Part 2 of this two-part paper provides an example case study following the recently developed comprehensive verification and validation approach presented in Part 1. The case study is for a RANS simulation of an established benchmark for ship hydrodynamics using a ship hydrodynamics CFD code. Verification of the resistance (integral variable) and wave profile (point variable) indicates iterative uncertainties much less than grid uncertainties and simulation numerical uncertainties of about is the simulation value for the finest grid). Validation of the resistance and wave profile shows modeling errors of about (D is the measured resistance) and is the maximum wave elevation), which should be addressed for possible validation at the and levels. Reducing the level of validation primarily requires reduction in experimental uncertainties. The reduction of both modeling errors and experimental uncertainties will produce verified and validated solutions at low levels for this application using the present CFD code. Although there are many issues for practical applications, the methodology and procedures are shown to be successful for assessing levels of verification and validation and identifying modeling errors in some cases. For practical applications, solutions are far from the asymptotic range; therefore, analysis and interpretation of the results are shown to be important in assessing variability for order of accuracy, levels of verification, and strategies for reducing numerical and modeling errors and uncertainties.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
December 2001
Technical Papers
Comprehensive Approach to Verification and Validation of CFD Simulations—Part 2: Application for Rans Simulation of a Cargo/Container Ship
Robert V. Wilson, Assistant Research Engineer, Mem. ASME,
Robert V. Wilson, Assistant Research Engineer, Mem. ASME
Iowa Institute Hydraulic Research, Department Mechanical Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242
Search for other works by this author on:
Fred Stern, Professor Mechanical Engineering and Research Engineer, Fellow ASME,
Fred Stern, Professor Mechanical Engineering and Research Engineer, Fellow ASME
Iowa Institute Hydraulic Research, Department Mechanical Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242
Search for other works by this author on:
Hugh W. Coleman, Fellow ASME, Eminent Scholar in Propulsion, Professor of Mechanical Engineering,,
Hugh W. Coleman, Fellow ASME, Eminent Scholar in Propulsion, Professor of Mechanical Engineering,
Propulsion Research Center, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899
Search for other works by this author on:
Eric G. Paterson, Mem. ASME, Associate Research Engineer,
Eric G. Paterson, Mem. ASME, Associate Research Engineer,
Iowa Institute Hydraulic Research, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242
Search for other works by this author on:
Robert V. Wilson, Assistant Research Engineer, Mem. ASME
Iowa Institute Hydraulic Research, Department Mechanical Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242
Fred Stern, Professor Mechanical Engineering and Research Engineer, Fellow ASME
Iowa Institute Hydraulic Research, Department Mechanical Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242
Hugh W. Coleman, Fellow ASME, Eminent Scholar in Propulsion, Professor of Mechanical Engineering,
Propulsion Research Center, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899
Eric G. Paterson, Mem. ASME, Associate Research Engineer,
Iowa Institute Hydraulic Research, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242
Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received by the Fluids Engineering Division November 4, 1999; revised manuscript received July 10, 2001. Associate Editor: P. E. Raad.
J. Fluids Eng. Dec 2001, 123(4): 803-810 (8 pages)
Published Online: July 10, 2001
Article history
Received:
November 4, 1999
Revised:
July 10, 2001
Citation
Wilson, R. V., Stern, F., Coleman, H. W., and Paterson, E. G. (July 10, 2001). "Comprehensive Approach to Verification and Validation of CFD Simulations—Part 2: Application for Rans Simulation of a Cargo/Container Ship ." ASME. J. Fluids Eng. December 2001; 123(4): 803–810. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1412236
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Related Articles
Comprehensive Approach to Verification and Validation of CFD Simulations—Part 1: Methodology and Procedures
J. Fluids Eng (December,2001)
Closure to “Discussion of ‘Comprehensive Approach to Verification and Validation of CFD Simulations—Part 1: Methodology and Procedures’ ” (2002, ASME J. Fluids Eng., 124, p. 809)
J. Fluids Eng (September,2002)
Closure to “Discussion of ‘Comprehensive Approach to Verification and Validation of CFD Simulations—Part 1: Methodology and Procedures’ ” (2002, ASME J. Fluids Eng., 124, p. 809)
J. Fluids Eng (September,2002)
Discussion: Criticisms of the “Correction Factor” Verification Method
J. Fluids Eng (July,2004)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Integrated Safety Assessment of Small Container Ships (PSAM-0234)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Ship Stowage Scheduling of Container Terminal by Combinatorial Optimization Algorithm and Strategy
International Symposium on Information Engineering and Electronic Commerce, 3rd (IEEC 2011)
Ship Loading Scheduling Strategy of Container Terminal with Heuristic Greedy Algorithm
International Symposium on Information Engineering and Electronic Commerce, 3rd (IEEC 2011)