0
Research Papers

Nanoparticle Sintering Model: Simulation and Calibration Against Experimental Data

[+] Author and Article Information
Obehi G. Dibua

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Texas at Austin,
Austin, TX 78712
e-mail: ogodibua@utexas.edu

Anil Yuksel

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Texas at Austin,
Austin, TX 78712
e-mail: anil.yuksel@utexas.edu

Nilabh K. Roy

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Texas at Austin,
Austin, TX 78712
e-mail: nilabh.roy@utexas.edu

Chee S. Foong

NXP Semiconductors,
Austin, TX 78735
e-mail: cs.foong@nxp.com

Michael Cullinan

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Texas at Austin,
Austin, TX 78712
e-mail: michael.cullinan@austin.utexas.edu

Contributed by the Manufacturing Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MICRO-AND NANO-MANUFACTURING. Manuscript received June 7, 2018; final manuscript received September 24, 2018; published online November 19, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Marriner Merrill.

J. Micro Nano-Manuf 6(4), 041004 (Nov 19, 2018) (9 pages) Paper No: JMNM-18-1017; doi: 10.1115/1.4041668 History: Received June 07, 2018; Revised September 24, 2018

One of the limitations of commercially available metal additive manufacturing (AM) processes is the minimum feature size most processes can achieve. A proposed solution to bridge this gap is microscale selective laser sintering (μ-SLS). The advent of this process creates a need for models which are able to predict the structural properties of sintered parts. While there are currently a number of good SLS models, the majority of these models predict sintering as a melting process which is accurate for microparticles. However, when particles tend to the nanoscale, sintering becomes a diffusion process dominated by grain boundary and surface diffusion between particles. As such, this paper presents an approach to model sintering by tracking the diffusion between nanoparticles on a bed scale. Phase field modeling (PFM) is used in this study to track the evolution of particles undergoing sintering. Changes in relative density are then calculated from the results of the PFM simulations. These results are compared to experimental data obtained from furnace heating done on dried copper nanoparticle inks, and the simulation constants are calibrated to match physical properties.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Govett, T. , Kim, K. , Lundin, M. , and Pinero, D. , 2012, “Design Rules for Selective Laser Sintering,” Mechanical Engineering Design Projects Program, The University of Texas, Austin, TX, accessed Oct. 19, 2018, https://www.me.utexas.edu/~ppmdlab/files/designers.guide.sls.pdf
Sager, B. , and Rosen, D. , 2002, Stereolithography Process Resolution, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
Roy, N. K. , Foong, C. S. , and Cullinan, M. A. , 2016, “ Design of a Micro-Scale Selective Laser Sintering System,” Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX, Aug. 8–10, pp. 1495–1508. http://sffsymposium.engr.utexas.edu/sites/default/files/2016/120-Roy.pdf
Roy, N. , Yuksel, A. , and Cullinan, M. , 2016, “ Design and Modeling of a Microscale Selective Laser Sintering System,” ASME Paper No. MSEC2016-8569.
Roy, N. , Dibua, O. , Foong, C. S. , and Cullinan, M. , 2017, “ Preliminary Results on the Fabrication of Interconnect Structures Using Microscale Selective Laser Sintering,” ASME Paper No. IPACK2017-74173.
Nelson, C. , McAlea, K. , and Gray, D. , 1995, “ Improvements in SLS Part Accuracy,” Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX, Aug. 7–9, pp. 159–169.
Dong, L. , Makradi, A. , Ahzi, S. , and Remond, Y. , 2009, “ Three-Dimensional Transient Finite Element Analysis of the Selective Laser Sintering Process,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 209(2), pp. 700–706. [CrossRef]
Moser, D. , Cullinan, M. , and Murthy, J. , 2016, “ Particle-Scale Melt Modeling of the Selective Laser Melting Process,” 27th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium—An Additive Manufacturing Conference, Austin, TX, Aug. 8–10, pp. 247–256. http://sffsymposium.engr.utexas.edu/sites/default/files/2016/017-Moser.pdf
Moser, D. , Fish, S. , Beaman, J. , and Murthy, J. , 2014, “ Multi-Layer Computational Modeling of Selective Laser Sintering Processes,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2014-37535.
Ko, S. H. , and Grigoropoulos, C. P. , 2008, “ The Solid-State Neck Growth Mechanisms in Low Energy Laser Sintering of Gold Nanoparticles: A Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 130(9), p. 092404. [CrossRef]
Ding, L. , Davidchack, L. R. , and Pan, J. , 2009, “ A Molecular Dynamics Study of Sintering Between Nanoparticles,” Comput. Mater. Sci., 45(2), pp. 247–256. [CrossRef]
Cheng, B. , and Ngan, H. W. A. , 2013, “ The Sintering and Densification Behavior of Many Copper Nanoparticles: A Molecular Dynamics Study,” Comput. Mater. Sci., 74, pp. 1–11. [CrossRef]
Rojek, J. , Nosewicz, S. , Pietrzak, K. , and Chmielewski, M. , 2013, “ Simulation of Powder Sintering Using a Discrete Element Model,” Acta Mechanica et Automatica, 7(3), pp. 175–179. [CrossRef]
Wang, U. Y. , 2006, “ Computer Modeling and Simulation of Solid-State Sintering: A Phase Field Approach,” Acta Mater., 54(4), pp. 953–961. [CrossRef]
Shinagawa, K. , 2014, “ Simulation of Grain Growth and Sintering Process by Combined Phase-Field/Discrete Element Method,” Acta Mater., 66, pp. 360–369. [CrossRef]
Kumar, V. , 2011, “ Simulations and Modeling of Unequal Sized Particles Sintering,” Ph. D. dissertation, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT. http://cdmbuntu.lib.utah.edu/utils/getfile/collection/etd3/id/273/filename/611.pdf
Moelans, N. , Blanpain, B. , and Wollants, P. , 2008, “ An Introduction to Phase-Field Modeling of Microstructure Evolution,” Comput. Coupling Phase Diagrams Thermochem., 32(2), pp. 268–294. [CrossRef]
Chockalingam, K. , Kouznetsova, V. G. , van der Sluis, O. , and Geers, M. G. D. , 2016, “ 2D Phase Field Modeling of Sintering of Silver Nanoparticles,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 312, pp. 492–508. [CrossRef]
Cahn, J. W. , and Hilliard, J. E. , 1958, “ Free Energy of a Nonuniform System—Part I: Interfacial Free Energy,” J. Chem. Phys., 28(2), pp. 258–267. [CrossRef]
Cahn, J. W. , 1961, “ On Spinodal Decomposition,” Acta Metall., 9(9), pp. 81–87.
Ginzburgh, V. L. , and Landau, L. D. , 1950, “ On the Theory of Superconductivity,” JETP, 20, pp. 1064–1082.
Yuksel, A. , and Cullinan, M. , 2016, “ Modeling of Nanoparticle Agglomeration and Powder Bed Formation in Microscale Selective Laser Sintering Systems,” Addit. Manuf., 12, pp. 204–215. [CrossRef]
Clark, I., 2017, “ CI-005_Data_Sheet_2017,” Intrinsiq Materials, Hampshire, UK.
Deng, J. , 2012, “ A Phase Field Model of Sintering With Direction-Dependent Diffusion,” Mater. Trans., 53(2), pp. 385–389. [CrossRef]
Zhang, D. , Weng, G. , Gong, S. , and Zhou, D. , 2003, “ The Kinetics of Initial Stage in Sintering Process of BaTiO3-Based PTCR Ceramics and Its Computer Simulation,” Mater. Sci. Eng. B, 99(1–3), pp. 88–92. [CrossRef]
Hoehne, K. , and Sizmann, R. , 1971, “ Volume and Surface Self-Diffusion Measurements on Copper by Thermal Surface Smoothing,” Phys. Status Solidi, 5(3), pp. 577–589. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The evolution of a one by one micrometer bed with 43 particles: (a) initial, (b) 20,000 timesteps (0.16 h), (c) 60,000 timesteps (0.47 h), (d) 100,000 timesteps (0.79 h), (e) 280,000 timesteps (2.2 h), (f) 450,000 timesteps (3.6 h), (g) 700,000 timesteps (5.5 h), (h) 850,000 timesteps (6.7 h), and (i) 1,100,000 timesteps (8.7 h)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Densification in the center of the simulation bed after (a) 0 timesteps, (b) 80,000 timesteps, (c) 160,000 timesteps, and (d) 480,000 timesteps

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Relative density curve, with error bounds, derived from data analysis done on the sintering simulation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Experimental procedure: (a) copper nanoparticle ink, (b) dried ink, (c) scraped off dried flakes, (d) pellets in crucible before sintering, and (e) pellets in crucible after sintering

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Scanning electron microscope images of sintered nanoparticles: (a) before sintering and (b) after sintering

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Experimental data and curve fit at (a) 450 °C, (b) 500 °C, (c) 550 °C, and (d) 600 °C

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Consolidation of experiment fit plots

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Distribution of the average initial density of the simulation and experiment for 12 simulation beds and 24 experiment samples

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Comparing experimental fit to simulations for (a) 450 °C, (b) 500 °C, and (c) 550 °C

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

The evolution of a two-by-two micrometer bed with 134 particles: (a) initial, (b) 200,000 timesteps (5.1 h), (c) 600,000 timesteps (15 h), (d) 1,000,000 timesteps (26 h), (e) 1,500,000 timesteps (38 h), and (f) 2,000,000 timesteps (51 h)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Relative change in density curve derived from data analysis done on a 2-by-2 micrometer bed and the prediction from a 1-by-1 micrometer bed

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In