature and injection pressure resulted in higher dimensional accuracy. Nevertheless, high settings for the three parameters resulted in higher percentage of flash in most cases. In conclusion, the most influential factors were shown to be melt temperature and injection pressure.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Picture of the mould (a) assembled mould (b) pin inserts

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematics of the channels on the pin

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Percentage flash for pins 1 and 2 LCP

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Percentage flash for pins 1 and 2 POM

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Dimensional error for pins 1 and 2 POM

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Dimensional error for pins 1 and 2 LCP

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

SEM images of pin 1A manufactured in (a) LCP (T = 330, V = 300, P = 600) and (b) POM (T = 230, V = 250, P = 700)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Samples of pin 1 manufactured in POM

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Measurement points for small (S) and large (L) dimensions of the channels and flash (F)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Main effect plot (a) and interaction plot (b) for dimensional error

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Pareto chart for dimensional error

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Main effect plot (a) and interaction plot (b) for flash

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Pareto chart for flash

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Melt viscosity comparison Vectra LCP versus semicrystalline polymers

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In