It is well known that there is a large variance associated with fatigue life. However, in literature little is found on the relationship between manufacturing processes and fatigue variance of the manufactured components. In this research, the influence of machining processes on the fatigue variance of the machined Ti 6Al-4V samples is studied experimentally. The impact is evaluated by comparing the safety ratios of face-turned samples with those of ground samples. The safety ratio is defined as the average fatigue life over the fatigue life with a reliability of 95%. In the computation, it is assumed that fatigue life follows Weibull distribution. Two sets of faced samples and two sets of ground samples are tested for bending fatigue. The test is under constant amplitude in high cycle fatigue regime under room temperature. The results show that the safety ratios of face-turned samples are significantly smaller than are those of ground samples. Consequently, it is suggested that fatigue life variance be considered as a new process capability. This capability serves as a basis in choosing manufacturing processes for making fatigue critical products such as aircraft. Another finding is the positive correlation between the residual stress variation and fatigue life variation. This correlation suggests that a better understanding and prediction of residual stress lead to a better prediction of fatigue life.

1.
Little, R. E., and Jebe, E. H., 1975, Statistical Design of Fatigue Experiments, John Wiley & Sons.
2.
ASTM, 1999, “Standard Practice for Statistical Analysis of Linear or Linearized Stress-Life (S-N) and Strain-Life (ε-N) Fatigue Data,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Section 3: Metals Test Methods and Analytical Procedures, Vol 03.01: Metals-Mechanical Testing, pp. 614–620.
3.
Military Handbook, 1994, Metallic Materials and Elements for Aerospace Vehicle Structures, Vol. 2, Department of Defense.
4.
Henry, S. D., et al., 1995, Fatigue Data Book: Light Structural Alloys, ASM International.
5.
Rice, R. C., Ed., Leise, B. N., and Nelson, D. V., Assoc. Eds., 1988, Fatigue Design Handbook, Society of Automotive Engineering.
6.
Young, L., and Ekvall, J. C., 1981, “Reliability of Fatigue Testing,” Statistical Analysis of Fatigue Data, ASTM STP 744, R. E. Little and J. C. Ekvall, Eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, pp. 55–74.
7.
Liu
,
C. R.
, and
Barash
,
M. M.
,
1976
, “
Variables Governing Patterns of Mechanical Residual Stress in a Machined Surface
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
104
, pp.
257
264
.
8.
Matsumoto
,
Y.
,
Barash
,
M. M.
, and
Liu
,
C. R.
,
1986
, “
Effect of Hardness on the Surface Integrity of AISI 4340 Steel
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
108
, pp.
169
175
.
9.
Jang
,
D. Y.
,
Watkins
,
T. R.
,
Kozaczek
,
K. J.
,
Hubbard
,
C. R.
, and
Cavin
,
O. B.
,
1996
, “
Surface Residual Stresses in Machined Austenitic Stainless Steel
,”
Wear
,
194
, pp.
168
173
.
10.
Mittal
,
S.
, and
Liu
,
C. R.
,
1998
, “
A Method of Modeling Residual Stresses in Superfinish Hard Turning
,”
Wear
,
218
, October, pp.
21
33
.
11.
Capello
,
E.
,
Davoli
,
P.
,
Bassanini
,
G.
, and
Bisi
,
A.
,
1999
, “
Residual Stresses and Surface Roughness in Turning
,”
ASME J. Eng. Mater. Technol.
,
121
, pp.
346
351
.
12.
Jacobus
,
K.
,
DeVor
,
R. E.
, and
Kapoor
,
S. G.
,
2000
, “
Machining-Induced Residual Stress: Experimentation and Modeling
,”
ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
,
122
, pp.
20
31
.
13.
Koster, W. P., 1991, “Effect of Residual Stress on Fatigue of Structural Alloys,” Practical Applications of Residual Stress Technology, Conference Proceedings, Indianapolis, Indiana, May 15–17 1991, pp. 1–9.
14.
Brinksmeier
,
E.
,
Cammett
,
J. T.
,
Konig
,
W.
,
Leskovar
,
P.
,
Peters
,
J.
, and
Tonshoff
,
H. K.
,
1982
, “
Residual Stresses-Measurement and Causes in Machining Processes,” Key-Note-Papers
CIRP Ann.
,
31
(
2
), pp.
491
510
.
15.
Koster, W. P., Field, M., Fritz, L. J., Gatto, L. R., and Kahles, J. F., 1970, “Surface Integrity of Machined Structural Components,” Technical Report AFML-TR-70-11, MMP Project Nr. 721–8.
16.
Liu
,
C. R.
, and
Mittal
,
S.
,
1998
, “
Optimal Pre-stressing the Surface of a Component by Superfinish Hard Turning for Maximum Fatigue Life in Rolling Contact
,”
Wear
,
219
, pp.
128
140
.
17.
Liu
,
C. R.
, and
Yang
,
Xiaoping
,
2001
, “
The Scatter to Surface Residual Stresses Produced by Face-Turning and Grinding
,”
Mach. Sci. Technol.
,
5
(
1
), pp.
1
21
.
18.
ASM Committee on Titanium and Titanium Alloys, 1981, “Heat Treating of Titanium and Titanium Alloys,” Metals Handbook, Vol. 4, pp. 763–774.
19.
Machinability Data Center, 1980, Machining Data Handbook, 3rd Edition, Machining Data Center, Cincinnati, OH.
20.
Noyan, I. C., and Cohen, J. B., 1987, Residual Stress: Measurement by Diffraction and Interpretation, Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
21.
Petzow, G., 1978, Metallographic Etching, American Society for Metals.
22.
Society of Automotive Engineers, 1971, “Residual Stress Measurement by X-Ray Diffraction,” SAE J 784a, SAE Information Report, pp. 61–62.
23.
Johnson, Richard A., 1994, Miller and Freund’s Probability and Statistics for Engineers, 5th Edition, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
24.
Dodson, Bryan, 1994, Weibull Analysis, ASQC Quality Press.
You do not currently have access to this content.