The effect of yaw angle and cavity depth on the resulting flow field of cavities with elliptical planform areas embedded in a low velocity turbulent boundary layer was investigated experimentally. A 2:1 elliptical cavity with depth to minor axis ratios ranging from 0.1 to 1.0 was tested in a wind tunnel facility. Surface pressure measurements and wake velocity measurements, using hot-wire anemometry, were conducted to examine the resulting flow regimes. The results indicated several different flow regimes for the different yaw angle and cavity depth configurations. Cellular structures were observed when the minor axis was aligned with the streamwise direction. Yawing the cavity with respect to the streamwise direction resulted in a highly asymmetric flow regime. This flow regime was also associated with high drag for certain cavity depth configurations. A nominally two-dimensional flow regime was observed for large yaw angles, when the major axis of the cavity was aligned with the streamwise direction. The yaw angle had only a minor effect on the flow regimes associated with the shallowest and deepest cavities examined. A strong resemblance was found between the flow regimes associated with elliptical and rectangular cavities for similar yaw and depth configurations. This similarity was also observed in the lift and drag coefficients for the different yaw angles and cavity depths. This indicated that the wall radius of curvature of elliptical cavities has a negligible effect on the resulting flow regimes when compared to rectangular cavities.

1.
Friesing
,
H.
, 1936, “
Measurement of the Drag Associated With Recessed Surfaces: Cut-Outs of Rectangular and Elliptical Planform
,” ZWBFB Report No. 628 (RAE Library Translation No. 1614, 1971).
2.
Charwat
,
A. F.
,
Roos
,
J. N.
Dewey
, Jr.,
F. C.
, and
Hitz
,
J. A.
, 1961, “
Investigation of Separated Flows, Part I: The Pressure Field
,”
J. Aerosp. Sci.
0095-9820,
28
(
6–7
), pp.
457
470
.
3.
Roshko
,
A.
, 1955, “
Some Measurement of Flow in a Rectangular Cutout
,” NACA TN Report No. 3488.
4.
Ukeiley
,
L.
, and
Murray
,
N.
, 2005, “
Velocity and Surface Pressure Measurements in an Open Cavity
,”
Exp. Fluids
0723-4864,
38
, pp.
656
671
.
5.
Maull
,
D. J.
, and
East
,
L. F.
, 1963, “
Three-Dimensional Flow in Cavities
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
16
, pp.
620
632
.
6.
Kistler
,
A. L.
, and
Tan
,
F. C.
, 1967, “
Some Properties of Turbulent Separated Flows
,”
Phys. Fluids
0031-9171,
10
(
9
), pp.
S165
173
.
7.
Young
,
A. D.
, and
Paterson
,
J. H.
, 1981, “
Aircraft Excrescence Drag
,” NATO Report No. AGARD-AG-264.
8.
Czech
,
M.
, 2000, “
The Acoustics and Aerodynamics of Turbulent Flow Over Yawed, Rectangular Cavities
,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Surrey, Guildford, England.
9.
Savory
,
E.
,
Toy
,
N.
,
Disimile
,
P.
, and
Dimicco
,
R.
, 1993, “
The Drag of Three-Dimensional Rectangular Cavities
,”
Appl. Sci. Res.
0003-6994,
50
, pp.
325
346
.
10.
Savory
,
E.
, and
Toy
,
N.
, 1993, “
The Flows Associated With Elliptical Cavities
,”
Symposium on Separated Flows, ASME Fluids Engineering Conference
,
Washington, DC
, FED Paper No. 149, pp.
95
103
.
11.
Adams
,
E. W.
, and
Johnston
,
J. P.
, 1988, “
Effects of the Separating Shear Layer Reattachment Flow Structure Part 1: Pressure and Turbulence Quantities
,”
Exp. Fluids
0723-4864,
6
(
7
), pp.
400
408
.
12.
Dubief
,
Y.
, and
Delcayre
,
F.
, 2000, “
On Coherent-Vortex Identification in Turbulence
,”
J. Turbul.
1468-5248,
1
(
11
), pp.
1
22
.
13.
Plentovich
,
E. B.
,
Stallings
,
R. L.
, and
Tracy
,
M. B.
, 1993, “
Experimental Cavity Pressure Measurements at Subsonic and Transonic Speeds
,” NASA TP Report No. 3358.
14.
Ashcroft
,
G.
, and
Zhang
,
X.
, 2005, “
Vortical Structures Over Rectangular Cavities at Low Speed
,”
Phys. Fluids
1070-6631,
17
(
1
), pp.
1
8
.
15.
ESDU
, 2004, “
Aerodynamics and Aero-Acoustics of Rectangular Planform Cavities. Part I: Time-Averaged Flow
,” ESDU International, Data Item No. 02008.
16.
Haugen
,
R. L.
, and
Dhanak
,
A. M.
, 1966, “
Momentum Transfer in Turbulent Separated Flow Past a Rectangular Cavity
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
0021-8936,
33
, pp.
641
646
.
You do not currently have access to this content.