In this paper, a method to manage the actuator parameters of a serial chain mechanism composed of revolute joints to achieve improved responsiveness characteristics (acceleration capability) based on the basic geometric parameters of the mechanism is presented. Here, an analytic framework presented by the authors in an earlier work, which exploits the geometric structure of this type of mechanism is extended to address the tool-point mass and acceleration. The manipulator’s geometry is reduced to a set of lengths, which are representative of the mechanical gains associated with the manipulator and they, along with the transmission ratio of the actuators, are used to map the actuator parameters to their effective values at the tool-point where a direct comparison to the task requirements can be made. With this method, minimal computations are required to evaluate the system’s performance since only the forward kinematic computations are required. The effects of the actuator transmission ratio parameter on the effective tool-point force, mass, and acceleration are investigated for a six-DOF serial chain manipulator. Through this case study, it is demonstrated how the transmission ratio is managed to balance the system’s effective tool-point force and mass to obtain an optimal tool-point acceleration. In addition to the investigation of the effects of the actuator parameters, the method is shown to be useful in the solution of the configuration management or modular design problem since the exponential design space can be searched for a globally optimal solution with minimal computations. The goal of the configuration management problem is to quickly configure and/or reconfigure a robotic manipulator from a finite set of actuator modules.

1.
Asada
,
H.
, 1983, “
A Geometrical Representation of Manipulator Dynamics and Its Application to Arm Design
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
0022-0434,
105
(
3
), pp.
131
135
.
2.
Yoshikawa
,
T.
, 1985, “
Dynamic Manipulability of Robot Manipulators
,”
Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
, pp.
1033
1038
.
3.
Chiacchio
,
P.
,
Chiaverini
,
S.
,
Sciavicco
,
L.
, and
Siciliano
,
B.
, 1991, “
Reformulation of Dynamic Manipulability Ellipsoid for Robotic Manipulators
,”
IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
, pp.
2192
2197
.
4.
Graettinger
,
T. J.
, and
Krogh
,
B. H.
, 1988, “
The Acceleration Radius: A Global Performance Measure for Robotic Manipulators
,”
IEEE J. Rob. Autom.
0882-4967,
4
(
1
), pp.
60
69
.
5.
Bowling
,
A.
, and
Khatib
,
O.
, 1995, “
Analysis of the Acceleration Characteristics of Non-Redundant Manipulators
,”
IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
, pp.
323
328
.
6.
Bowling
,
A.
, and
Khatib
,
O.
, 2005, “
The Dynamic Capability Equations: A New Tool for Analyzing Robotic Manipulator Performance
,”
IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.
1042-296X,
21
(
1
), pp.
115
123
.
7.
Thomas
,
M.
,
Yuan-Chou
,
H. C.
, and
Tesar
,
D.
, 1985, “
Optimal Actuator Sizing for Robotic Manipulators Based on Local Dynamic Criteria
,”
ASME J. Mech., Trans., Autom. Des.
,
107
, pp.
163
169
.
8.
Pholsiri
,
C.
,
Kapoor
,
C.
, and
Tesar
,
D.
, 2004, “
Manipulator Task-Based Performance Optimization
,”
ASME
Paper No. DETC2004-57447.
9.
Matone
,
R.
, and
Roth
,
B.
, 1998, “
The Effects of Actuation Schemes on the Dynamic Performance of Serial Manipulators
,”
CISM-IFToMM Symposium on Theory and Practice of Robots and Manipulators (RoManSy-12)
.
10.
Kovecses
,
J.
,
Fenton
,
R. G.
, and
Cleghorn
,
W. L.
, 2001, “
Effects of Joint Dynamics on the Dynamic Manipulability of Geared Robotic Manipulators
,”
Mechatronics
0957-4158,
11
, pp.
43
58
.
11.
Rios
,
O.
, and
Tesar
,
D.
, 2009, “
Actuator Gain Distributions to Analytically Meet Specified Performance Capabilities in Serial Robotic Manipulators
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
131
(
2
), p.
021010
.
12.
Ambrose
,
R.
, 1991, “
Design, Construction and Demonstration of Modular, Reconfigurable Robots
,” Ph.D., Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
13.
Paredis
,
C. J. J.
,
Brown
,
H. B.
, and
Khosla
,
P. K.
, 1997, “
A Rapidly Deployable Manipulator System
,”
Robot. Auton. Syst.
,
21
, pp.
289
304
. 0921-8890
14.
Farritor
,
S.
, and
Dubowsky
,
S.
, 2001, “
On Modular Design of Field Robotic Systems
,”
Auton. Rob.
0929-5593,
10
, pp.
57
65
.
15.
Chen
,
I. M.
, and
Burdick
,
J. W.
, 1995, “
Determining Task Optimal Modular Robot Assembly Configurations
,”
IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
, pp.
132
137
.
16.
Tesar
,
D.
, 2004, “
Modular Educational Robot Systems
,” White Paper, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
17.
Thomas
,
M.
, and
Tesar
,
D.
, 1982, “
Dynamic Modeling of Serial Manipulator Arms
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
0022-0434,
104
, pp.
218
228
.
18.
Walker
,
M. W.
, and
Orin
,
D. E.
, 1982, “
Efficient Dynamic Computer Simulation of Robotic Mechanisms
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
0022-0434,
104
, pp.
205
211
.
19.
Featherstone
,
R.
, 1987,
Robot Dynamics Algorithms
,
Kluwer Academic
,
Dordrecht, The Netherlands
.
20.
Yoshikawa
,
T.
, 1991, “
Translational and Rotational Manipulability of Robotic Manipulators
,”
International Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics Society
, pp.
1170
1175
.
21.
Strang
,
G.
, 1988,
Linear Algebra and Its Applications
,
Harcourt Brace Jovanovitch
,
San Diego, CA
.
22.
Vaculik
,
S.
, 2008, “
A Framework for Electromechanical Actuator Design
,” Ph.D., Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
23.
Tal
,
J.
, and
Kahne
,
S.
, 1972, “
The Selection of Variable Gear for Minimum Energy
,”
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control
0018-9286,
17
, pp.
353
358
.
24.
Chiacchio
,
C.
, and
Concilio
,
M.
, 1998, “
The Dynamic Manipulability Ellipsoid for Redundant Manipulators
,”
IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
, pp.
95
100
.
25.
Khatib
,
O.
, 1995, “
Inertial Properties in Robotic Manipulation: An Object-Level Framework
,”
Int. J. Robot. Res.
0278-3649,
14
(
1
), pp.
19
36
.
You do not currently have access to this content.