Rankine and Brayton cycles are common energy conversion cycles and constitute the basis of a significant proportion of global electricity production. Even a seemingly marginal improvement in the efficiency of these cycles can considerably decrease the annual use of primary energy sources and bring a significant gain in power plant output. Recently, supercritical Brayton cycles using CO2 as the working fluid have attracted much attention, chiefly due to their high efficiency. As with conventional cycles, improving the compressor performance in supercritical cycles is major route to increasing the efficiency of the whole process. This paper numerically investigates the flow field and performance of a supercritical CO2 centrifugal compressor. A thermodynamic look-up table is coupled with the flow solver, and the look-up table is systematically refined to take into account the large variation of thermodynamic properties in the vicinity of the critical point. Effects of different boundary and operating conditions are also discussed. It is shown that the compressor performance is highly sensitive to the look-up table resolution as well as the operating and boundary conditions near the critical point. Additionally, a method to overcome the difficulties of simulation close to the critical point is explained.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
June 2018
Research-Article
Effects of Real Gas Model Accuracy and Operating Conditions on Supercritical CO2 Compressor Performance and Flow Field
Alireza Ameli,
Alireza Ameli
Mem. ASME
Laboratory of Fluid Dynamics,
School of Energy Systems,
Lappeenranta University of Technology,
Lappeenranta 53850, Finland
e-mail: Alireza.ameli@lut.fi
Laboratory of Fluid Dynamics,
School of Energy Systems,
Lappeenranta University of Technology,
Lappeenranta 53850, Finland
e-mail: Alireza.ameli@lut.fi
Search for other works by this author on:
Ali Afzalifar,
Ali Afzalifar
Laboratory of Fluid Dynamics,
School of Energy Systems,
Lappeenranta University of Technology,
Lappeenranta 53850, Finland
e-mail: Ali.afzalifar@lut.fi
School of Energy Systems,
Lappeenranta University of Technology,
Lappeenranta 53850, Finland
e-mail: Ali.afzalifar@lut.fi
Search for other works by this author on:
Teemu Turunen-Saaresti,
Teemu Turunen-Saaresti
Laboratory of Fluid Dynamics,
School of Energy Systems,
Lappeenranta University of Technology,
Lappeenranta 53850, Finland
e-mail: Teemu.turunen-saaresti@lut.fi
School of Energy Systems,
Lappeenranta University of Technology,
Lappeenranta 53850, Finland
e-mail: Teemu.turunen-saaresti@lut.fi
Search for other works by this author on:
Jari Backman
Jari Backman
Laboratory of Fluid Dynamics,
School of Energy Systems,
Lappeenranta University of Technology,
Lappeenranta 53850, Finland
e-mail: Jari.backman@lut.fi
School of Energy Systems,
Lappeenranta University of Technology,
Lappeenranta 53850, Finland
e-mail: Jari.backman@lut.fi
Search for other works by this author on:
Alireza Ameli
Mem. ASME
Laboratory of Fluid Dynamics,
School of Energy Systems,
Lappeenranta University of Technology,
Lappeenranta 53850, Finland
e-mail: Alireza.ameli@lut.fi
Laboratory of Fluid Dynamics,
School of Energy Systems,
Lappeenranta University of Technology,
Lappeenranta 53850, Finland
e-mail: Alireza.ameli@lut.fi
Ali Afzalifar
Laboratory of Fluid Dynamics,
School of Energy Systems,
Lappeenranta University of Technology,
Lappeenranta 53850, Finland
e-mail: Ali.afzalifar@lut.fi
School of Energy Systems,
Lappeenranta University of Technology,
Lappeenranta 53850, Finland
e-mail: Ali.afzalifar@lut.fi
Teemu Turunen-Saaresti
Laboratory of Fluid Dynamics,
School of Energy Systems,
Lappeenranta University of Technology,
Lappeenranta 53850, Finland
e-mail: Teemu.turunen-saaresti@lut.fi
School of Energy Systems,
Lappeenranta University of Technology,
Lappeenranta 53850, Finland
e-mail: Teemu.turunen-saaresti@lut.fi
Jari Backman
Laboratory of Fluid Dynamics,
School of Energy Systems,
Lappeenranta University of Technology,
Lappeenranta 53850, Finland
e-mail: Jari.backman@lut.fi
School of Energy Systems,
Lappeenranta University of Technology,
Lappeenranta 53850, Finland
e-mail: Jari.backman@lut.fi
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Turbomachinery Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received September 22, 2017; final manuscript received October 3, 2017; published online January 23, 2018. Editor: David Wisler.
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. Jun 2018, 140(6): 062603 (8 pages)
Published Online: January 23, 2018
Article history
Received:
September 22, 2017
Revised:
October 3, 2017
Citation
Ameli, A., Afzalifar, A., Turunen-Saaresti, T., and Backman, J. (January 23, 2018). "Effects of Real Gas Model Accuracy and Operating Conditions on Supercritical CO2 Compressor Performance and Flow Field." ASME. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. June 2018; 140(6): 062603. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038552
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Foreign Object Damage of Environmental Barrier Coatings Subjected to CMAS Attack
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Generative deep learning on images of thermo-mechanical simulation results
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Related Articles
Numerical Investigation of the Flow Behavior Inside a Supercritical CO 2 Centrifugal Compressor
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (December,2018)
Computational Fluid Dynamic Simulation of a Supercritical CO 2 Compressor Performance Map
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (July,2015)
Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics of a Closed Blade Cascade Wind Tunnel for Organic Vapors
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (May,2016)
Unsteady Computational Fluid Dynamics Investigation on Inlet Distortion in a Centrifugal Compressor
J. Turbomach (July,2010)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Pool Boiling
Thermal Management of Microelectronic Equipment, Second Edition
Introduction
Axial-Flow Compressors
Mass Data Processing Optimization on High Energy Physics Experiments
International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering, 4th (ICACTE 2011)