Abstract

Wind farms with shared mooring lines have the potential to reduce mooring costs. However, such wind farms may encounter complex system dynamics because adjacent wind turbines are coupled. This paper presents an analysis of the shared mooring system with a focus on the system natural periods. We first apply Irvine’s method to model both the shared line and the two-segment single lines. The response surface method is proposed to replace iterations of the catenary equations of the single lines, and a realistic single line design is presented for OC3 Hywind. Then, system linearization and eigenvalue analysis are performed for the wind farm consisting of two spar floating wind turbines, one shared line, and four single lines. The obtained natural periods and natural modes are verified by numerical free decay tests. Finally, a sensitivity study is carried out to investigate the influence of mooring properties. It is found that the shared line has a significant influence on the natural periods in the surge and sway modes. The natural periods in the surge and sway modes are also most sensitive to the mooring property variations. Two sway eigenmodes are identified, and the lower sway natural period varies between 23 s and 88 s in the sensitivity study. The present analysis method can be used to identify critical natural periods at the preliminary design stage of shared mooring systems.

References

1.
Gao
,
Z.
, and
Moan
,
T.
,
2009
, “
Mooring System Analysis of Multiple Wave Energy Converters in a Farm Configuration
,”
Proceedings of the 8th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference
,
Uppsala, Sweden
, pp.
509
518
.
2.
Goldschmidt
,
M.
, and
Muskulus
,
M.
,
2015
, “
Coupled Mooring Systems for Floating Wind Farms
,”
Energy Procedia
,
80
, pp.
255
262
.
3.
Hall
,
M.
, and
Connolly
,
P.
,
2018
, “
Coupled Dynamics Modelling of a Floating Wind Farm With Shared Mooring Lines
,”
ASME 2018 37th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
,
Madrid, Spain
,
American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection
.
4.
Connolly
,
P.
, and
Hall
,
M.
,
2019
, “
Comparison of Pilot-Scale Floating Offshore Wind Farms With Shared Moorings
,”
Ocean. Eng.
,
171
, pp.
172
180
.
5.
Hall
,
M.
,
2020
, “
Moordyn v2: New Capabilities in Mooring System Components and Load Cases
,” Technical Report, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States).
6.
Jonkman
,
J.
,
2010
, “
Definition of the Floating System for Phase IV of OC3
,” Technical Report NREL/TP-500-47535, National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO.
7.
Irvine
,
H
,
1992
,
Cable Structures
,
Dover Publications
,
New York
.
8.
Faltinsen
,
O
,
1993
,
Sea Loads on Ships and Offshore Structures
, Vol.
1
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
.
9.
Liang
,
G.
,
Merz
,
K.
, and
Jiang
,
Z.
,
2020
, “
Modeling of a Shared Mooring System for a Dual-Spar Configuration
,”
International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
, Vol.
9
,
Ocean Renewable Energy, American Society of Mechanical Engineers
.
10.
Arora
,
J. S.
,
2004
,
Introduction to Optimum Design
,
Elsevier
.
11.
DNV GL
,
2019
, SESAM User Manual, WADAM, Wave Analysis by Diffraction and Morison theory. Høvik, Norway.
12.
Merz
,
K.
,
2020
, “
Development of an LQR Framework for Rapid Prototyping of Offshore Wind Turbine Controllers, With Application to Active Load Control
,” Technical Report 2020:00257, SINTEF Energy Research.
13.
Skaare
,
B.
,
Nielsen
,
F. G.
,
Hanson
,
T. D.
,
Yttervik
,
R.
,
Havmøller
,
O.
, and
Rekdal
,
A.
,
2015
, “
Analysis of Measurements and Simulations From the Hywind Demo Floating Wind Turbine
,”
Wind Energy
,
18
(
6
), pp.
1105
1122
.
14.
Li
,
L.
,
Gao
,
Z.
, and
Moan
,
T.
,
2015
, “
Joint Distribution of Environmental Condition At Five European Offshore Sites for Design of Combined Wind and Wave Energy Devices
,”
ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng.
,
137
(
3
), p.
031901
.
15.
Jonkman
,
B. J.
, and
Buhl Jr
,
M. L.
,
2006
, “
Turbsim User’s Guide
,” Technical Report, National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL), Golden, CO.
16.
IEC
,
2005
, International Standard IEC 61400-1, Wind turbines–Part 1: Design Requirements. Geneva, Switzerland.
17.
IEC
,
2009
, International Standard IEC 61400-3, Wind turbines–Part 3: Design Requirements for Offshore Wind Turbines. Geneva, Switzerland.
18.
DNV GL
,
2018
, Standard DNVGL-ST-0119, Floating Wind Turbine Structures. Høvik, Norway.
19.
DNV GL
,
2015
, Offshore standard DNVGL-OS-E301, Position mooring. Høvik, Norway.
20.
DNV GL
,
2015
, Offshore standard DNVGL-OS-E302, Offshore mooring chain. Høvik, Norway.
21.
DNV GL
,
2015
, Offshore standard DNVGL-OS-E304, Offshore mooring steel wire ropes. Høvik, Norway.
22.
DNV GL
,
2003
, MIMOSA-User’s Doumentation Programme Version 5.7. Høvik, Norway.
23.
SINTEF Ocean
,
2019
, SIMO 4.16.0 User Guide. Trondheim, Norway.
24.
SINTEF Ocean
,
2019
, RIFLEX 4.16.0 User Guide. Trondheim, Norway.
25.
Liu
,
Y.
, and
Bergdahl
,
L.
,
1998
, “
Extreme Mooring Cable Tensions Due to Wave-Frequency Excitations
,”
Appl. Ocean. Res.
,
20
(
4
), pp.
237
249
.
26.
Jiang
,
Z.
,
Hu
,
W.
,
Dong
,
W.
,
Gao
,
Z.
, and
Ren
,
Z.
,
2017
, “
Structural Reliability Analysis of Wind Turbines: A Review
,”
Energies
,
10
(
12
), p.
2099
.
27.
Jonkman
,
J.
,
Butterfield
,
S.
,
Musial
,
W.
, and
Scott
,
G.
,
2009
, “
Definition of a 5-MW Reference Wind Turbine for Offshore System Development
,” Technical Report, NREL/TP-500-38060, National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO.
28.
McKay
,
M. D.
,
Beckman
,
R. J.
, and
Conover
,
W. J.
,
1979
, “
A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code
,”
Technometrics
,
21
(
2
), pp.
239
245
.
You do not currently have access to this content.