Conventional gas-liquid separators are vessel-type with simple level and pressure control since the residence time is large. Compact gas-liquid separators, such as gas-liquid cylindrical cyclone (GLCC©—gas-liquid cylindrical cyclone—copyright, University of Tulsa, 1994), have emerged recently as alternatives to reduce size and increase separation efficiency for onshore, offshore, and subsea applications. As compared with the vessel-type separators, compact separators are simple, low-cost, low-weight, require little maintenance and are easy to install and operate. However, the residence time of the GLCC is very small. Consequently, it can be destabilized easily due to high flow variations at the inlet, for example, slugging, without the aid of fast and accurate control systems. In the past, lack of understanding of control system dynamics and design tools has prevented this technology from fast field deployment. The objective of this study is to present a review of the compact gas-liquid separator (GLCC) control technology. This includes the development of control strategies, control system design, dynamic simulation, experimental investigation, and field applications. The performance of compact gas-liquid separator (GLCC) strongly depends on the liquid level and/or separating pressure. In this investigation, several control strategies have been presented for field applications of gas-liquid compact separators. Especially, an optimal control strategy was developed for handling slug flow and optimizing the system performance in terms of reduced or eliminated liquid carry-over or gas carry-under. The developed strategies have been used for the design of several hundreds of GLCC applications, currently in operation in the field. Details of some of these applications are also presented. This study provides the state-of-the-art of gas-liquid compact separator control technology from the laboratory to the field.

1.
Genceli
,
H.
,
Kuenhold
,
K.
,
Shoham
,
O.
, and
Brill
,
J. P.
, 1988, “
Dynamic Simulation of Slug Catcher Behavior
,”
Presented at the SPE 63rd Annual Meeting
, Houston, Oct. 2–5.
2.
Kolpak
,
M. M.
, 1994,
Passive Level Control in Two-Phase Separator
, Internal Communication, Arco Exploration and Production Technology.
3.
Wang
,
S.
, 1997, “
Control System Analysis of Gas-Liquid Cylindrical Cyclone Separators
,” MS thesis, University of Tulsa.
4.
Roy
,
S.
, and
Smith
,
C.
, 1995,
Better Than Averaging Level Control
,
University of South Florida
,
Florida
.
5.
Galichet
,
S.
,
Foulloy
,
L.
,
Chebre
,
M.
, and
Beauchene
,
J. P.
, 1994, “
Fuzzy Logic Control of a Floating Level in a Refinery Tank
,”
Proceedings of 1994 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems
, pp.
1538
1542
.
6.
Ziegler
,
J.
, and
Nichols
,
N.
, 1942, “
Optimum Settings for Automatic Controllers
,”
Trans. ASME
0097-6822,
64
, pp.
759
768
.
7.
Gorez
,
R.
, 1997, “
A Survey of PID Auto-Tuning Methods
,”
Journal A
0771-1107,
38
(
1
), pp.
3
10
.
8.
Vrancic
,
D.
,
Peng
,
Y.
,
Strmcnik
,
S.
, and
Hanus
,
R.
, 1996, “
A New Tuning Method for PI Controllers Based on Process Step Response
,”
CESA’96 IMACS Multiconference, Symposium on Control, Optimization and Supervision
, Lille, Vol.
2
, pp.
760
794
.
9.
Luo
,
R.
,
Qin
,
S. J.
, and
Chen
,
D.
, 1998, “
A New Approach to Closed Loop Autotuning for PID Controllers
,”
I&EC Research
,
37
, pp.
2462
2468
. 0002-7820
10.
Kraus
,
T.
, and
Myron
,
T.
, 1984, “
Self-Tuning PID Controller Uses Pattern Recognition Approach
,”
Control Eng.
0010-8049,
June
, pp.
109
111
.
11.
Wang
,
S.
, 2000, “
Dynamic Simulation, Experimental Investigation and Control System Design of Gas-Liquid Cylindrical Cyclone Separators
,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tulsa.
12.
Wang
,
S.
,
Mohan
,
R.
,
Shoham
,
O.
, and
Kouba
,
G.
, 2001, “
Dynamic Simulation and Control System Design of Gas-Liquid Cylindrical Cyclone Separators
,”
SPE Journal
,
6
(
2
), pp.
236
247
. 0002-7820
13.
Wang
,
S.
,
Mohan
,
R. S.
,
Shoham
,
O.
,
Marrelli
,
J. D.
, and
Kouba
,
G. E.
, 2002, “
Optimal Control Strategy and Experimental Investigation of Gas-Liquid Compact Separators
,”
SPE Journal
,
7
, pp.
170
182
. 0002-7820
14.
Earni
,
S.
,
Wang
,
S.
,
Mohan
,
R. S.
,
Shoham
,
O.
, and
Marrelli
,
J. D.
, 2003, “
Slug Detection as a Tool for Predictive Control of GLCC Compact Separators
,”
Trans. ASME
0097-6822,
125
(
2
), pp.
145
153
.
15.
Sampath
,
V.
,
Wang
,
S.
,
Mohan
,
R. S.
, and
Shoham
,
O.
, 2004, “
Adaptive Control Technique a Solution for GLCC Separators
,”
Proceedings of ISA EXPO 2003
, Houston, TX, Oct. 21–23.
You do not currently have access to this content.