Abstract

A thermal mixing analysis of the downcomer, main recirculation pumps (MRPs) and lower plenum of Forsmark’s Unit 3 has been carried out with three separate computational fluid dynamics models. Several difficulties with the boundary conditions have been encountered, particularly with the MRP model. The results obtained predict stable temperature differences of around 8 K at the core inlet. Such large temperature differences have never been observed at Forsmark nuclear power plant (NPP). Temperature measurements at four positions above the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) bottom give the mean value used as the core inlet temperature for core analyses. Even if the temperature transmitters used are rather slow and inaccurate, they should be able to detect such large temperature differences that may lead to fuel damage. The only damage reported at Forsmark NPP since the implementation of liner cladding in fuel design is that caused by mechanically induced debris fretting (threadlike particles). Also, the difficulties with the connection of the models throw some doubt on the accuracy of these predictions. A completely connected model of the same RPV volume covered by the separate models predicts temperature differences at core inlet that are almost one-fourth of those mentioned above, i.e., approximately 2.5 K. Most of the mixing occurs downstream of the MRP diffusers, at the lower plenum “inlet.” This prediction divergence seems to arise from an impossibility of a correct transfer of complete three-dimensional flow field properties by means of boundary conditions defined at a two-dimensional inlet section.

1.
Dimotakis
,
P. E.
, 2005, “
Turbulent Mixing
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
0066-4189,
37
, pp.
329
56
.
2.
Brodkey
,
R. S.
, 1967,
The Phenomena of Fluid Motions
,
Dover
,
New York
.
3.
ANSYS FLUENT
, 2006, “
FLUENT 6.3 Documentation
,” Fluent Inc., Lebanon, NH.
4.
Schmidt
,
E.
, and
Grigull
,
U.
, 1989,
Properties of Water and Steam in SI-Units
,
Springer-Verlag
,
Berlin, Germany
.
5.
Menter
,
F. R.
, 1994, “
Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
32
(
8
), pp.
1598
1605
.
6.
Tinoco
,
H.
,
Buchwald
,
P.
, and
Frid
,
W.
, 2007, “
Numerical Simulation of Boron Injection in a BWR
,”
12th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal-Hydraulics, NURETH 12
, Pittsburgh, PA, Sept. 30–Oct. 4.
7.
Hemström
,
B.
,
Lundström
,
A.
,
Tinoco
,
H.
, and
Ullberg
,
M.
, 1992, “
Flow Field Dependence of Reactor Water Chemistry in BWR
,”
Sixth International Conference on Water Chemistry of Nuclear Reactor Systems
, Bournemouth, UK, Oct. 12–15.
8.
Tinoco
,
H.
, and
Einarsson
,
T.
, 1997, “
Numerical Analysis of the Mixing and Recombination in the Downcomer of an Internal Pump BWR
,”
Eighth International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal-Hydraulics, NURETH 8
, Kyoto, Japan, Sept. 30–Oct. 4, pp.
806
816
.
9.
Ahlinder
,
S.
,
Tinoco
,
H.
, and
Ullberg
,
M.
, 2007, “
CFD Analysis of Recombination by HWC in the Downcomer of a BWR
,”
12th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal-Hydraulics, NURETH 12
, Pittsburgh, PA, Sept. 30–Oct. 4.
10.
Tinoco
,
H.
,
Ahlinder
,
S.
, and
Hedberg
,
P.
, 2007, “
Estimate of Core Shroud Temperature by Means of a CFD-Model of Core Bypass
,”
15th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, ICONE 15
, Nagoya, Japan, Apr. 22–26.
11.
Hisajima
,
K.
,
Uchida
,
K.
,
Matsumoto
,
K.
,
Kondo
,
K.
,
Yokoyama
,
S.
, and
Miyagawa
,
T.
, 2006, “
Development of 1000 MWE Advanced Boiling Water Reactor
,”
14th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, ICONE 14
, Miami, FL, Jul. 17–20.
12.
ABB Atom AB
, 1994, “
Core Master Documentation
,” POLCA User’s Manual, Västerås, Sweden, Vol.
6
.
13.
Bakker
,
A.
, and
LaRoche
,
R. D.
, 2000, “
Modeling of the Turbulent Flow in HEV Static Mixers
,” The Online CFM Book, http://www.bakker.org/cfmhttp://www.bakker.org/cfm.
14.
Tinoco
,
H.
, 2003, “
Two-Phase Flow in the Upper Plenum of a Boiling Nuclear Water Reactor
,”
Tenth International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics, NURETH 10
, Seoul, Korea, Oct. 5–9.
15.
Tinoco
,
H.
,
Adolfsson
,
E.
,
Baltyn
,
W.
, and
Marcinkiewicz
,
J.
, 2005, “
BWR ECCS—Thermal Loading Analysis of Internals Related to Spray System Removal
,”
13th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, ICONE 13
, Beijing, China, May 16–20.
16.
Launder
,
B. E.
,
Reece
,
G. J.
, and
Rodi
,
W.
, 1975, “
Progress in the Development of Reynolds-Stress Turbulence Closure
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
68
(
3
), pp.
537
566
.
18.
Menter
,
F.
, 2002, “
CFD Best Practice Guidelines for CFD Code Validation for Reactor-Safety Applications
,” UE/FP5 ECORA Project “Evaluation of Computational Fluid Dynamic Methods for Reactor Safety Analysis,” Germany, Paper No. EVOL-ECORA-D01.
19.
2000, “
Best Practice Guidelines
,” ERCOFTAC Special Interest Group on “Quality and Trust in Industrial CFD,”
M.
Casey
and
T.
Wintergerste
, eds., Sulzer Innotec, Version 1.0, Switzerland.
20.
Höhne
,
T.
, 2007, “
CFD-Simulations of Thermal Hydraulic Benchmark V1000CT-2 Using ANSYS CFX
,”
Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, ICONE 15
, Nagoya, Japan, Apr. 22–26.
21.
Moretti
,
F.
,
Melideo
,
D.
,
D’Auria
,
F.
,
Höhne
,
T.
, and
Kliem
,
S.
, 2007, “
CFX Simulations of ROCOM Slug Mixing Experiments
,”
Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, ICONE 15
, Nagoya, Japan, Apr. 22–26.
22.
Höhne
,
T.
,
Kliem
,
S.
, and
Bieder
,
U.
, 2006, “
Modeling of a Buoyancy-Driven Flow Experiment at the ROCOM Test Facility Using the CFD Codes CFX-5 and TRIO-U
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
0029-5493,
236
, pp.
1309
1325
.
You do not currently have access to this content.