Abstract

The pressure-time method allows measuring the flowrate in hydraulic turbines, according to IEC 60041 standard. According to this standard, the applicability of the pressure-time method is limited to a straight pipe with a constant cross section with specific limits for length and velocity. However, low-head hydropower plants usually have an intake with a variable cross section and short length making this method difficult to be applied. In this paper, a test rig has been developed to extend the method's applicability. The test rig is designed for developing flows condition and small measurement lengths for pipes with constant and variable cross section, which could be similar to low-head turbine conditions. For pipe with constant cross section, three measuring lengths of 0.5, 1, and 1.5 m can be obtained on this test rig to study the pressure-time method. For pipe with variable cross section, the method is applied across a concentric reducer with a length of 255 mm, i.e., a 9.46 deg reducing angle. Different flow assumptions for estimation of the head loss and dynamic pressure variation are considered to compare the accuracy of discharge measurement. The results showed that the quasi-steady assumption for friction factor and kinetic energy, along with friction factor correction, increases the method accuracy up to 0.4% compared with the current standard recommendations. Moreover, the Monte Carlo method (MCM) is applied to estimate the transient measurement uncertainty and compared with the Taylor series method (TSM).

References

1.
IEC,
1991
, “
Field Acceptance Tests to Determine the Hydraulic Performance of Hydraulic Turbines, Storage Pumps and Pump-Turbines
,” IEC, Geneva, Switzerland, International Standard No. IEC 60041.
2.
Baidar
,
B.
,
Nicolle
,
J.
,
Trivedi
,
C.
, and
Cervantes
,
M. J.
,
2016
, “
Winter-Kennedy Method in Hydraulic Discharge Measurement: Problems and Challenges
,” Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Hydraulic Efficiency Measurement (
IGHEM 2016
),
Linz, Austria
, Aug. 24–26, pp.
11
21
.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307173383_Winter-Kennedy_method_in_hydraulic_discharge_measurement_Problems_and_Challenges
3.
Saemi
,
S.
,
Raisee
,
M.
,
Cervantes
,
M. J.
, and
Nourbakhsh
,
A.
,
2018
, “
Numerical Investigation of the Pressure-Time Method Considering Pipe With Variable Cross Section
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
140
(
10
), p.
101401
.10.1115/1.4040718
4.
Adamkowski
,
A.
,
Janicki
,
W.
,
Krzemianowski
,
Z.
, and
Lewandowski
,
M.
,
2019
, “
Flow Rate Measurements in Hydropower Plants Using the Pressure-Time Method—Experiences and Improvements
,”
Flow Meas. Instrum.
,
68
, p.
101584
.10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2019.101584
5.
Adamkowski
,
A.
, and
Janicki
,
W.
,
2010
, “
Selected Problems in Calculation Procedures for the Gibson Discharge Measurement Method
,” Proceeding of the 8th International Conference on Hydraulic Efficiency Measurement (
IGHEM-2010
),
Roorkee, India
, Oct. 21–23, pp.
21
23
.https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Adam-Adamkowski/publication/266503526_SELECTED_PROBLEMS_IN_CALCULATION_PROCEDURES_FOR_THE_GIBSON_DISCHARGE_MEASUREMENT_METHOD/links/54afb2380cf29661a3d5cf72/SELECTED-PROBLEMS-IN-CALCULATION-PROCEDURES-FORTHE-GIBSON-DISCHARGE-MEASUREMENT-METHOD.pdf
6.
Ramdal
,
J.
,
Jonsson
,
P. P.
,
Dahlhaug
,
O. G.
,
Nielsen
,
T. K.
, and
Cervantes
,
M.
,
2010
, “
Uncertainties for Pressure-Time Efficiency Measurements
,”
Proceeding of the 8th International Conference on Hydraulic Efficiency Measurement
, Roorkee, India, Oct. 21–23, pp.
64
72
.http://www.ighem.org/Paper2010/T SB02.pdf
7.
Jonsson
,
P. P.
,
Ramdal
,
J.
, and
Cervantes
,
M. J.
,
2012
, “
Development of the Gibson Method-Unsteady Friction
,”
Flow Meas. Instrum.
,
23
(
1
), pp.
19
25
.10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2011.12.008
8.
Saemi
,
S.
,
Cervantes
,
M. J.
,
Raisee
,
M.
, and
Nourbakhsh
,
A.
,
2017
, “
Numerical Investigation of the Pressure-Time Method
,”
Flow Meas. Instrum.
,
55
, pp.
44
58
.10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2017.05.003
9.
Lövgren
,
H.
,
Cervantes
,
M.
,
Finnström
,
M.
, and
Gustavsson
,
H.
,
2006
, “
Experimental and Numerical Study for Extension of Gibson's Method
,”
Proceeding of the 23rd IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems
,
Yokohama, Japan
, Oct. 17–21, p.
163
.
10.
Jonsson
,
P. P.
,
Ramdal
,
J.
,
Cervantes
,
M. J.
, and
Getz
,
A.
,
2009
, “
Experimental Investigation of the Gibson's Method Outside Standard
,”
Proceeding of the 24th Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems
, Foz Do Iguassu, Brazil, Oct. 27–31, pp.
1
9
.
11.
Jonsson
,
P. P.
,
Cervantes
,
M. J.
, and
Finnström
,
M.
,
2007
, “
Numerical Investigation of the Gibson's Method: Effects of Connecting Tubing
,”
Proceeding of the 2nd IAHR International Meeting of the Workgroup on Cavitation and Dynamic Problems in Hydraulic Machinery and Systems
, Timisoara, Romania, Oct. 24–26, pp.
305
310
.http://www.divaportal.org/smash/get/diva2:1013974/FULLT EXT01.pdf
12.
Ramdal
,
J.
,
Jonsson
,
P.
, and
Nielsen
,
T.
,
2010
, “
Influence From Bends on a Pressure-Time Measurement
,”
IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci.
,
12
, p.
012078
.10.1088/1755-1315/12/1/012078
13.
Adamkowski
,
A.
,
Krzemianowski
,
Z.
, and
Janicki
,
W.
,
2009
, “
Improved Discharge Measurement Using the Pressure-Time Method in a Hydropower Plant Curved Penstock
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
131
(
5
), p. 053003.10.1115/1.3078794
14.
Coleman
,
H. W.
, and
Steele
,
W. G.
,
2018
,
Experimentation, Validation, and Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers
, 4th ed.,
Wiley
, Hoboken, NJ.
15.
Adamkowski
,
A.
,
Janicki
,
W.
, and
Lewandowski
,
M.
,
2020
, “
Measurements of Discharge Through a Pump-Turbine in Both Flow Directions Using Volumetric Gauging and Pressure-Time Methods
,”
Energies (Basel)
,
13
(
18
), p.
4706
.10.3390/en13184706
16.
Hulaas
,
H. J.
, and
Dahlhaug
,
O. G.
,
2006
, “
Uncertainty Analysis of Pressure-Time Measurements
,”
Proceeding of the 6th International Conference on Innovation in Hydraulic Efficiency Measurements
,
Portland, OR
, July 30–Aug. 1, pp.
11
21
.http://www.ighem.org/Paper2006/d13.pdf
17.
Adamkowski
,
A.
,
Janicki
,
W.
,
Lewandowski
,
M.
, and
Costa Bortoni
,
E. D.
,
2021
, “
Uncertainty Analysis of Liquid Flow Rate Measurement With the Pressure–Time Method
,”
Measurement (London)
,
185
, p.
109866
.10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109866
18.
International Electrotechnical Comission
,
2019
, “
Hydraulic Turbines, Storage Pumps and Pump-Turbines—Model Acceptance Tests
,” International Electrotechnical Comission, Geneva, Switzerland, Standard No. IEC 60193:2019.
19.
Bajsic
,
I.
,
Kutin
,
J.
, and
Zagar
,
T.
,
2007
, “
Response Time of a Pressure Measurement System With a Connecting Tube
,”
Instrum. Sci. Technol.
,
35
(
4
), pp.
399
409
.10.1080/10739140701436579
20.
Çengel
,
Y. A.
, and
Cimbala
,
J. M.
,
2013
,
Fluid Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications
, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
21.
White
,
F. M.
,
2011
,
Fluid Mechanics
, 7th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
22.
Teleszewski
,
T. J.
,
2018
, “
Experimental Investigation of the Kinetic Energy Correction Factor in Pipe Flow
,”
Proceeding of the 10th Conference on Interdisciplinary Problems in Environmental Protection and Engineering EKO-DOK E3S Web of Conferences
, Bialystok, Poland, Apr. 16–18, pp.
1369
1374
.
23.
Kakaç
,
S.
,
Shah
,
R. K.
, and
Aung
,
W.
,
1987
,
Handbook of Single-Phase Convective Heat Transfer
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
24.
Jonsson
,
P.
,
Jonsson
,
P. P.
,
Ramdal
,
J.
,
Cervantes
,
M. J.
,
Dahlhaug
,
O. G.
, and
Nielsen
,
T. K.
,
2010
, “
The Pressure-Time Measurements Project at LTU and NTNU
,”
IGHEM-2010
,
Roorkee, India
, Oct. 21–23, pp.
11
21
.http://www.ighem.org/Paper2010/T SB01.pdf
You do not currently have access to this content.