Determining tearing concerns in numerical simulations of sheet metal components is difficult since the traditional failure criterion, which is strain-based, exhibits a strain path dependence. A stress-based, as opposed to a strain-based, failure criterion has been proposed and demonstrated analytically, experimentally in tube forming, and through numerical simulations. The next step in this progression to the acceptance of a stress-based forming limit diagram is to demonstrate how this failure criterion can be used to predict failure of sheet metal parts in numerical simulations. In this paper, numerical simulation results for dome height specimens are presented and compared to experimental data. This procedure was repeated for various yield criteria to examine the effect of this parameter on the ability to predict failure in the numerical simulations. Reasonable agreement was obtained comparing the failure predicted from numerical simulations and those found experimentally, in particular for the yield criterion which has been shown to best characterize the material used in this study.

1.
Keeler
,
S. P.
, 1966, “
Determination of Forming Limits in Automotive Stampings
,” Transactions of Society of Automotive Engineers, Paper No. 650355.
2.
Goodwin
,
G. M.
, 1968, “
Application of Strain Analysis to Sheet Metal Forming Problems in the Press Shop
,” Transactions of Society of Automotive Engineers, Paper No. 680093.
3.
Graf
,
A.
, and
Hosford
,
W.
, 1993, “
Effect of Changing Strain Paths of Forming Limit Diagrams of Al 2008-T4
,”
Metall. Trans. A
0360-2133,
24A
, pp.
2503
2512
.
4.
Laukonis
,
J. V.
, and
Ghosh
,
A. K.
, 1976, “
Effects of Strain Path Changes on the Formability of Sheet Metals
,”
Metall. Trans. A
0360-2133,
9A
(
12
), pp.
1849
1856
.
5.
Arrieux
,
R.
, 1987, “
Determination of the Forming Limit Stress Curve for Anisotropic Sheets
,”
CIRP Ann.
0007-8506,
36
, pp.
195
198
.
6.
Gese
,
H.
,
Dell
,
H.
,
Kebler
,
L.
,
Hooputra
,
H.
, and
Werner
,
H.
, 2001, “
Continuous Failure Prediction Model for Non Linear Load Paths in Successive Stamping and Crash Processes
,” Transactions of Society of Automotive Engineers, Paper No. 2001-01-1131.
7.
Marciniak
,
Z.
, and
Kuczynski
,
K.
, 1967, “
Limit Strains in the Processes of Stretch Forming Sheet Steel
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
0020-7403,
9
, pp.
609
620
.
8.
Lee
,
D.
, and
Zaverl
,
F.
, 1982, “
Neck Growth and Forming Limits in Sheet Metals
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
0020-7403,
24
, pp.
157
173
.
9.
Chan
,
K. S.
, 1985, “
Effects of Plastic Anisotropic and Yield Surface Shape on Sheet Metal Stretchability
,”
Metall. Trans. A
0360-2133,
16A
, pp.
629
639
.
10.
Stoughton
,
T. B.
, 2001, “
Stress-Based Forming Limits in Sheet-Metal Forming
,”
J. Eng. Mater. Technol.
0094-4289,
123
, pp.
417
422
.
11.
Stoughton
,
T. B.
, 2002, “
The Influence of the Material Model on the Stress-based Forming Limit Criterion
,” SAE Paper No. 2002-01-0157.
12.
Lege
,
D.
,
Barlat
,
F.
, and
Brem
,
J. C.
, 1989, “
Characterization and Modeling of the Mechanical Behaviour and Formability of a 2008-T4 Sheet Sample
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
0020-7403,
31
(
7
), pp.
549
563
.
13.
Hill
,
R.
, 1948, “
A Theory of the Yielding and Plastic Flow of Anisotropic Metals
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
1364-5021,
193
, pp.
281
297
.
14.
Janssens
,
K.
,
Lambert
,
F.
,
Vanrostenberghe
,
S.
, and
Vermeulen
,
M.
, 2001, “
Statistical Evaluation of the Uncertainty of Experimentally Characterised Forming Limits of Sheet Metal
,”
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
0924-0136,
112
, pp.
174
184
.
15.
Logan
,
R.
, and
Hosford
,
W. F.
, 1980, “
Upper-Bound Anisotropic Yield Locus Calculations Assuming ⟨111⟩ Pencil Glide
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
0020-7403,
22
(
7
), pp.
419
430
.
16.
Haddad
,
A.
,
Arrieux
,
R.
, and
Vacher
,
P.
, 2000, “
Use of Two Behaviour Laws for the Determination of the Forming Limit Stress Diagram of a Thin Steel Sheet
,”
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
0924-0136,
106
, pp.
49
53
.
17.
Wu
,
P. D.
,
Graf
,
A.
,
MacEwen
,
S. R.
,
Lloyd
,
D. J.
,
Jain
,
M.
, and
Neale
,
K. W.
, 2005, “
On Forming Limit Stress Diagram Analysis
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
0020-7683,
42
, pp.
2225
2241
.
18.
Stoughton
,
T. B.
, and
Zhu
,
X.
, 2004, “
Review of Theoretical Models of the Strain-Based FLD and their Relevance to the Stress-Based FLD
,”
Int. J. Plast.
0749-6419,
20
, pp.
1463
1486
.
19.
Yoshida
,
K.
,
Kuwabara
,
T.
,
Narihara
,
K.
, and
Takahashi
,
S.
, 2005, “
Experimental Verification of the Path-Independence of Forming Limit Stresses
,”
Int. J. Form. Processes
1292-7775,
8
, Special Issue, pp.
283
298
.
20.
Moondra
,
S.
, and
Kinsey
,
B.
, 2004, “
Evaluation of Cruciform Specimens for Stress-Based Forming Limit Diagram Validation
,”
Trans. North Am. Manuf. Res. Inst. SME
1047-3025,
32
, pp.
247
254
.
21.
Moondra
,
S.
, 2004, “
Numerical Simulation Investigations to Support a Stress-Based Failure Criterion for Sheet Metal Forming
,” Master’s thesis, University of New Hampshire, Durham.
22.
Talyan
,
V.
,
Wagoner
,
R. H.
, and
Lee
,
J. K.
, 1998, “
Formability of Stainless steel
,”
Metall. Mater. Trans. A
1073-5623,
29A
, pp.
2161
2172
.
23.
Kinsey
,
B.
, and
Sakash
,
A.
, 2006, “
Evaluation of Stress Saturation Effect with a Stress-Based Failure Criterion for Sheet Metal Using Numerical Simulations
,” Transactions of Society of Automotive Engineers, Paper No. 06M-213.
You do not currently have access to this content.