The 40% of wall criterion, which is generally used for the plugging of steam generator tubes, is applied only to a single crack. In the previous study (Moon et al. (2002)), a total number of 9 failure models were introduced to estimate the local failure of the ligament between cracks and the optimum coalescence model of multiple collinear cracks was determined among these models. It is, however, known that parallel axial cracks are more frequently detected during an in-service inspection than collinear axial cracks. The objective of this study is to determine the plastic collapse model which can be applied to the steam generator tube containing two parallel axial through-wall cracks. Three previously proposed local failure models were selected as the candidates. Subsequently interaction effects between two adjacent cracks were evaluated to screen them. Plastic collapse tests for the plate with two parallel through-wall cracks and finite element analyses were performed for the determination of the optimum plastic collapse model. By comparing the test results with the prediction results obtained from the candidate models, a crack opening displacement (COD) base model was selected as an optimum model.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Keywords:
finite element analysis, failure (mechanical), cracks, fission reactor materials, fission reactor theory, plastic deformation, nuclear reactor maintenance, Steam Generator Tube, Plastic Collapse Load, Interaction Effect, Failure Prediction Model
Topics:
Failure, Fracture (Materials), Stress, Collapse, Boilers, Plates (structures)
1.
USNRC, 1996, “Steam Generator Tube Failures,” NUREG/CR-6365, April.
2.
USNRC, 1976, “Bases for Plugging Degraded PWR Steam Generator Tubes,” Regulatory guide 1.121, August.
3.
ASME, 1998, “Rules for Construction of Nuclear Power Plant Components,” ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, New York.
4.
Cochet, B., and Flesch, B., 1987, “Crack Stability Criteria in Steam Generator Tubes,” 9th Int. Conference on SMiRT, Vol. D, pp. 413–419.
5.
Yu, Y. J., Kim, J. H., Kim, Y., and Kim, Y. J., 1994, Development of Steam Generator Tube Plugging Criteria for Axial Crack, ASME PVP, Vol. 280, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp. 79–83.
6.
Kim, H. D., Chung, H. S., and Hong, S. R., 1999, “Discussion on Operation Leakage Criteria of Ulchin Unit 1&2 Steam Generators,” Proceedings of the Korean Nuclear Society Autumn Meeting.
7.
Kim, H. D., Kim, K. T., and Chung, H. S., 1999, “Structural Integrity Assessment on Axial PWSCC of Steam Generator Tubes,” Proceedings of the Korean Nuclear Society Autumn Meeting.
8.
Gorman, J. A., Harris, J. E., and Lowenstein, D. B., 1995, “Steam Generator Tube Fitness-for-Service Guidelines,” AECB Report No. 2.228.2, pp. 220.
9.
Lee, J. H., Park, Y. W., Song, M. H., Kim, Y. J., and Moon, S. I., 2000, “Determination of Equivalent Single Crack Based on Coalescence Criterion of Collinear Axial Cracks,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 205, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp. 1–11.
10.
Kim, J. S. et al., 1999, “Investigation Report for Steam Generator Tubes Pulled out From Ulchin #1,” Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, October.
11.
Murakami, Y., 1987, Stress Intensity Factors Handbook, Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 204–205.
12.
Cho, Y. J., 1990, “A Study on the Interaction Effect of Adjacent Semi-Elliptical Crack,” Master’s Thesis, Sungkyunkwan university, Suwon, Korea.
13.
Moon, S. I., Kim, Y. J., Kim, Y. J., Park, Y. W., Song, M. H., and Lee, J. H., 2002, “Optimum Local Failure Model of Cracked Steam Generator Tubes With Multiple Axial Through-Wall Cracks,” SMiRT 17, Paper #G07-3.
14.
Park, Y. W., Song, M. H., Lee, J. H., Moon, S. I., and Kim, Y. J., 2002, “Investigation on the Interaction Effect of Two Parallel Axial Through-Wall Cracks Existing in Steam Generator Tube,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 214, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp. 13–23.
15.
ASME, 1998, “Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components,” ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, New York.
16.
BSI, 1991, “Guidance on Methods for Assessing the Acceptability of Flaw Infusion Welded Joints,” Section 8, London.
17.
Kim, Y. J., Choy, Y. S., and Lee, J. H., 1993, “Development of Fatigue Life Prediction Program for Multiple Surface Cracks,” ASTM STP 1189, pp. 536–550.
18.
Shibata
,
K.
,
Yokoyama
,
N.
,
Ohba
,
T.
,
Kawamura
,
T.
, and
Miyazono
,
S.
,
1985
, “
Growth Evaluation of Fatigue Cracks From Multiple Surface Flaws (I)
,”
J. Japanese Nuclear Society
,
28
, No.
3
, pp.
250
–
262
.
19.
Shibata
,
K.
,
Yokoyama
,
N.
,
Ohba
,
T.
,
Kawamura
,
T.
, and
Miyazono
,
S.
,
1986
, “
Growth Evaluation of Fatigue Cracks From Multiple Surface Flaws (II)
,”
J. Japanese Nuclear Society
,
28
, No.
3
, pp.
258
–
265
.
20.
Park, Y. W., Song, M. H., and Lee, J. H., 2000, “Steam Generator Tube Integrity Program,” KINS/RR-001, Korean Institute of Nuclear Safety.
21.
Lee
,
J. H.
,
Park
,
Y. W.
,
Song
,
M. H.
,
Kim
,
Y. J.
, and
Moon
,
S. I.
,
2000
, “
Evaluation of Plugging Criteria an Steam Generator Tubes and Coalescence Model of Collinear Axial Through-Wall Cracks
,”
J. Korean Nuclear Society
,
32
, pp.
465
–
476
.
22.
Diercks, D. R., 2000, “Steam Generator Tube Integrity Program Monthly Report,” Argonne National Laboratory, Illinois, August.
23.
Diercks, D. R., 2000, “Steam Generator Tube Integrity Program Monthly Report,” Argonne National Laboratory, Illinois, September.
24.
EPRI, 1991, “Steam Generator Tube Integrity, Volume 1: Burst Test Results and Validation of Rupture Criteria (Framatome Data),” NP-6865-L, Paris, June.
25.
Miller, A. G., 1988, “Review of Limit Loads of Structures Containing Defects,” Int. J. Pres. & Piping, Vol. 32, pp. 197–327, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
Copyright © 2005
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.