Abstract

This paper presents the work carried out in Experimental and design organization OKB “GIDROPRESS” to justify the separation characteristics of VVER-TOI steam generator (SG) using the STAR-CCM+ CFD-code. In the VVER-TOI project, new layout solutions were applied in the reactor plant as part of which the steam removal system from the SG was changed. Namely, in contrast to the VVER-1000 and VVER-1200 where the steam removal was organized through ten nozzles combined into a steam collector, in the VVER-TOI SG the steam removal was arranged through one nozzle located on the cold collector side. This change leads to the formation of a nonuniform velocity field in the separation volume, between the evaporation surface and the distribution perforated plate (DPP), and can lead to the excessive increase of steam humidity. To ensure the steam separation characteristics of a horizontal SG with one steam nozzle, it was proposed to create a nonuniform resistance on the way of steam motion from the evaporation surface into steam nozzle applying a nonuniform degree of the DPP perforation. Two computer models of the SG steam volume with different steam removal schemes (through one and ten nozzles) were developed, a set of studies on verification and validation was carried out and a set of calculations were performed. According to the results of the calculations, the necessity of introducing a nonuniform degree of the DPP perforation was justified. Further, to determine the nonuniform degree of DPP perforation, a set of optimization calculations of the SG steam volume with one steam removal nozzle was performed. The nonuniform degree of DPP perforation of the VVER-TOI SG was selected, which provide steam velocity distribution as close as possible to the SG with ten steam nozzles. To justify the chosen design, sensitivity analysis was also carried out according to the hole diameters tolerance and steam load profile.

References

1.
Berkovich
,
V. Y.
, and
Semchenkov
,
Y. M.
,
2012
, “
Perspective Projects for VVER Reactor Plants
,”
Proceedings of Eighth International Scientific and Technical Conference “Safety, Efficiency and Economics of Nuclear Energy
”, Moscow, Russia (in Russian).
2.
Bugaev
,
D. V.
,
2014
, VVER-TOI Project: A Brief Description of the Main Technological Innovations,
Atomstroystandart
,
Moscow, Russia
, ATOMSTROYSTANDART (in Russian).
3.
Trunov
,
N. B.
,
Logvinov
,
S. A.
, and
Dragunov
,
Y. G.
,
2001
,
Hydrodynamic and Thermochemical Processes in Steam Generators of Nuclear Power Plants With VVER
,
Energoatomizdat
, Moscow, Russia, p.
318
(in Russian).
4.
Ageev
,
A. G.
,
Karasev
,
V. B.
,
Serov
,
I. T.
, and
Ttov
,
V. F.
,
1982
,
Separation Devices of Nuclear Power Plants
,
Energoizdat
, Moscow, Russia, p.
169
(in Russian).
5.
Novoselsky
,
O. Yu.
,
Safonov
,
V. K.
, and
Shishov
,
A. V.
,
2005
,
RBMK Steam Separators
,
Gup Nikiet
, Moscow, Russia, p.
187
(in Russian).
6.
Trunov
,
N. B.
,
Sotskov
,
V. V.
, and
Levchenko
,
Y. D.
,
2008
,
Improved PGV-1500 Separation System
,
Heavy Machine-Building Industry Publishers
, pp.
8
13
. (in Russian).
7.
Efanov
,
АD.
,
Levchenko
,
Y. D.
,
Musikhin
,
Y. A.
,
Sotskov
,
V. V.
, and
Trunov
,
N. B.
,
2007
, “
The Study of Variable Perforation of the Steam Receiving Hole Sheet PGV-1500
,”
Proc. of the Fifth International Scientific and Technical Conference “Safety Assurance of NPP with VVER”
, Podolsk, Russia, May 29–June 1, p.
9
(in Russian).
8.
Volkov
,
V. Yu.
,
Golibrodo
,
L. A.
,
Krutikov
,
A. A.
,
Kudryavtsev
,
O. V.
,
Nadinsky
,
Y. N.
,
Nechaev
,
A. T.
, and
Skibin
,
A. P.
,
2017
, “
Multi-Scale Problems of Heat and Mass Transfer in Nuclear Industry
,”
Bull. South Ural State Univ. Ser.: Comput. Math. Software Eng.
,
6
(
4
), pp.
60
73
(in Russian).10.14529/cmse170405
9.
Golibrodo
,
L. A.
,
2017
, “
Mathematical Modeling of Steam Separation in Steam Generators of VVER Nuclear Power Plants Based on Numerical Heat and Mass Transfer Using CFD Codes
,” Ph.D. thesis, OKB “GIDROPRESS,” Podolsk, Russia, p.
138
(in Russian).
10.
Crowe
,
C. T.
,
1991
, “
The State-of-the-Art in the Development of Numerical Models for Dispersed Phase Flows
,”
Proceedings of the International Conference on Multiphase Flows
, Tsukuba, Japan, Nov. 4–7, pp.
49
60
.
11.
Crowe
,
C. T.
,
Schwarzkopf
,
J. D.
,
Sommerfeld
,
M.
, and
Tsuji
,
Y.
,
2012
,
Multiphase Flows With Droplets and Particles
, 2nd ed.,
CRC Press
, Boca Raton, FL, p.
487
.
12.
Kutateladze
,
S. S.
, and
Styrikovich
,
M. A.
,
1976
, “
Hydrodynamics of Gas-Liquid Systems
,” Energy, 4, pp. 41–51 (in Russian).
13.
Ageev
,
A. G.
,
Belov
,
V. I.
, and
Vasilieva
,
R. V.
,
1988
, “
Experimental and Analytical Study of the Limiting Loads Under Gravitational Separation
,”
Thermalhydrodynamic Processes in the Nuclear Power Equipment Components: Collection of Scientific Works
,
Enin
,
Moscow, Russia
, Feb. 19–22, pp.
41
51
(in Russian).
14.
Nuclear Energy Agency Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations
,
2007
, “
Best Practice Guidelines for the Use of CFD in Nuclear Reactor Safety Applications
,” Nuclear Energy Agency of the OECD (NEA), Paris, France, Report No. NEA/CSNI/R(2007)5.
15.
Zigh
,
G.
, and
Solis
,
J.
,
2013
, “
Computational Fluid Dynamics Best Practice Guidelines for Dry Cask Applications
,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, Report NUREG-2152.
16.
Siemens PLM Software
,
2017
, “
STAR-CCM+ Documentation Version 12.02
,” Fizmatlit (Publishing House of Physics and Mathematics), Moscow, Russia, p.
11271
.
17.
Idelchik
,
I. E.
,
1992
,
Handbook of Hydraulic Resistance
, 3rd ed., Mechanical engineering,
Moscow
, Russia, p.
672
(in Russian).
18.
Database of Experimental Data ERCOFTAC
, 2020, “
Interactive Resource
,” ERCOFTAC, accessed Sept. 3, 2020, http://cfd.mace.manchester.ac.uk/ercoftac
19.
Repik
,
E. U.
, and
Sosedko
,
Y. P.
,
2002
,
Control of the Turbulent Flows
,
Publishing House of Physics and Mathematics
, Moscow, Russia, p.
244
(in Russian).
20.
Golibrodo
,
L. A.
,
Krutikov
,
A. A.
,
Nadinskii
,
Y. N.
,
Nikolaeva
,
A. V.
,
Skibin
,
A. P.
, and
Sotskov
,
V. V.
,
2014
, “
Calculation Study of Mass Exchange in the Flow Part of the Experimental Model of the Steam Distribution Section of PGV-1500 Steam Generator With Two Steam Nozzles
,”
Therm. Eng.
,
61
(
10
), pp.
710
–7
23
(in Russian).10.1134/S0040601514100048
21.
Nuclear Energy Agency Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations
,
2007
, “
Best Practice Guidelines for the Use of CFD in Nuclear Reactor Safety Applications
,” Nuclear Energy Agency of the OECD (NEA), Paris, France, Report No. NEA/CSNI/R (2007)5.
22.
Nuclear Energy Agency Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations
,
2015
, “
Best Practice Guidelines for the Use of CFD in Nuclear Reactor Safety Applications
,” Nuclear Energy Agency of the OECD (NEA), Paris, France, Report No. NEA/CSNI/R (2014)11.
23.
Bezrukov
,
Y. A.
,
Kabanova
,
L. S.
,
Sotskov
,
V. V.
,
Trunov
,
N. B.
,
Boronin
,
A. A.
,
Efanov
,
A. D.
,
Kolesnik
,
V. P.
, and
Levchenko
,
Y. D.
,
2005
, “
Optimization of the Perforation of the Steam Distribution Perforated Sheet PGV-1500
,”
Proceedings of the Fourth International Scientific and Technical Conference Safety Assurance of NPP With VVER
, Podolsk, Russia, May 23–25, p.
10
(in Russian).
24.
Bezrukov
,
Y. A.
,
Kabanova
,
L. S.
,
Sotskov
,
V. V.
,
Trunov
,
N. B.
,
Boronin
,
A. A.
,
Efanov
,
A. D.
,
Kolesnik
,
V. P.
, and
Levchenko
,
Y. D.
,
2006
, “
Optimization of the Perforation of the Steam Distribution Perforated Sheet PGV-1500
,”
Proceedings of the Seventh International Seminar on Horizontal Steam Generators
, Podolsk, Russia, May 23–25 (in Russian).
You do not currently have access to this content.