In support of the ASME Div 2 Rewrite, a master S-N curve approach has been developed using a mesh-insensitive structural stress procedure for fatigue evaluation of welded components. The effectiveness of the master S-N curve approach has been demonstrated in a number of earlier publications for many joint types and loading conditions for pipe and vessel components as well as plate joints. To further validate the structural stress method, a series of recent test data (small weld details and a full-scale vessel) published by De Jesus et al. (2004, Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, 27, pp. 799–810) were analyzed in this paper. A comparative assessment of various existing procedures and their effectiveness in correlating the fatigue test data by De Jesus is also presented. These assessment procedures include current ASME Sec. VIII Div 2, weld classification approach in PD 5500, and the surface extrapolation-based hot spot stress approach in recently approved European EN 13445 Standards.

1.
Dong
,
P.
,
Hong
,
J. K.
,
Osage
,
D.
, and
Prager
,
M.
, 2002, “
Master S-N Curve Approach for Fatigue Evaluation of Welded Components
,” WRC Bulletin, No. 474, Welding Research Council, New York.
2.
Dong
,
P.
, and
Hong
,
J. K.
, 2004, “
The Master S-N Curve Approach to Fatigue of Piping and Vessel Welds
,”
Weld. World
0043-2288,
48
(
1/2
), pp.
28
36
.
3.
Dong
,
P.
, and
Hong
,
J. K.
, 2004, “
The Master S-N Curve Approach to Fatigue Evaluation of Offshore and Marine Structures
,”
Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
, Paper No. OMAE2004-51324, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
4.
Healy
,
B.
, 2004, “
A Case Study Comparison of Surface Extrapolation and Battelle Structural Stress Methodologies
,”
Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
, Paper No. OMAE2004-51228,
Vancouver
,
British Columbia, Canada
.
5.
Kyuba
,
H.
, and
Dong
,
P.
, 2005, “
Equilibrium-Equivalent Structural Stress Approach to Fatigue Analysis of a Rectangular Hollow Section Joint
,”
Int. J. Fatigue
0142-1123,
27
, pp.
85
94
.
6.
Markl
,
A. R. C.
, 1947, “
Fatigue Tests of Welding Elbows and Comparable Double-Mitre Bends
,”
Trans. ASME
0097-6822,
69
, pp.
866
879
.
7.
Markl
,
A. R. C.
, 1952, “
Fatigue Tests of Piping Components
,”
Trans. ASME
0097-6822,
74
, pp.
287
303
.
8.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
, 1997, ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel code, Section 3, Rules for Construction of Nuclear Power Plant Components, NB, Class 1 Components and Section VIII, Rules for Construction of Pressure Vessels, Division 2-Alternate Rules.
9.
De Jesus
,
A. M. P.
,
Ribeiro
,
A. S.
, and
Fernandes
,
A. A.
, 2004, “
Validation of Procedures for Fatigue Life Assessment of a Steel Pressure Vessel
,”
Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct.
8756-758X,
27
, pp.
799
810
.
10.
British Standards Institution
—BSI, 2003, PD 5500:2003,
Specifications for Unfired Fusion Welded Pressure Vessels
, British Standard, London, UK.
11.
European Committee for Standardization
, CEN, 2002, EN 13445:2003,
Unfired Pressure Vessels
, European Standard.
12.
Niemi
,
E.
, 1992, “
Recommendations Concerning Stress Determination for Fatigue Analysis of Welded Components
,” IIW Document No. XIII-1458-92/XV-797–92.
You do not currently have access to this content.