0
Research Papers

Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study of Tool Wear in Vibration Assisted Nano-Impact-Machining by Loose Abrasives

[+] Author and Article Information
Sagil James

Department of Mechanical and
Materials Engineering,
University of Cincinnati,
Cincinnati, OH 45221
e-mail: jamess5@mail.uc.edu

Murali M. Sundaram

Department of Mechanical
and Materials Engineering,
University of Cincinnati,
Cincinnati, OH 45221
e-mail: murali.sundaram@uc.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Manufacturing Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MICRO AND NANO-MANUFACTURING. Manuscript received September 25, 2013; final manuscript received October 3, 2014; published online October 30, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Bin Wei.

J. Micro Nano-Manuf 3(1), 011001 (Oct 30, 2014) (7 pages) Paper No: JMNM-13-1071; doi: 10.1115/1.4028782 History: Received September 25, 2013; Revised October 03, 2014

Vibration assisted nano-impact-machining by loose abrasives (VANILA) is a novel target specific nano-abrasive machining process wherein, nano-abrasives, injected in slurry between the workpiece and the vibrating atomic force microscope probe, impact the workpiece causing nanoscale material removal. In this study, a molecular dynamics (MD) based simulation approach is used to investigate the tool wear mechanism. The simulation results reveal that the tool wear is influenced by the impact velocity of the abrasive grains and the effective tool tip radius. It is seen that based on the process conditions, the wear process could happen through distinctive mechanisms such as atom-by-atom loss, plastic deformation, and brittle fracture. Experimental results show evidences of tool wear by aforementioned mechanisms in VANILA process.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of the VANILA process: (a) Tool striking the abrasive particle, (b) abrasive particle impacting workpiece surface, and (c) material removal from the workpiece.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

VANILA process machining results: (a) Pattern design, (b) AFM image of nanocavities machined on silicon substrate [2], (c) pattern design, and (d) AFM image of nanocavities machined on borosilicate glass substrate.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematic of MD simulation model used to study tool tip wear during VANILA process

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

MD simulation of tool wear in VANILA process: (a) before impact and (b) after impact

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Possible mechanisms of tool wear during VANILA process: (a) Atom-by-atom attrition, (b) ductile mode, and (c) radial cracking

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Tool wear mechanism map

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Number of atoms removed versus impact velocity

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Number of atoms removed versus abrasive grain size

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Number of atoms removed versus effective tip radius

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Tool tip showing wear zones

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

SEM images showing tool wear of silicon tips used in VANILA process: (a) Side view before machining, (b) bottom view before machining, (c) side view atom-by-atom loss, (d) bottom view atom-by-atom loss, (e) side view plastic deformation, (f) bottom view plastic deformation, (g) side view brittle fracture, and (h) bottom view brittle fracture.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In