This work focuses on the safety analysis of a typical pressurized water reactor (PWR) for reactivity-initiated transients. These transients result from withdrawal of six sets of groups of control rods that may occur under control systems or other faults. NEA/OECD PWR benchmark is considered for the study. A 3D space–time kinetics code, “TRIKIN” (neutronic and thermal-hydraulics coupled code) is used to account for local changes in the neutron flux. These local changes in the neutron flux affect the total reactivity, local power, and temperature distribution. The safety parameters are the usual 3D radial power distribution, flux tilt, axial heat flux for the peak channel, and radial peak central line temperature profiles over the horizontal plane. These safety parameters studied in the incident progression up to reactor SCRAM level. The minimum departure from the nucleate boiling ratio (MDNBR) has been investigated quantitatively for all six cases. The case that gives maximum drop in MDNBR at SCRAM level is identified and its consequences are discussed. The study is of high importance in revealing the importance of grouping of control rods’ configurations, providing insight in developing strategy for designing the configuration and reactivity worth of groups of control rods and local/global reactor control systems for large-size PWRs.

References

1.
Perez
,
R.
, and
Golbabai
,
M.
,
1995
, .
2.
Lee
,
J. K.
, and
Han
,
B. S.
,
1998
, “
Modeling of Core Protection and Monitoring System for PWR Nuclear Power Plant Simulator
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
25
(
7
), pp. 
409
420
.10.1016/S0306-4549(97)00075-3
3.
Kim
,
H. C.
, and
Chang
,
S. H.
,
1997
, “
Development of a Back Propagation Network for One-Step Transient DNBR Calculations
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
24
(
17
), pp. 
1437
1446
.10.1016/S0306-4549(97)00051-0
4.
Lee
,
G. C.
, and
Chang
,
S. H.
,
2003
, “
Radial Basis Function Networks Applied to DNBR Calculation in Digital Core Protection Systems
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
30
, pp. 
1561
1572
.10.1016/S0306-4549(03)00099-9
5.
Chang
,
S. H.
, and
Baek
,
W. P.
,
2003
, “
Understanding, Predicting and Enhancing Critical Heat Flux
,”
10th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics (NURETH-10)
,
Seoul, Korea
.
6.
Yang
,
S. H.
,
Chung
,
Y. J.
, and
Kim
,
H. C.
,
2005
, “
Assessment of the MDNBR Enhancement Methodologies for the SMART Control Rods Banks Withdrawal Event
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
32
, pp. 
1567
1583
.10.1016/j.anucene.2005.04.009
7.
Yasinsky
,
J. B.
, and
Henry
,
A. F.
,
1965
, “
Some Numerical Experiments Concerning Space-Time Reactor Kinetics Behavior
,”
Nucl. Sci. Eng.
,
22
, pp. 
171
181
.
8.
Stacy
,
W. M.
,
1968
, “
A Variational Multichannel Space-Time Synthesis Method for Nonseparable Reactor Transients
,”
Nucl. Sci. Eng.
,
34
(
1
), pp. 
45
56
.
9.
Adams
,
C. H.
, and
Stacy
,
W. M.
,
1967
, “
RAUMZEIT: A Program to Solve Coupled Time Dependent Diffusion Equations in One Space Dimension
,” .
10.
Fuller
,
E. L.
,
Meneley
,
D. A.
, and
Hetrick
,
D. L.
,
1970
, “
Weighted Residual Methods in Space Dependent Reactor Dynamics
,”
Nucl. Sci. Eng.
,
40
(
2
), pp. 
206
223
.
11.
Ott
,
K. O.
, and
Meneley
,
D. A.
,
1969
, “
Accuracy of the Quasistatic Treatment of Spatial Reactor Kinetics
,”
Nucl. Sci. Eng.
,
36
(
3
), pp. 
402
411
.10.13182/NSE36-402
12.
Meneley
,
D. A.
,
Ott
,
K. O.
, and
Wiener
,
E. S.
,
1967
, “
Space Time Kinetics
,” .
13.
Diamond
,
D. J.
, et al,
2001
, “
Intercomparison of Results for a PWR Rod Ejection Accident
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
208
, pp.
181
189
.
14.
Nakajima
,
T.
,
2002
, “
Realistic Analysis of RIA in PWR and BWR
,”
Proceedings of the Topical Meeting on RIA
,
Aix-en-Provence, France
.
15.
Riverola
,
J.
,
Nunez
,
T.
, and
Vicente
,
J.
,
2004
, “
RIA Analysis for PWR at Both HZP and HFP Operation and All Cycle Fuel Exposure with 3D Techniques
,”
Proceedings of the 2004 International Meeting on LWR Fuel Performance
,
Orlando, FL
.
16.
Kozlowski
,
T.
, and
Downar
,
T. J.
,
2007
, “
PWR MOX/UO2 Core Transient Benchmark
,” OECD/NEA No. 6048, NEA/NSC/DOC(2006)20.
17.
Grgic
,
D.
,
Bencik
,
V.
, and
Sadek
,
S.
,
2013
, “
Coupled Code Calculation of Rod Withdrawal at Power Accident
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
261
, pp. 
285
305
.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.10.026
18.
Gensler
,
A.
,
Kuhnel
,
K.
, and
Kuch
,
S.
,
2015
, “
PWR Core Safety Analysis with 3-Dimensional Methods
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
84
, pp. 
131
139
.10.1016/j.anucene.2014.11.006
19.
Turinsky
,
P. J.
,
Al-Chalabi
,
R. M. K.
,
Engrand
,
P.
,
Sarsour
,
H. N.
,
Faure
,
F. X.
, and
Guo
,
W.
,
1994
, “
NESTLE: Few-Group Neutron Diffusion Equation Solver Utilizing the Nodal Expansion Method for Eigenvalue, Adjoint, Fixed-Source Steady State and Transient Problems
,”
Electric Power Research Center, North Carolina State University
, Raleigh, NC.
20.
Grundmann
,
U.
, and
Rohde
,
U.
,
1996
, “
DYN3D—3-Dimensional Core Model for Steady-State and Transient Analyses of Thermal Reactors
,”
International Conference on the Physics of Reactors PHYSOR 96
,
Mito, Ibaraki, Japan
.
21.
Ivanov
,
K. N.
,
Macian-Juan
,
R.
,
Irani
,
A.
, and
Baratta
,
A. J.
,
1999
, “
Features and Performance of a Coupled Three-Dimensional Thermal-hydraulic/Kinetics TRAC-PF1/NEM PWR Analysis Code
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
26
, pp. 
1407
1417
.10.1016/S0306-4549(99)00017-1
22.
Downar
,
T.
,
Lee
,
D.
,
Xu
,
Y.
, and
Kozlowski
,
T.
,
2004
, “
PARC v2.6: U.S. NRC Core Neutronics Simulator, Theory Manual
,”
Purdue University
, West Lafayette, IN.
23.
Kereszturi
,
A.
, et al,
2003
, “
Development and Validation of the Three-Dimensional Dynamic Code KIKO3-D
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
30
, pp. 
93
120
.10.1016/S0306-4549(02)00043-9
24.
Obaidurrahman
,
K.
,
Doshi
,
J. B.
,
Jain
,
R. P.
, and
Jagannathan
,
V.
,
2010
, “
Development and Validation of Coupled Dynamics Code TRIKIN for VVER Reactors
,”
Nucl. Eng. Technol.
,
42
(
3
), pp. 
259
270
.10.5516/NET.2010.42.3.259
25.
Fraikin
,
R.
, and
Finnemann
,
H.
,
1993
, “
NEA-NSC 3-D/1-D PWR Core Transient Benchmark: Uncontrolled Withdrawal of Control Rods at Zero Power, Final Specifications
,” .
26.
Jagannathan
,
V.
,
Singh
,
T.
,
Pal
,
U.
,
Karthikeyan
,
R.
, and
Sundaram
,
G.
,
2006
, “
Validation of Finite Difference Core Diffusion Calculation Methods with FEM and NEM for VVER-1000 MWe Reactor
,”
PHYSOR-2006, ANS Topical Meeting on Reactor Physics
,
Vancouver, BC, Canada
.
27.
Sanchez
,
J.
,
1989
, “
On the Numerical Solution of the Point Reactor Equations by Generalized Runge-Kutta Methods
,”
Nucl. Sci. Eng.
,
103
(
1
), pp. 
94
99
.
28.
Obaidurrahman
,
K.
,
2011
, “
Spatial Instability Analysis in Large Light Water Reactors
,” Ph.D. thesis,
Department of Energy Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
, Mumbai, India.
29.
Jain
,
R. P.
, and
Obaidurrahman
,
K.
,
2012
, “
Validation of 3D Kinetics Code TRIKIN Using OECD PWR Core Transient Benchmark
,”
Int. J. Nucl. Energy Sci. Technol.
,
7
(
2
), pp. 
131
142
.10.1504/IJNEST.2012.048814
30.
Tong
,
L. S.
,
1967
, “
Heat Transfer in Water-Cooled Nuclear Reactors
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
6
, pp. 
301
324
.10.1016/0029-5493(67)90111-2
31.
Todreas
,
N. E.
, and
Kazimi
,
M. S.
,
1990
,
Nuclear Systems-I: Thermal Hydraulic Fundamentals
,
Hemisphere Publishing
,
New York
.
You do not currently have access to this content.