Any prime mover exhibits the effects of wear and tear over time. The problem of predicting the effects of wear and tear on the performance of any engine is still a matter of discussion. Because the function of a gas turbine is the result of the fine-tuned cooperation of many different components, the emphasis of this paper is on the gas turbine and its driven equipment (compressor or pump) as a system, rather than on isolated components. We will discuss the effect of degradation on the package as part of a complex system (e.g., a pipeline, a reinjection station, etc.). Treating the gas turbine package as a system reveals the effects of degradation on the match of the components as well as on the match with the driven equipment. This article will contribute insights into the problem of gas turbine system degradation. Based on some detailed studies on the mechanisms that cause engine degradation, namely, changes in blade surfaces due to erosion or fouling, and the effect on the blade aerodynamics; changes in seal geometries and clearances, and the effect on parasitic flows; and changes in the combustion system (e.g., which result in different pattern factors), the effects of degradation will be discussed. The study includes a methodology to simulate the effects of engine and driven equipment degradation. With a relatively simple set of equations that describe the engine behavior, and a number of linear deviation factors which can easily be obtained from engine maps or test data, the equipment behavior for various degrees of degradation will be studied. A second model, using a stage by stage model for the engine compressor, is used to model the compressor deterioration. The authors have avoided to present figures about the speed of degradation, because it is subject to a variety of operational and design factors that typically cannot be controlled entirely.

1.
Diakunchak, I. S., 1991, “Performance Degradation in Industrial Gas Turbines,” ASME Report No. 91-GT-228.
2.
Brun, K., and Kurz, R., 1998, “Measurement Uncertainties Encountered During Gas Turbine Driven Compressor Field Testing,” ASME Report No. 98-GT-1.
3.
Bakken, L. E., and Skorping, R., 1996, “Optimum Operation and Maintenance of Gas Turbines Offshore,” ASME Report No. 96-GT-273.
4.
Bammert
,
K.
, and
Sonnenschein
,
H.
,
1967
, “
Der Einfluss verdickter und verduennter Turbinenschaufeln auf die Gittereigenschaften
,”
Arch. Eisenhuettenwes.
,
38
, Heft 4, pp.
287
299
.
5.
Bammert, K. et al., 1965, “Ueber Korrosion, Erosion and Verschmutzung bei Gichtgasturbinen,” VIK Bericht No. 164, Essen.
6.
Kind, R. J., Serjak, P. J., and Abbott, M. W. P., 1996, “Measurements and Predictions of the Effects of Surface Roughness on Profile Losses and Deviation in a Turbine Cascade,” ASME Report No. 96-GT-203.
7.
Boelcs
,
A.
, and
Sari
,
O.
,
1988
, “
Influence of Deposit on the Flow in a Turbine Cascade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
110
, pp.
512
519
.
8.
Kurz
,
R.
,
1995
, “
Effects of Nonuniform Blade Pitch on the Flow Through an Annular Turbine Nozzle
,”
Int. Rotating Machinery
,
2
, No.
1
, pp.
59
65
.
9.
Kurz, R., 1991, “Transonic Flow Through Turbine Cascades With 3 Different Pitch-to-Chord Ratios,” Proc. 10. ISABE, Nottingham.
10.
Schmidt, K. J., 1992, “Experimentelle und theoretische Untersuchungen zum instattionaeren Betriebsverhalten von Gasturbinentriebwerken,” VDI, Duesseldorf.
11.
Milsch, R., 1971, “Systematische Untersuchung ueber den Einfluss der Rauhigkeit von Verdichterschaufeln auf den Gitterwirkungsgrad,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Hannover.
12.
Pinson, M., and Wang, T., 1994, “Effects of Leading-Edge Roughness on Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer in the Transitional Boundary Layer of a Flat Plate,” ASME Report No. 94-GT-326.
13.
Shabbir, A., Celestina, M. L., Adamczyk, J. J., and Strazisar, A. J., 1997, “The Effect of Hub Leakage on Two High Speed Axial Flow Compressor Rotors,” ASME Report No. 97-GT-346.
14.
Khalid, S. A., Khalsa, A. S., Waitz, I. A., Tan, S. C., Greitzer, E. M., Cumpsty, N. A., Adamczyk, J. J., and Marble, F. E., 1998, “Endwall Blockage in Axial Compressors,” ASME Report No. 98-GT-188.
15.
Frith, P. C., 1992, “The Effect of Compressor Rotor Tip Crops on Turboshaft Engine Performance,” ASME Report No. 92-GT-83.
16.
Singh, D., Hamed, A., and Tabakoff, W., 1996, “Simulation of Performance Deterioration in Eroded Compressors,” ASME Report No. 96-GT-422.
17.
Elrod, W. C., King, P. I., and Poniatowsky, E. M., 1990, “Effects of Roughness, Freestream Turbulence, and Incidence Angle on the Performance of a 2-D Compressor Cascade,” ASME Report No. 90-GT-208.
18.
Stalder, J. P., 1998, “Gas Turbine Compressor Washing State of the Art Field Experiences,” ASME Report No. 98-GT-420.
19.
Spakovszky, Z. S., Gertz, J. B., Sharma, O. P., Paduano, J. D., Epstein, A. H., and Greitzer, E. M., 1999, “Influence of Compressor Deterioration on Engine Dynamic Behavior and Transient Stall Margin,” ASME Report No. 99-GT-439.
20.
Boyle
,
R. J.
,
1994
, “
Prediction of Surface Roughness and Incidence Effects on Turbine Performance
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
116
, pp.
745
751
.
21.
Traupel, W., 1988, Thermische Turbomaschinen, Springer, Berlin.
22.
Radtke, F., and Dibelius, G., 1980, “Reynoldszahleinfluss bei hochbelasteten axialen Turbinenbeschaufelungen,” VDI-Berichte No. 361.
23.
Haq, I. U., Bu-Hazza, A. L., and Al-Baz, K., 1998, “Multistage Centrifugal Compressor Fouling Evaluation at High Power Settings,” ASME Report No. 98-GT-53.
24.
Cohen, H., Rogers, G. F. C., and Saravanamuttoo, H. I. H., 1996, Gas Turbine Theory, Longman, Harlow.
25.
Tarabrin, A. P., Schurovsky, V. A., Bodrov, A. I., and Stalder, J. P., 1998, “Influence of Axial Compressor Fouling on Gas Turbine Unit Performance Based on Different Schemes and With Different Initial Parameters,” ASME Report No. 98-GT-416.
26.
MacLeod, J. D., Taylor, V., and Laflamme, J. C. G., 1991, “Implanted Component Faults and Their Effects on Gas Turbine Engine Performance,” ASME Report No. 91-GT-41.
27.
Aker, G. F., and Saravanamuttoo, H. I. H., 1988, “Predicting the Gas Turbine Performance Degradation due to Compressor Fouling Using Computer Simulation Techniques,” ASME Report No. 88-GT-206.
You do not currently have access to this content.