Current design and performance of the GLCC©1 separator is dependent on the prediction of the upstream inlet flow conditions based on available models. It is expected that early detection of terrain slugging (slug length, slug velocity and holdup) and controlling the liquid level in the GLCC using feed forward mechanism can improve the operational range of the GLCC, by decreasing the gas carry under and liquid carry over, and thereby decreasing the control valve dynamics. The conventional feedback control loops can seldom achieve perfect control considering the impact of huge slugs that are keeping the output of the process continuously away from desired set point value. The reason is simple: a feedback controller reacts only after it has detected a deviation in the value of the level from the set point. Unlike the feedback systems, a feed forward control configuration measures the disturbance directly and takes control action to negate the effect of the disturbance on liquid level in the GLCC. Therefore, a feed forward control system has the theoretical potential for perfect control if the slug detection and characterization are perfect. A strategy for GLCC predictive control has been proposed which integrates the feedback and feed forward loops to compensate for error due to modeling and slug characterization. A model has been developed for predictive control system design and simulated in MATLAB-Simulink®. Experimental results obtained demonstrate that the proposed strategy is a viable approach for GLCC predictive control.

1.
Marrelli, J. D., Tallet, M., Yocum, B., Dunbar, D., Mohan, R. S., and Shoham, O., 2000, “Methods for Optimal Matching of Separation and Metering Facilities for Performance, Cost, and Size: Practical Examples from Duri Area 10 Expansion” ETCE00-ER-10165, proceedings of the ETCE 2000 Conference of ASME Petroleum Division of ASME Petroleum Division, February 14–17, 2000.
2.
Andreussi
,
P.
,
Bendiksen
,
K. H.
, and
Nydal
,
O. J.
,
1993
, “
Void Distribution in Slug Flow
,”
Int. J. Multiphase Flow
,
19
(
5
), pp.
817
828
.
3.
Dhulesia, H., Bernicot, M., and Romanet, T., 1995, “Field Installation of an Acoustic Slug-Detection System,” presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, October 22–25, pp. 285–291.
4.
Barnea
,
D.
,
Shoham
,
O.
,
Taitel
,
Y.
, and
Dukler
,
A. E.
,
1980
, “
Flow Pattern Characterization for Two-Phase Flow by Electrical Conductance Probe
,”
Int. J. Multiphase Flow
,
6
, pp.
387
397
.
5.
Wang, S., 1997, “Control System Analysis of Gas-Liquid Cylindrical Cyclone Separators,” M.S. thesis, The University of Tulsa.
6.
Mohan
,
R.
,
Wang
,
S.
,
Shoham
,
O.
, and
Kouba
,
G.
,
1998
, “
Design and Performance of Passive Control System for Gas-Liquid Cylindrical Cyclone Separators
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
120
(
1
), pp.
49
55
.
7.
Wang
,
S.
,
Mohan
,
R. S.
,
Shoham
,
O.
,
Marrelli
,
J. D.
, and
Kouba
,
G. E.
,
2000
, “
Performance Improvement of Gas Liquid Cylindrical Cyclone Separators Using Integrated Liquid Level and Pressure Control Systems
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
122
, pp.
185
192
.
8.
Wang
,
S.
,
Mohan
,
R.
,
Shoham
,
O.
,
Marrelli
,
J.
, and
Kouba
,
G.
,
2000
, “
Control System Simulators for Gas-Liquid Cylindrical Cyclone Separators
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
122
, pp.
177
184
.
9.
Wang, S., 2000, “Dynamic Simulation, Experimental Investigation and Control System Design of Gas-Liquid Cylindrical Cyclone Separators,” Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Tulsa.
10.
Payne, R. L., Huff, R. E., and Ogren, W. E. 1996, “Slug Flow Mitigation Control System and Method,” U.S. Patent 5544672.
11.
Earni, B. S., 2001, “Predictive Control of Gas-Liquid Cylindrical Cyclone (GLCC) Separators,” M.S. thesis, The University of Tulsa.
12.
Stephanopoulos, G., 1984, “Chemical Process Control,” PTR Prentice Hall International Series in the Physical and Chemical Engineering Sciences.
13.
Taitel, Y., and Barnea, D., 1990, “Two-phase Slug Flow,” Academic Press, Inc.
14.
Norman S. Nise, 2000, “Control System Engineering,” 3rd Edition Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc.
You do not currently have access to this content.