Steel pipelines, buried in cold regions, often respond to thermal strains and/or geotechnical movement caused by factors such as thaw settlement, frost heave, and slope instability. These complex field conditions can impose large displacements on these pipelines, resulting in localized wrinkles well into the plastic range of the pipe material. Eventually, there is a possibility of a fracture occurring at a wrinkled location under continuous deformation. A recent field fracture and a failed laboratory specimen have been observed within a telescopic wrinkle under tearing action and the loading histories have been found to be monotonic, without significant strain reversals. These incidents underscore the need for a detailed investigation, which seeks to answer fundamental questions regarding this unique mode of failure. In this study, a finite element model has been developed, which is capable of accounting for material nonlinearity effects, large displacements, large rotations, initial imperfections, and possible complex contact surfaces. Based on limited test data, the comparison of the numerical and the experimental results demonstrates the ability of the present model to predict the local buckling behavior of pipes when deformed well into the postwrinkling range. The results of this analytical work include the global and local deformation patterns and a detailed assessment of the stress-strain relations at the region of the telescopic wrinkle. The results obtained from this study have recognized the occurrence of strain reversal at the sharp fold of the wrinkle on the compression side of the pipe, a phenomenon that could be considered to be the key factor for triggering this unique failure mechanism.

1.
Yukon Government
, 2006, “
Pipeline and Transportation Infrastructure
,” Oil and Gas Information.
2.
Das
,
S.
,
Cheng
,
J. J. R.
, and
Murray
,
D. W.
, 2002, “
Fracture in Wrinkled Linepipe Under Monotonic Loading
,”
Proceedings of the Fourth International Pipeline Conference
, Calgary, AB, Canada, Sept. 30–Oct. 3,
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
,
New York
, pp.
1613
1618
.
3.
Hibbitt
,
H. D.
,
Karlsson
,
B. I.
, and
Sorensen
,
P.
, 2006, ABAQUS version 6.6 Theory Manual.
4.
Murray
,
D. W.
, 1997, “
Local Buckling, Strain Localization, Wrinkling and Postbuckling Response of Line Pipe
,”
Eng. Struct.
0141-0296,
19
(
5
), pp.
360
371
.
5.
Mohareb
,
M.
,
Kulak
,
G. L.
, and
Elwi
,
A.
, 2001, “
Testing and Analysis of Steel Pipe Segments
,”
J. Transp. Eng.
0733-947X,
127
(
5
), pp.
408
417
.
6.
Das
,
S.
,
Cheng
,
J. J. R.
, and
Murray
,
D. W.
, 2007, “
Prediction of Fracture in Wrinkled Energy Pipelines Subjected to Cyclic Deformations
,”
Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng.
1053-5381,
17
(
3
), pp.
205
212
.
7.
Bruschi
,
R.
,
Monti
,
P.
, and
Bolzoni
,
G.
, and
Tagliaferri
,
R.
, 1995, “
Finite Element Method as Numerical Laboratory for Analysing Pipeline Response Under Internal Pressure, Axial Load, Bending Moment
,”
Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
, Copenhagen, Den, June 18–22, 1995,
ASME
, NY, USA, Vol.
5
, pp.
389
401
.
8.
Das
,
S.
, 2003, “
Fracture of Wrinkled Energy Pipelines
,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
9.
Dinovitzer
,
A. S.
, and
Smith
,
J. R.
, 1998, “
Strain-Based Pipeline Design Criteria Review
,”
Proceedings of the 1998 International Pipeline Conference (IPC)
, Calgary, AB, Canada, Jun. 7–11,
ASME
,
Fairfield, NJ
, Part 2, Vol.
2
, pp.
763
770
.
10.
Dorey
,
A. B.
,
Murray
,
D. W.
, and
Cheng
,
J. J. R.
, 2006, “
Initial Imperfection Models for Segments of Line Pipe
,”
ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng.
0892-7219,
128
(
4
), pp.
322
329
.
11.
Bushnell
,
D.
, 1981, “
Buckling of Shells-Pitfall for Designers
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
19
(
9
), pp.
1183
1226
.
12.
Zhou
,
Z. J.
, and
Murray
,
D. W.
, 1995, “
Analysis of Postbuckling Behavior of Line Pipe Subjected to Combined Loads
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
0020-7683,
32
(
20
), pp.
3015
3036
.
13.
Riks
,
E.
, 1979, “
An Incremental Approach to the Solution of Snapping and Buckling Problems
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
0020-7683,
15
(
7
), pp.
529
551
.
14.
Dorey
,
A. B.
,
Murray
,
D. W.
, and
Cheng
,
J. J. R.
, 2002, “
Material Property Effects on Critical Buckling Strains in Energy Pipelines
,”
Proceedings of the Fourth International Pipeline Conference
, Calgary, AB, Canada, Sept. 30–Oct. 3,
ASME
,
Fairfield, NJ
, pp.
475
484
.
15.
Dinovitzer
,
A.
,
Fred
,
A.
, and
Lazor
,
R.
, 2004, “
Development and Validation of a Pipeline Buckle and Wrinkle Assessment Model
,”
Proceedings of the Fifth Biennial International Pipeline Conference
, Calgary, AB, Canada, Oct. 4–8,
ASME
,
New York
, Vol.
2
, pp.
1219
1228
.
16.
Das
,
S.
,
Cheng
,
J. J. R.
, and
Murray
,
D. W.
, 2007, “
Behavior of Wrinkled Steel Pipelines Subjected to Cyclic Axial Loadings
,”
Can. J. Civ. Eng.
0315-1468,
34
(
5
), pp.
598
607
.
You do not currently have access to this content.