Regenerative chatter is known to be a key factor that limits the productivity of high speed machining. Consequently, a great deal of research has focused on developing predictive models of milling dynamics, to aid engineers involved in both research and manufacturing practice. Time-domain models suffer from being computationally intensive, particularly when they are used to predict the boundary of chatter stability, when a large number of simulation runs are required under different milling conditions. Furthermore, to identify the boundary of stability each simulation must run for sufficient time for the chatter effect to manifest itself in the numerical data, and this is a major contributor to the inefficiency of the chatter prediction process. In the present article, a new chatter criterion is proposed for time-domain milling simulations, that aims to overcome this drawback by considering the transient response of the modeled behavior, rather than the steady-state response. Using a series of numerical investigations, it is shown that in many cases the new criterion can enable the numerical prediction to be computed more than five times faster than was previously possible. In addition, the analysis yields greater detail concerning the nature of the chatter vibrations, and the degree of stability that is observed.

1.
Tlusty
,
J.
, and
Polacek
,
M.
, 1963, “
The Stability of the Machine Tool Against Self Excited Vibration in Machining
,”
ASME Proceedings of the Engineering Research Conference
, pp.
465
454
.
2.
Tobias
,
S. A.
, and
Fishwick
,
W.
, 1958, “
Theory of Regenerative Machine Tool Chatter
,”
Engineer (London)
0013-7758,
106
, pp.
199
203
.
3.
Smith
,
S.
, and
Tlusty
,
J.
, 1991, “
An Overview of Modeling and Simulation of the Milling Process
,”
J. Eng. Ind.
0022-0817,
113
, pp.
169
175
.
4.
Altintas
,
Y.
, and
Budak
,
E.
, 1995, “
Analytical Prediction of Stability Lobes in Milling
,”
CIRP Ann.
0007-8506,
44
, pp.
357
362
.
5.
Smith
,
S.
, and
Tlusty
,
J.
, 1990, “
Update on High-Speed Milling Dynamics
,”
J. Eng. Ind.
0022-0817,
112
, pp.
142
149
.
6.
Campomanes
,
M. L.
, and
Altintas
,
Y.
, 2003, “
An Improved Time Domain Simulation for Dynamic Milling at Small Radial Immersions
,”
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
1087-1357,
125
, pp.
416
422
.
7.
Li
,
H. Z.
,
Li
,
X. P. K.
,
, and
Chen
,
X. Q.
, 2003, “
A Novel Chatter Stability Criterion for the Modelling and Simulation of the Dynamic Milling Process in the Time Domain
,”
Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.
0268-3768,
22
(
9–10
), pp.
619
625
.
8.
Bayly
,
P. V.
,
Schmitz
,
T. L.
,
Stepan
,
G.
,
Mann
,
B. P.
,
Peters
,
D. A.
, and
Insperger
,
T.
, 2002, “
Effects of Radial Immersion and Cutting Direction on Chatter Stability in End Milling
,” ASME, New York,
MED-13
, pp.
351
363
.
9.
Schmitz
,
T. L.
,
Medicus
,
K.
, and
Dutterer
,
B.
, 2002, “
Exploring Once-Per-Revolution Audio Signal Variance as a Chatter Indicator
,”
Mach. Sci. Technol.
1091-0344,
6
(
2
), pp.
215
233
.
10.
Delio
,
T.
,
Tlusty
,
J.
, and
Smith
,
S.
, 1992, “
Use of Audio Signals for Chatter Detection and Control
,”
J. Eng. Ind.
0022-0817,
114
(
2
), pp.
146
157
.
11.
Rao
,
S. S.
, 2004,
Mechanical Vibrations
,
Prentice-Hall
, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
12.
Tlusty
,
J.
, 1999,
Manufacturing Processes and Equipment
,
Prentice-Hall
, New Jersey.
13.
CutPro, 2004, Manufacturing Automation Laboratories, Inc., Vancouver.
14.
MetalMax MilSim, 2004, Manufacturing Laboratories, Inc., Las Vegas.
15.
Matlab, 2004, The Mathworks, Inc., Natick.
16.
Kondo
,
E.
,
Ota
,
H.
, and
Kawai
,
T.
, 1997, “
New Method to Detect Regenerative Chatter Using Spectral Analysis, Part 1: Basic Study on Criteria for Detection of Chatter
,”
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
1087-1357,
119
, pp.
461
466
.
17.
Forsythe
,
G. E.
,
Malcolm
,
M. A.
, and
Moler
,
C. B.
, 1976,
Computer Methods for Mathematical Computations
,
Prentice-Hall
, New Jersey.
18.
Atkinson
,
L. V.
,
Harley
,
P. J.
, and
Hudson
,
J. D.
, 1989,
Numerical Methods with Fortran 77
,
Addison-Wesley
, England.
19.
Frigo
,
M.
, and
Johnson
,
S. G.
, 1998, “
FFTW: An Adaptive Software Architecture for the FFT
,” in
Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
, Vol.
3
, pp.
1381
1384
.
You do not currently have access to this content.