Detailed spray characteristics were obtained for a small-capacity, pressure-swirl atomizer using an Aerometrics phase-Doppler particle analyzer. Measurements included drop size and velocity distributions, liquid volume fluxes, and air velocities at four axial locations, 25, 50, 75, and 100 mm, with complete radial traverses at each location. Drop size results were compared with measurements from a Malvern laser-diffraction instrument, and integrated liquid volume fluxes were compared with measured flow rates to estimate measurement uncertainties. Drop sizes measured by the two independent techniques and area-weighted-averaged over the radial traverses at each of the four axial stations varied on average by less than 4 percent. Integrated volume flux measurements by the phase-Doppler instrument at four axial stations differed from the nozzle flow rate by at most 19 percent, with some of the difference due to evaporation. The phase-Doppler data were used to begin an evaluation of a commercial two-phase, three-dimensional, CFD code (FLUENT). Using a simplified representation of the spray based on velocity measurements 2 mm from the atomizer, it is shown that the model predicts drop trajectories, velocities, and volume fluxes reasonably well, and air entrainment velocities fairly accurately except on the spray centerline. Drop velocity profiles indicate dense spray effects very close to the atomizer that are not properly predicted by the dilute spray model.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
January 1989
Research Papers
Fuel Spray Evolution: Comparison of Experiment and CFD Simulation of Nonevaporating Spray
L. G. Dodge,
L. G. Dodge
Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX 78284
Search for other works by this author on:
J. A. Schwalb
J. A. Schwalb
Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX 78284
Search for other works by this author on:
L. G. Dodge
Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX 78284
J. A. Schwalb
Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX 78284
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. Jan 1989, 111(1): 15-23 (9 pages)
Published Online: January 1, 1989
Article history
Received:
December 16, 1987
Online:
October 15, 2009
Citation
Dodge, L. G., and Schwalb, J. A. (January 1, 1989). "Fuel Spray Evolution: Comparison of Experiment and CFD Simulation of Nonevaporating Spray." ASME. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. January 1989; 111(1): 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3240218
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Shape Optimization of an Industrial Aeroengine Combustor to reduce Thermoacoustic Instability
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Dynamic Response of A Pivot-Mounted Squeeze Film Damper: Measurements and Predictions
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Review of The Impact Of Hydrogen-Containing Fuels On Gas Turbine Hot-Section Materials
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Effects of Lattice Orientation Angle On Tpms-Based Transpiration Cooling
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Related Articles
Drop Size Distribution and Air Velocity Measurements in Air Assist Swirl Atomizer Sprays
J. Fluids Eng (March,1987)
Laser-Based Investigations of Periodic Combustion Instabilities in a Gas Turbine Model Combustor
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (July,2005)
Spray and Flame Structure of a Generic Injector at Aeroengine Conditions
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (March,2012)
Microelectromechanical System-Based Evaporative Thermal Management of High Heat Flux Electronics
J. Heat Transfer (January,2005)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Antilock-Braking System Using Fuzzy Logic
International Conference on Mechanical and Electrical Technology, 3rd, (ICMET-China 2011), Volumes 1–3
Development of Nuclear Boiler and Pressure Vessels in Taiwan
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 3, Third Edition
Fuel Nozzle Geometry Effects on Cavitation and Spray Behavior at Diesel Engine Conditions
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)