The pitch accuracy of a gear is graded on the order of 0.1μm in ISO 1328-1; therefore, it is necessary for gear measuring instruments (GMIs) to be able to measure gears with the required high accuracy. GMIs are evaluated by measuring a calibrated gear or a gearlike artifact. It is, however, difficult to obtain a measurement uncertainty of less than 0.1μm. The reason for this difficulty is that a gear artifact has a form error and surface roughness, and that the measurement position on the gear face differs slightly from the calibrated position. In view of this situation, we propose a novel multiball artifact (MBA), which is composed of equally spaced pitch balls, a centering ball, and a datum plane. The pitch balls are assumed to act as gear teeth by calibrating the angular pitch between the centers of each pitch ball. The centering ball and the datum plane are used to set a reference axis of the virtual gear. We manufactured an MBA with the pitch balls arranged on a curvic coupling. The angular pitch deviation between the centers of each pitch ball was calibrated using a coordinate measuring machine (CMM) and adopting the multiple-orientation technique. A master gear was also calibrated for comparison. The measurement uncertainty for the cumulative angular pitch deviation was 0.45 arc sec for the MBA and 1.58 arc sec for the master gear. The MBA could be calibrated with small uncertainty compared with the master gear. After the calibration, a virtual gear of the MBA was built using the calibration value. The virtual gear was measured using the gear-measuring software on the CMM. The measurement value was equal within the range of uncertainty of calibration value. It is verified that the superiority of the MBA to the gear artifact is due to the following reasons: (1) The balls can be manufactured with an accuracy of several tens of nanometers. (2) The calibrated result for the MBA is almost independent of a probe-positioning error because the centers of each pitch ball can be measured at multiple points. (3) In setting the reference axis, the gear artifact generally uses a datum cylinder, in contrast, the MBA uses more accurate ball.

1.
Goch
,
G.
, 2003, “
Gear Metrology
,”
CIRP Ann.
0007-8506,
52
, pp.
659
695
.
2.
Cylindrical Gear-ISO System of Accuracy
,” ISO 1328-1.
3.
Beyer
,
W.
, 1996, “
Traceable Calibration of Master Gears at PTB
,” American Gear Manufacturers Association Technical Paper No. 96FTM04.
4.
Haertig
,
F.
, and
Waeldele
,
F.
, 2001, “
Traceability of Gears—New Ideas, Recent Developments
,” American Gear Manufacturers Association Technical Paper No. 01FTM05.
5.
Haertig
,
F.
,
Keck
,
C.
,
Kniel
,
K.
,
Schwenke
,
H. I.
,
Wendt
,
K.
, and
Waeldele
,
F.
, 2003, “
Development of a Novel Gear Measuring Device of High Accuracy
,”
Proceedings of DECT’03 ASME 2003 Design Engineering Conference
, Chicago, IL, Vol.
22
, Issue No.
3
, Paper No. PTG-48105.
6.
Takeoka
,
F.
,
Komori
,
M.
,
Kubo
,
A.
,
Fujio
,
H.
,
Taniyama
,
S.
,
Ito
,
T.
,
Takatsuji
,
T.
,
Osawa
,
S.
, and
Sato
,
O.
, 2008, “
Design of Laser Interferometric Measuring Device of Involute Profile
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
130
(
5
), pp.
052602
.
7.
Minoura
,
K.
,
Ming
,
A.
,
Kanamori
,
T.
,
Kajitani
,
M.
,
Sato
,
T.
, and
Yuzaki
M.
, 2001, “
Development of Evaluation System for Gear Measuring Instruments (2nd Report)—Experimental Evaluation of Prototype Machines
,”
The Machine Design and Tribology Division Meeting in JSME 2001
, Vol.
1
, pp.
59
62
.
8.
Rolling Bearings—Balls—Dimensions and Tolerances
,” ISO 3290.
9.
Komori
,
M.
,
Osawa
,
S.
,
Sato
,
O.
,
Kiten
,
T.
,
Shirasaki
,
D.
, and
Takatsuji
,
T.
, 2008, “
Novel High-Precision Pitch Artifact Using Balls
,”
Key Eng. Mater.
1013-9826,
381–382
, pp.
95
96
.
10.
Kondo
,
Y.
,
Sasajima
,
K.
,
Osawa
,
S.
,
Sato
,
O.
, and
Komori
,
M.
, 2008, “
Pitch Measurement of a New Multi-Ball Artifact
,”
Proceedings of the Euspen International Conference
, Zurich, Vol.
1
, pp.
348
352
.
11.
Komori
,
M.
,
Li
,
H.
,
Takeoka
,
F.
,
Osawa
,
S.
,
Sato
,
O.
,
Kiten
,
T.
,
Shirasaki
,
D.
, and
Kondo
,
Y.
, 2009, “
Design and Error Analysis of Multiball Artifact Composed of Simple Features to Evaluate Pitch Measurement Accuracy
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
131
(
4
), p.
041006
.
12.
Kondo
,
K.
, and
Mizutani
,
H.
, 2002, “
Measurement Uncertainty of Tooth Profile by Master Balls
,”
VDI-Ber.
0083-5560,
1665
, pp.
797
810
.
13.
Kubo
,
A.
,
Kondo
,
K.
,
Takatsuji
,
T.
,
Haertig
,
F.
,
Komori
,
M.
,
Osawa
,
S.
, and
Naoi
,
K.
, 2005, “
Calibration System of Involute Tooth Form Checker Using Ball Artifact
,”
VDI-Ber.
0083-5560,
1904
, pp.
505
521
.
14.
Masuda
,
T.
, and
Kajitani
,
M.
, 1985, “
Automatic Calibration System for Polygon
,”
Precis. Eng.
0141-6359,
7
(
1
), pp.
15
21
.
15.
Masuda
,
T.
, and
Kajitani
,
M.
, 1989, “
An Automatic Calibration System for Angular Encoders
,”
Precis. Eng.
0141-6359,
11
(
2
), pp.
95
100
.
16.
Evans
,
C.
,
Hocken
,
R.
, and
Estler
,
W.
, 1996, “
Self-Calibration: Reversal, Redundancy, Error Separation, and ‘Absolute Testing’
,”
CIRP Ann.
0007-8506,
45
(
2
), pp.
617
634
.
17.
Mark
,
W. D.
, 1998, “
Method for Precision Calibration of Rotary Scale Errors and Precision Determination of Gear Tooth Index Errors
,”
Mech. Syst. Signal Process.
0888-3270,
12
(
6
), pp.
723
752
.
18.
Osawa
,
S.
,
Busch
,
K.
,
Frank
,
M.
, and
Schwenke
,
H.
, 2005, “
Multiple Orientation Technique for the Calibration of Cylindrical Work Pieces on CMMs
,”
Precis. Eng.
0141-6359,
29
(
1
), pp.
56
64
.
19.
Osawa
,
S.
,
Sato
,
O.
, and
Takatsuji
,
T.
, 2008, “
Multiple Measurement Techniques for Coordinate Metrology
,”
Key Eng. Mater.
1013-9826,
381–382
, pp.
93
94
.
20.
Cox
,
B.
, 1999, “
Measurement Uncertainty for Pitch and Runout Artifacts
,” American Gear Manufacturers Association Technical Paper No. 99FTM03.
21.
Frazer
,
R. C.
,
Mancasola
,
P.
, and
Mikoleizig
,
G.
, 2003, “
A New Calibration Facility for the UK’s National Gear Metrology Laboratory
,”
Proceedings of the DECT’03 ASME 2003 Design Engineering Conference
, Chicago, IL, Vol.
22
, Issue No.
3
, Paper No. PTG-48106.
22.
Haertig
,
F.
, and
Kniel
,
K.
, 2007, “
Fehlertrennverfahren: ein Weg zu hochgenauen Verzahnungsmessungen
,”
GETPRO—Kongress zur Getriebeproduktion
, Wuerzburg, Germany.
You do not currently have access to this content.