Most solders used in electronic systems have low-melting temperature and hence experience significant amount of creep deformation throughout their life-cycle because typical operational and test conditions represent high homologous temperature. Phenomenological and mechanistic models used in the literature for predicting creep response of both bulk and grain scale specimens are reviewed in this paper. The phenomenological models reviewed in this paper are based on purely empirical observations of the creep deformation behavior or derived from qualitative interpretation of the underlying microscale mechanisms. These models have some intrinsic disadvantages since they do not have explicit mechanistic dependence on microstructural features. Therefore, the constitutive relations derived using the above models are difficult to extrapolate beyond the test conditions. This paper also reviews how some of the above limitations can be mitigated by using mechanistic or microstructurally motivated models. Mechanistic models are capable of estimating the material creep response based on the detailed physics of the underlying mechanisms and microstructure. The microstructure and constitutive response of the most popular family of lead-free solders, namely, SnAgCu (SAC) solders, are significantly different from those of previously used eutectic Sn37Pb solder. The creep deformation in Sn37Pb solder occurs primarily through diffusion-assisted grain-boundary sliding. In SAC solder joints, dislocation-based creep deformation mechanisms such as glide, climb, detachment, and cross-slip appear to be the dominant mechanisms in coarse-grained joints. Mechanistic creep models are therefore based on the deformation mechanisms listed above.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2016
Review Articles
Creep Constitutive Models Suitable for Solder Alloys in Electronic Assemblies
Subhasis Mukherjee,
Subhasis Mukherjee
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Maryland,
College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: smukher1@umd.edu
University of Maryland,
College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: smukher1@umd.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Mohammed Nuhi,
Mohammed Nuhi
Department of Reliability Engineering,
University of Maryland,
College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: nuhimohamad@gmail.com
University of Maryland,
College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: nuhimohamad@gmail.com
Search for other works by this author on:
Abhijit Dasgupta,
Abhijit Dasgupta
Professor
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Maryland,
College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: dasgupta@umd.edu
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Maryland,
College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: dasgupta@umd.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Mohammad Modarres
Mohammad Modarres
Professor
Department of Reliability Engineering,
University of Maryland,
College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: modarres@umd.edu
Department of Reliability Engineering,
University of Maryland,
College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: modarres@umd.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Subhasis Mukherjee
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Maryland,
College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: smukher1@umd.edu
University of Maryland,
College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: smukher1@umd.edu
Mohammed Nuhi
Department of Reliability Engineering,
University of Maryland,
College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: nuhimohamad@gmail.com
University of Maryland,
College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: nuhimohamad@gmail.com
Abhijit Dasgupta
Professor
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Maryland,
College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: dasgupta@umd.edu
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Maryland,
College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: dasgupta@umd.edu
Mohammad Modarres
Professor
Department of Reliability Engineering,
University of Maryland,
College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: modarres@umd.edu
Department of Reliability Engineering,
University of Maryland,
College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: modarres@umd.edu
Contributed by the Electronic and Photonic Packaging Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC PACKAGING. Manuscript received December 29, 2015; final manuscript received April 4, 2016; published online June 8, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Eric Wong.
J. Electron. Packag. Sep 2016, 138(3): 030801 (13 pages)
Published Online: June 8, 2016
Article history
Received:
December 29, 2015
Revised:
April 4, 2016
Citation
Mukherjee, S., Nuhi, M., Dasgupta, A., and Modarres, M. (June 8, 2016). "Creep Constitutive Models Suitable for Solder Alloys in Electronic Assemblies." ASME. J. Electron. Packag. September 2016; 138(3): 030801. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4033375
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Performance Analysis of a Brazed Plate Heat Exchanger During Condensation of R1233zd(E)
J. Electron. Packag (June 2025)
Wideband Equivalent Circuit Modeling and Parameter Extraction Method for Through Via in Ceramic Package Substrate
J. Electron. Packag (June 2025)
Sequential Versus Concurrent Effects in Combined Stress Solder Joint Reliability
J. Electron. Packag (June 2025)
Related Articles
A Damage-Mechanics-Based Constitutive Model for Solder Joints
J. Electron. Packag (September,2005)
Coarsening in BGA Solder Balls: Modeling and Experimental Evaluation
J. Electron. Packag (September,2003)
Hierarchal Modeling of Creep Behavior of SnAg Solder Alloys
J. Electron. Packag (September,2008)
Fatigue Life Estimation of Solder Joints in SMT-PGA Packages
J. Electron. Packag (June,1998)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Thermotriples
Hot Air Rises and Heat Sinks: Everything You Know about Cooling Electronics Is Wrong
A Dependable Answer
Hot Air Rises and Heat Sinks: Everything You Know about Cooling Electronics Is Wrong
Analysis of Components: Strain- and Deformation-Controlled Limits
Design & Analysis of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Components in the Creep Range