The direct-current potential difference method (DC-PDM) is a promising nondestructive technique for evaluating cracks in the conductors on the basis of change in current paths or the potential difference due to cracks. In a previous study, the authors proposed a method for the simultaneous evaluation of the location and size of a semi-elliptical crack on the back surface of a plate and the plate thickness. Its theoretical validity and practical utility were shown by numerical analyses and experiments. This study extends the method to the simultaneous evaluation of a crack on the inner surface of a pipe and the pipe wall thickness. The related electric field analyses are performed using the finite element method. The results show that the location, length, and depth of a semi-elliptical crack on the inner surface of the pipe and the pipe wall thickness can be evaluated based on the distribution of the potential difference measured on the outer surface of the pipe. This extension will prove useful for various practical cases, which are often seen in the piping of power-generating and petrochemical plants.

References

1.
Viswanathan
,
R.
, 2000, “
Life Management of High-Temperature Piping and Tubing in Fossil Power Plants
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
122
(
3
), pp.
305
316
.
2.
Lozev
,
M. G.
,
Smith
,
R. W.
, and
Grimmett
,
B. B.
, 2005, “
Evaluation of Methods for Detecting and Monitoring of Corrosion Damage in Risers
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
127
(
3
), pp.
244
254
.
3.
Beavers
,
C. J.
ed., 1980,
The Measurement of Crack Length and Shape During Fracture and Fatigue
,
Engineering Materials Advisory Services
,
United Kingdom
, pp.
85
284
.
4.
Le Mat Hamata
,
N.
, and
Shibli
,
I. A.
, 2001, “
Creep Crack Growth of Seam-Welded P22 and P91 Pipes With Artificial Defects. Part I. Experimental Study and Post-Test Metallography
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
78
(
11–12
), pp.
819
826
.
5.
Gandossi
,
L.
,
Summers
,
S. A.
,
Taylor
,
N. G.
,
Hurst
,
R. C.
,
Hulm
,
B. J.
, and
Parker
,
J. D.
, 2001, “
The Potential Drop Method for Monitoring Crack Growth in Real Components Subjected to Combined Fatigue and Creep Conditions: Application of FE Techniques for Deriving Calibration Curves
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
78
(
11–12
), pp.
881
891
.
6.
Cerny
,
I.
, 2001, “
Measurement of Subcritical Growth of Defects in Large Components of Nuclear Power Plants at Elevated Temperature
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
78
(
11–12
), pp.
893
902
.
7.
Chen
,
W. H.
,
Chen
,
J. S.
, and
Fang
,
H. L.
, 2002, “
A Theoretical Procedure for Detection of Simulated Cracks in a Pipe by the Direct Current-Potential Drop Technique
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
216
(
1–3
), pp.
203
211
.
8.
Cerny
,
I.
, 2004, “
The Use of DCPD Method for Measurement of Growth of Cracks in Large Components at Normal and Elevated Temperatures
,”
Eng. Fract. Mech.
,
71
(
4–6
), pp.
837
848
.
9.
Ryu
,
K. H.
,
Hwang
,
I. S.
,
Lee
,
N. Y.
,
Oh
,
Y. J.
,
Kim
,
J. H.
,
Park
,
J. H.
, and
Sohn
,
C. H.
, 2008, “
Screening Method for Piping Wall Loss by Flow Accelerated Corrosion
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
238
(
12
), pp.
3263
3268
.
10.
Yoshino
,
S.
,
Hamada
,
S.
, and
Hayakawa
,
M.
, 2008, “
Application of the Electrical Potential Drop Technique to the Pipe Wall Thinning in Thermal Power Plants
,”
Proceedings of the 2008 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference (PVP2008)
, Paper No. PVP2008-61088.
11.
Tada
,
N.
, 2008, “
Application of Direct-Current Potential Difference Method to Evaluation of Various Damages in Conductive Materials
,”
Proceedings of the 2008 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference (PVP2008)
, Paper No. PVP2008-61534.
12.
Tada
,
N.
,
Okada
,
M.
, and
Iwamoto
,
J.
, 2007, “
Three-Dimensional Identification of Semi-Elliptical Surface Crack by Means of Direct-Current Electrical Potential Difference Method With Multiple-Probe Sensor
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
129
(
3
), pp.
441
448
.
13.
Tada
,
N.
,
Iwamoto
,
J.
, and
Okada
,
M.
, 2008, “
Experimental Study of Three-Dimensional Identification of Surface Crack by Means of Direct-Current Electrical Potential Difference Method of Multiple-Point Measurement Type
,”
J. Solid Mech. Mater. Eng., JSME
,
2
(
3
), pp.
300
309
.
14.
Tada
,
N.
, and
Funakoshi
,
A.
, 2009, “
Three-Dimensional Identification of Semi-Elliptical Crack on the Back Surface by Means of Direct-Current Electrical Potential Difference Method With Multiple-Probe Sensor
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
131
(
2
), p.
021501
.
15.
Tada
,
N.
,
Uchida
,
M.
,
Funakoshi
,
A.
, and
Ishikawa
,
H.
, 2007, “
Experimental Study of Three-Dimensional Identification of Semi-Elliptical Crack on the Back Surface by Means of Direct-Current Electrical Potential Difference Method of Multiple-Point Measurement Type
,”
Proceedings of the 2007 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference (PVP2007)
, Paper No. PVP2007-26299.
16.
Tada
,
N.
,
Funakoshi
,
A.
,
Uchida
,
M.
, and
Ishikawa
,
H.
, 2008, “
Electric Field Analysis of the Simultaneous Evaluation of Location, Size, and Shape of a Semi-Elliptical Crack on the Back Surface and Plate Thickness Using Direct-Current Potential Difference Method of Multiple-Probe Type
,”
J. Jpn. Soc. Non-Destr. Insp.
,
57
(
3
), pp.
137
141
(in Japanese).
17.
Boyer
,
H. E.
, and
Gall
,
T. L.
ed., 1985,
Metals Handbook
,
The American Society for Metals
,
OH
, p.
67
.
18.
Hoct Systems Co., Ltd.
, 2004,
Manual of FEMLEEG
,
Kyoto
,
Japan
(in Japanese).
You do not currently have access to this content.