Arm-free paraplegic standing via functional electrical stimulation (FES) has drawn much attention in the biomechanical field as it might allow a paraplegic to stand and simultaneously use both arms to perform daily activities. However, current FES systems for standing require that the individual actively regulates balance using one or both arms, thus limiting the practical use of these systems. The purpose of the present study was to show that actuating only six out of 12 degrees of freedom (12-DOFs) in the lower limbs to allow paraplegics to stand freely is theoretically feasible with respect to multibody stability and physiological torque limitations of the lower limb DOF. Specifically, the goal was to determine the optimal combination of the minimum DOF that can be realistically actuated using FES while ensuring stability and able-bodied kinematics during perturbed arm-free standing. The human body was represented by a three-dimensional dynamics model with 12-DOFs in the lower limbs. Nakamura’s method (Nakamura, Y., and Ghodoussi, U., 1989, “Dynamics Computation of Closed-Link Robot Mechanisms With Nonredundant and Redundant Actuators,” IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom., 5(3), pp. 294–302) was applied to estimate the joint torques of the system using experimental motion data from four healthy subjects. The torques were estimated by applying our previous finding that only 6 (6-DOFs) out of 12-DOFs in the lower limbs need to be actuated to facilitate stable standing. Furthermore, it was shown that six cases of 6-DOFs exist, which facilitate stable standing. In order to characterize each of these cases in terms of the torque generation patterns and to identify a potential optimal 6-DOF combination, the joint torques during perturbations in eight different directions were estimated for all six cases of 6-DOFs. The results suggest that the actuation of both ankle flexion∕extension, both knee flexion∕extension, one hip flexion∕extension, and one hip abduction∕adduction DOF will result in the minimum torque requirements to regulate balance during perturbed standing. To facilitate unsupported FES-assisted standing, it is sufficient to actuate only 6-DOFs. An optimal combination of 6-DOFs exists, for which this system can generate able-bodied kinematics while requiring lower limb joint torques that are producible using contemporary FES technology. These findings suggest that FES-assisted arm-free standing of paraplegics is theoretically feasible, even when limited by the fact that muscles actuating specific DOFs are often denervated or difficult to access.

1.
Veltink
,
P. H.
, and
Donaldson
,
N.
, 1998, “
A Perspective on the Control of FES-Supported Standing
,”
IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng.
1063-6528,
6
(
2
), pp.
109
112
.
2.
Jaeger
,
R. J.
, 1986, “
Design and Simulation of Closed-Loop Electrical Stimulation Orthoses for Restoration of Quiet Standing in Paraplegia
,”
J. Biomech.
0021-9290,
19
(
10
), pp.
825
835
.
3.
Khang
,
G.
, and
Zajac
,
F. E.
, 1989, “
Paraplegic Standing Controlled by Functional Neuromuscular Stimulation. I. Computer Model and Control-System Design
,”
IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.
0018-9294,
36
(
9
), pp.
873
884
.
4.
Matjacic
,
Z.
, and
Bajd
,
T.
, 1998, “
Arm-Free Paraplegic Standing. I. Control Model Synthesis and Simulation
,”
IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng.
1063-6528,
6
(
2
), pp.
125
138
.
5.
Abbas
,
J. J.
, and
Chizeck
,
H. J.
, 1991, “
Feedback Control of Coronal Plane Hip Angle in Paraplegic Subjects Using Functional Neuromuscular Stimulation
,”
IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.
0018-9294,
38
(
7
), pp.
687
698
.
6.
Jaime
,
R.-P.
,
Matjačić
,
Z.
, and
Hunt
,
K. J.
, 2002, “
Paraplegic Standing Supported by FES-Controlled Ankle Stiffness
,”
IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng.
1534-4320,
10
(
4
), pp.
239
248
.
7.
Winter
,
D. A.
, 1990,
Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement
,
Wiley
,
New York
, Chaps. 2–6.
8.
Yamaguchi
,
G. T.
, and
Zajac
,
F. E.
, 1990, “
Restoring Unassisted Natural Gait to Paraplegics Via Functional Neuromuscular Stimulation: A Computer Simulation Study
,”
IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.
0018-9294,
37
(
9
), pp.
886
902
.
9.
Zajac
,
F. E.
, 1993, “
Muscle Coordination of Movement: A Perspective
,”
J. Biomech.
0021-9290,
26
(Suppl 1), pp.
109
124
.
10.
Anderson
,
F. C.
, and
Pandy
,
M. G.
, 2001, “
Dynamic Optimization of Human Walking
,”
ASME J. Biomech. Eng.
0148-0731,
123
(
5
), pp.
381
390
.
11.
Chao
,
E. Y.
, and
Rim
,
K.
, 1973, “
Application of Optimization Principles in Determining the Applied Moments in Human Leg Joint During Gait
,”
J. Biomech.
0021-9290,
6
(
5
), pp.
497
510
.
12.
Runge
,
C. F.
,
Zajac
,
F. E.
,
Allum
,
J. H. J.
,
Risher
,
D.
,
Bryson
,
A. E.
, and
Honegger
,
F.
, 1995, “
Estimating Net Joint Torques From Kinesiological Data Using Optimal Linear System Theory
,”
IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.
0018-9294,
42
(
12
), pp.
1158
1164
.
13.
Bresler
,
B.
, and
Frankel
,
J. P.
, 1950, “
The Force and Moments in the Leg During Level Walking
,”
Trans. ASME
0097-6822,
72
, pp.
27
36
.
14.
Cahouet
,
V.
,
Luc
,
M.
, and
David
,
A.
, 2002, “
Static Optimal Estimation of Joint Accelerations for Inverse Dynamics Problem Solution
,”
J. Biomech.
0021-9290,
35
(
11
), pp.
1507
1513
.
15.
Kuo
,
A. D.
, 1998, “
A Least-Squares Estimation Approach to Improving the Precision of Inverse Dynamics Computations
,”
J. Biomed. Eng.
0141-5425,
120
(
1
), pp.
148
159
.
16.
Kim
,
J. Y.
, 2005, “
3D Dynamic Modeling, Control Synthesis, and Controllability Analysis for FES-Assisted Paraplegic Standing
,” M.A.Sc. thesis, University of Toronto, Canada.
17.
Kim
,
J. Y.
,
Popovic
,
M. R.
, and
Mills
,
J. K.
, 2006, “
Dynamic Modeling and Torque Estimation of FES-Assisted Arm-Free Standing for Paraplegics
,”
IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng.
1534-4320,
14
(
1
), pp.
46
54
.
18.
Levin
,
O.
,
Mizrahi
,
J.
, and
Shoham
,
M.
, 1998, “
Standing Sway: Iterative Estimation of the Kinematics and Dynamics of the Lower Extremities From Force-Plate Measurements
,”
Biol. Cybern.
0340-1200,
78
, pp.
319
327
.
19.
Sias
,
F. R.
, and
Zheng
,
Y. F.
, 1990, “
How Many Degrees-of-Freedom Does a Biped Need?
,”
Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on International Robotics and Systems
, Vol.
1
, pp.
297
302
.
20.
Denavit
,
J.
, and
Hartenberg
,
R. S.
, 1955, “
A Kinematic Notation for Lower-Pair Mechanisms Based on Matrices
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
0021-8936,
77
, pp.
215
221
.
21.
Nakamura
,
Y.
, and
Ghodoussi
,
M.
, 1989, “
Dynamics Computation of Closed-Link Robot Mechanisms With Nonredundant and Redundant Actuators
,”
IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.
1042-296X,
5
(
3
), pp.
294
302
.
22.
Gollee
,
H.
,
Hunt
,
K. J.
, and
Wood
,
D. E.
, 2004, “
New Results in Feedback Control of Unsupported Standing in Paraplegia
,”
IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng.
1534-4320,
12
(
1
), pp.
73
80
.
23.
Risher
,
D.
,
Schutte
,
L. M.
, and
Runge
,
C. F.
, 1997, “
The Use of Inverse Dynamics Solutions in Direct Dynamics Simulations
,”
ASME J. Biomech. Eng.
0148-0731,
119
(
4
), pp.
417
422
.
24.
Slotine
,
J. J.
, and
Li
,
W.
, 1991,
Applied Nonlinear Control
,
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
, Chap. 9.
25.
Giakas
,
G.
, and
Baltzopoulos
,
V.
, 1997, “
A Comparison of Automatic Filtering Techniques Applied to Biomechanical Walking Data
,”
J. Biomech.
0021-9290,
30
(
8
), pp.
847
850
.
26.
Pezzack
,
J. C.
,
Norman
,
R. W.
, and
Winter
,
D. A.
, 1977, “
An Assessment of Derivative Determining Techniques Used for Motion Analysis
,”
J. Biomech.
0021-9290,
10
(
5-6
), pp.
377
382
.
27.
Dumont
,
C. E.
,
Popovic
,
M. R.
,
Keller
,
T.
, and
Sheikh
,
R.
, 2006, “
Dynamic Force-Sharing in Multi-Digit Task
,”
Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon)
0268-0033,
21
(
2
), pp.
138
146
.
28.
Vette
,
A. H.
,
Masani
,
K.
, and
Popovic
,
M. R.
, 2007, “
Implementation of a Physiologically Identified PD Feedback Controller for Regulating the Active Ankle Torque During Quiet Stance
,”
IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng.
1534-4320,
15
(
2
), pp.
235
243
.
29.
Popovic
,
M. R.
, and
Keller
,
T.
, 2005, “
Modular Transcutaneous Functional Electrical Stimulation System
,”
Med. Eng. Phys.
1350-4533,
27
(
1
), pp.
81
92
.
30.
Marsolais
,
E. B.
, and
Kobetic
,
R.
, 1988, “
Development of a Practical Stimulation System for Restoring Gait in the Paralyzed Patient
,”
Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.
0009-921X,
233
, pp.
64
74
.
You do not currently have access to this content.