In the 1960s and 1970s, when the surveillance programs for currently operating commercial nuclear reactors were established, state of knowledge limitations resulted in the use of Charpy-V notch (CVN) specimens rather than fracture toughness specimens. Reasonable success has since been achieved in correlating CVN and fracture toughness parameters. Such correlations provide an important part of the technical basis for both current regulations and ASME codes. These correlations imply that trends manifest in CVN data must also appear in fracture toughness data, even though empirical evidence demonstrate that this is not always true. For example, the temperature dependence of CVN energy (CVE) in transition is thought to be a unique feature of each specific sample of ferritic steel that is tested, a view in sharp contrast with the now widely accepted view of a “master curve” for transition fracture toughness (KJc). Also, effects of product form on CVE temperature dependence and property correlations are widely reported, despite the fact that product form effects are absent from KJc properties. These observations suggest that the mapping of CVE behavior onto fracture toughness implicit to correlation-based regulations and ASME codes may produce erroneous trends in estimated values of fracture toughness. In this paper we investigate the hypothesis that the apparent differences between CVE and fracture toughness arise due to differences in how the temperature dependence of CVE and KJc data have historically been modeled. Our analysis shows that when CVE data are analyzed in a manner consistent with KJc data (i.e., transition and upper shelf data are partitioned from each other and analyzed separately rather than being fit with a continuous tanh function), the apparent differences between CVE and toughness characterizations are minimized significantly, and may disappear entirely. These findings demonstrate the differences between CVE and fracture toughness data to be an artifact of the tanh analysis method rather than an intrinsic property of CVE.

1.
Sokolov
,
M. A.
, and
Nanstad
,
R. K.
, 1996, “
Comparison of Irradiation Induced Shifts of KJc and Charpy Impact Toughness for Reactor Pressure Vessel Steels
,”
American Society of Testing and Materials
, Paper No. ASTM STP-1325.
2.
Kirk
,
M.
, and
Natishan
,
M. E.
, 2001, “
Shift in Toughness Transition Temperature Due to Irradiation: ΔTo Vs. ΔT41 J, a Comparison and Rationalization of Differences
,”
Proceedings of the IAEA Specialists Meeting on Master Curve Technology
, Prague, Czech Republic, Sept.
3.
2000, “
Fracture Toughness Requirements {for Normal Operations}
,” Code of Federal Regulation 10 CFR 10 Appendix G, promulgated Jun. 26, 1984, published by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC.
4.
1988, “
Radiation Embrittlement of Reactor Vessel Materials
,” Regulatory Guide 1.99 (Revision 2), United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, May.
5.
Chaouadi
,
R.
, and
Gérard
,
R.
, 2005, “
Copper Precipitate Hardening of Irradiated RPV Materials and Implications on The Superposition Law and Re-Irradiation Kinetics
,”
J. Nucl. Mater.
0022-3115,
345
, pp.
65
74
.
6.
Wallin
,
K.
, 1993, “
Irradiation Damage Effects on the Fracture Toughness Transition Curve Shape for Reactor Vessel Steels
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
0308-0161,
55
, pp.
61
79
.
7.
Kirk
,
M.
,
Lott
,
R.
,
Kim
,
C.
, and
Server
,
W.
, 1998, “
Empirical Validation of the Master Curve for Irradiated and Unirradiated Reactor Pressure Vessel Steels
,”
Proceedings of the 1998 ASME/JSME Pressure Vessel and Piping Symposium
, San Diego, CA, Jul. 26–30.
8.
Sokolov
,
M. A.
, 1998, “
Statistical Analysis of the ASME KIc Database
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930,
120
, pp.
24
28
.
9.
Sokolov
,
M. A.
,
Wallin
,
K.
, and
McCabe
,
D. E.
, 1997, “
Application of Small Specimens to Fracture Mechanics Characterization of Irradiated Pressure Vessel Steels
,”
Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics
, Vol.
28
,
J. H.
Underwood
,
B. D.
MacDonald
, and
M. R.
Mitchell
, eds.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia, PA
.
10.
Yoon
,
K. K.
,
Hall
,
J. B.
,
VanDerSluys
,
W. A.
,
Higuchi
,
M.
, and
Iida
,
K.
, 2001, “
Japanese Fracture Toughness Data Analysis Using Master Curve Method
,”
Proceedings of the 2001 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference
, Atlanta, GA, Jul. 23–26.
11.
Natishan
,
M. E.
, 2001, “
Establishing a Physically Based, Predictive Model for Fracture Toughness Transition Behavior of Ferritic Steels (MRP-53)
,” Materials Reliability Program (MRP), EPRI, Palo Alto, CA, Report No. 1003077.
12.
Wagenhofer
,
M.
, 2002, “
Modeling the Transition Region Fracture Behavior of Ferritic Steels
,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
13.
McGowan
,
J. J.
,
Nanstad
,
R. K.
, and
Thomas
,
K. R.
, 1988, “
Characterization of Irradiated Current Practice Welds and A533 Grade B Class 1 Plate for Nuclear Pressure Vessel Service
,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Report No. NUREG/CR-4880.
14.
Nanstad
,
R. K.
,
Haggag
,
F. M.
, and
McCabe
,
D. E.
, 1992, “
Irradiation Effects on Fracture Toughness of Two High-Copper Submerged-Arc Welds
,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Report No. NUREG/CR-5913.
15.
McCabe
,
D. E.
, 2000, “
Evaluation of WF-70 Weld Metal From the Midland-1 Reactor Vessel
,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Report No. NUREG/CR-5736.
16.
Sokolov
,
M. A.
,
Nanstad
,
R. K.
,
Remec
,
I.
,
Baldwin
,
C. A.
, and
Swain
,
R. L.
, 2003, “
Fracture Toughness of an Irradiated, Highly Embrittled Reactor Pressure Vessel Weld
,” Report No. ORNL/TM-2002/293.
17.
Domain
,
H. A.
, 1987, “
Low Upper-Shelf Toughness, High Transition Temperature Test Insert in HSST PTSE-2 Vessel and Wide Plate Test Specimens—Final Report
,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Report No. NUREG/CR-4711.
18.
Novovic
,
M.
, 2001, “
Effects of Microstructure and Prestraining on Ductile to Brittle Transition in Carbon-Manganese Weld Metals
,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
19.
Onizawa
,
K.
, and
Suzuki
,
M.
, 2002, “
Comparison of Transition Temperature Shifts Between Static Fracture Toughness and Charpy-V Impact Properties Due to Irradiation and Post-Irradiation Annealing for Japanese A533B-1 Steels
,”
Effects of Radiation on Materials: 20th International Symposium
,
S. T.
Rosinski
,
M. L.
Grossbeck
,
T. R.
Allen
, and
A. S.
Kumar
, eds.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
West Conshohocken, PA
, Paper No. ASTM STP 1405.
20.
Kim
,
S. H.
,
Park
,
Y. W.
,
Kang
,
S. S.
, and
Chung
,
H. D.
, 1999, “
Estimation of Fracture Toughness Transition Curves of RPV Steels from Charpy Impact Test Data
,”
SMiRT 15: 15th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology
, Seoul, Republic of Korea, Aug. 15–20, 2004.
21.
Hoffman
,
C. L.
, “
Materials Reliability Program: Fracture Toughness Evaluation of Unirradiated and Irradiated RPV Weld Metals (MRP-127)
,” EPRI, Palo Alto, CA, Report No. 1011112.
22.
Lucon
,
E.
, private communication.
23.
Selzman
,
W. J.
,
Berggren
,
R. G.
, and
Jones
,
T. N.
Jr.
, 1985, “
ORNL Characterization of Heavy-Section Steel Technology Program Plates 01, 02, and 03
,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Report No. NUREG/CR-4092.
24.
McConnell
,
P.
,
Server
,
W. L.
,
Oldfield
,
W.
, and
Oldfield
,
F. M.
, 1982, “
Irradiated Nuclear Pressure Vessel Steel Database
,” Electric Power Research Institute Report No. EPRI-NP-2428.
25.
Eason
,
E. D.
,
Wright
,
J. E.
, and
Odette
,
G. R.
, 1998, “
Improved Embrittlement Correlations for Reactor Pressure Vessel Steels
,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Report No. NUREG/CR-6551.
26.
Wallin
,
K.
, 1989, “
A Simple Theoretical Charpy-V−KIc Correlation for Irradiation Embrittlement
,”
Proceedings of the 1989 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, PVP
, Honolulu, HI, Jul. 23–37, Vol.
170
, pp.
93
100
.
27.
Valo
,
M.
,
Wallin
,
K.
,
Törrönen
,
K.
, and
Ahlstrand
,
R.
, 1993, “
Comparison of Charpy-V and J-Integral Transition Temperature Shifts in CrMoV Pressure Vessel Steels
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
0308-0161,
55
, pp.
81
88
.
28.
ASTM International
, 2002, “
Test Method for Determination of Reference Temperature, To, for Ferritic Steels in the Transition Range
,” Paper No. ASTM E1921-02.
29.
Wallin
,
K.
, and
Rintamaa
,
R.
, 1998, “
Master Curve Based Correlation Between Static Initiation Toughness KIc and Crack Arrest Toughness KIa
,”
Proceedings of the 24th MPA-Seminar
, Stuttgart, Germany, Oct. 8–9.
30.
Lott
,
R. G.
,
Kirk
,
M. T.
, and
Kim
,
C. C.
, 1998, “
Master Curve Strategies for RPV Assessment
,” Westinghouse Electric Company, Paper No. WCAP-15075.
31.
EricksonKirk
,
M. T.
, 2007, “
The Technical Basis for Application of the Master Curve to the Assessment of Nuclear Reactor Pressure Vessel Integrity
,”
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
, to be published.
You do not currently have access to this content.