The General Electric Company has developed and successfully tested a full-scale, F-class (2550°F combustor exit temperature), rich-quench-lean (RQL) gas turbine combustor, designated RQL2, for low heating value (LHV) fuel and integrated gasification combined cycle applications. Although the primary objective of this effort was to develop an RQL combustor with lower conversion of fuel bound nitrogen to NOx than a conventional gas turbine combustor, the RQL2 design can be readily adapted to natural gas and liquid fuel combustion. RQL2 is the culmination of a 5 year research and development effort that began with natural gas tests of a 2” diameter perforated plate combustor and included LHV fuel tests of RQL1, a reduced scale (6” diameter) gas turbine combustor. The RQL2 combustor includes a 14” diameter converging rich stage liner, an impingement cooled 7” diameter radially-stratified-quench stage, and a backward facing step at the entrance to a 10” diameter film cooled lean stage. The rich stage combustor liner has a novel double-walled structure with narrow circumferential cooling channels to maintain metal wall temperatures within design limits. Provisions were made to allow independent control of the air supplied to the rich and quench/lean stages. RQL2 has been fired for almost 100 hours with LHV fuel supplied by a pilot scale coal gasification and high temperature desulfurization system. At the optimum rich stage equivalence ration NOx emissions were about 50 ppmv (on a dry, 15 percent O2 basis), more than a factor of 3 lower than expected from a conventional diffusion flame combustor burning the same fuel. With 4600 ppmv NH3 in the LHV fuel, this corresponds to a conversion of NH3 to NOx of about 5 percent. As conditions were shifted away from the optimum, RQL2 NOx emissions gradually increased until they were comparable to a standard combustor. A chemical kinetic model of RQL2, constructed from a series of ideal chemical reactors, matched the measured NOx emissions fairly well. The CO emissions were between 5 and 30 ppmv (on a dry, 15 percent O2 basis) under all conditions.

Issue Section:
Gas Turbines: Combustion and Fuels
Topics:
Combustion chambers, Gas turbines, Fuels, Nitrogen oxides, Emissions, Combustion, Design, Natural gas, Coal, Cooling, Desulfurization, Diffusion flames, Fuel gasification, Heating, High temperature, Industrial research, Integrated gasification combined cycle power stations, Metals, Nitrogen, Temperature, Wall temperature
1.
Battista, R. A., Feitelberg, A. S., and Lacey, M. A., 1996, “Design and Performance of Low Heating Value Fuel Gas Turbine Combustors,” ASME Paper No. 96-GT-531.
2.
Bowen, J. H., Feitelberg, A. S., Hung, S. L., Lacey, M. A., and Manning, K. S., 1995, “Performance of Low Btu Fuel Gas Turbine Combustors,” in Proceedings of the Advanced Coal-Fired Power Systems’95 Review Meeting, DOE/METC-95/1018, pp. 250–262.
3.
Domeracki, W. F., Dowdy, T. E., and Bachovchin, D., 1994, “Development of Topping Combustor for Advanced Concept Pressurized Fluidized Bed Combustion,” in Proceedings of the Coat-Fired Power Systems 94 - Advances in IGCC and PFBC Review Meeting, DOE/METC-94/1008, pp. 265–279.
4.
Glarborg, P., Kee, R. J., Grear, J. F., and Miller, J. A., 1986, “PSR: A FORTRAN Program for Modeling Well-Stirred Reactors,” Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND86-8209.
5.
Goebel, S. G. and Feitelberg, A. S., 1992, “Experimental and Theoretical Study of Low Emissions Rich-Quench-Lean Combustion,” a poster paper presented at the 24th Symposium (International) on Combustion, July 5–10, Sydney, Australia.
6.
Heap, M. P., Tyson, T. J., Cichanowicz, J. E., Gershman, R., Kau, C. J. Martin, G. B., and Lanier, W. S., 1977, “Environmental Aspect of Low Btu Gas Combustion,” Sixteenth Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburg, PA, pp. 535–542.
7.
Jackson, M. R., Ritter, A. M., Abuaf, N., Lacey, M. A., Feitelberg, A. S., and Lang, P., 1996, “Joining of Wrought Ni-Base Combustor Alloys,” ASME Paper NO. 96-GT-219.
8.
Kee, R. J., Rupley, F. M., and Miller, J. A., 1989, “Chemkin-II: A Fortran Chemical Kinetics Package for the Analysis of Gas-Phase Chemical Kinetics,” Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND89-8009.
9.
Lefebvre, A. H., 1983, Gas Turbine Combustion, Hemisphere, New York, NY.
10.
Lew, H. G., DeCorso, S. M., Vermes, G., Notardonato, Jr., D. C., and Schwab, J., 1981, “Low NOx and Fuel Flexible Gas Turbine Combustors,” ASME Paper No. 81-GT-99.
11.
Lutz, A. E., Kee, R. J., and Miller, J. A., 1988, “SENKIN: A Fortran Program for Predicting Homogeneous Gas Phase Chemical Kinetics With Sensitivity Analysis,” Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND 87-8248.
12.
Michaud, M. G., Westmoreland, P. R., and Feitelberg, A. S., 1992, “Chemical Mechanisms of NOx Formation for Gas Turbine Conditions,” Twenty-Fourth Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 879–887.
13.
Sato, M., Ninomiya, T., Nakata, T., Yoshine, T., Yamada, M., and Hisa, S., 1990, “Coal Gaseous Fueled, Low Fuel-NOx Gas Turbine Combustor,” ASME Paper No. 90-GT-381.
14.
Takagi
T.
,
Tatsumi
T.
, and
Ogasawara
M.
,
1979
, “
Nitric Oxide Formation From Fuel Nitrogen in Staged Combustion: Roles of HCN and NH
,”
Combustion and Flame
, Vol.
35
, pp.
17
–
25
.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1998
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.