1-20 of 4848
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Articles
Journal Articles
Journal Articles
Image
Example of corridors computed by the solution space method for crashworthin...
Published Online: October 23, 2024
Fig. 1 Example of corridors computed by the solution space method for crashworthiness. d 1 and d 2 are the expected deformation lengths for each component, while F 1 , 2 l and F 1 , 2 u are the lower and upper bounds of the comp... More about this image found in Example of corridors computed by the solution space method for crashworthin...
Image
Image
From the 2013 Honda Accord model [ 2 ] to the solution space corridors [ 23...
Published Online: October 23, 2024
Fig. 3 From the 2013 Honda Accord model [ 2 ] to the solution space corridors [ 23 ], via Deformation Space Model [ 18 ] of the car considering seven components. In the solution space corridors, the white area represents the feasible force ranges, while the gray area represents the infeasible forc... More about this image found in From the 2013 Honda Accord model [ 2 ] to the solution space corridors [ 23...
Image
Image
Image
Convergence of the percentage of misclassified samples: ( a ) the percentag...
Published Online: October 23, 2024
Fig. 6 Convergence of the percentage of misclassified samples: ( a ) the percentage of the 10,000 samples misclassified by the trained classifiers; ( b ) the percentage of the samples classified as feasible that have been misclassified in magenta, and the percentage of the samples classified as in... More about this image found in Convergence of the percentage of misclassified samples: ( a ) the percentag...
Image
Image
Comparison between the feasible areas estimated by the trained classifier a...
Published Online: October 23, 2024
Fig. 8 Comparison between the feasible areas estimated by the trained classifier and defined by the validation set of 10,000 simulations. The gray area is the feasible area according to the validation set, the magenta area is the estimated feasible area. The 12 slices are taken for the following v... More about this image found in Comparison between the feasible areas estimated by the trained classifier a...
Image
Evolution of the estimated feasible area during training. Each row shows th...
Published Online: October 23, 2024
Fig. 9 Evolution of the estimated feasible area during training. Each row shows three slices placed at t 1 = 1.0 mm, t 2 = 1.0 mm, and m  =   30 kg. The first row shows the estimated feasible area after the evaluation of 50 samples (20 points of initial DoE an... More about this image found in Evolution of the estimated feasible area during training. Each row shows th...
Journal Articles
Journal Articles
Journal Articles
Image
Image
Risk assessment framework augmentation proposed in Ref. [ 25 ]. The steps h...
Published Online: October 14, 2024
Fig. 2 Risk assessment framework augmentation proposed in Ref. [ 25 ]. The steps highlighted (1 1 , 1 2 , 1 5 , 2, 3 1 , 4 1 ) are the subject of augmentation (reinforcement actions 1 and 2). Those enable to (1)define the optimal level of analysis and (2) adequately characterize the problem. Preci... More about this image found in Risk assessment framework augmentation proposed in Ref. [ 25 ]. The steps h...
Image
Simplified representation of the Three-Phases method logic [ 25 ]. A techno...
Published Online: October 14, 2024
Fig. 3 Simplified representation of the Three-Phases method logic [ 25 ]. A technological quality assessment enables to define the DMPK of a data source (i.e., how much of the required information can be provided by the data source for a specific parameter). Applying the two degradation factors (D... More about this image found in Simplified representation of the Three-Phases method logic [ 25 ]. A techno...
Image
Examples of analysis level options with respective detailing possibilities ...
Published Online: October 14, 2024
Fig. 4 Examples of analysis level options with respective detailing possibilities for an item of interest selected for a risk analysis. The levels of analysis 1, 2, and 3 represent three ways of isolating that item, for instance, on national, regional, and municipal level, respectively. More about this image found in Examples of analysis level options with respective detailing possibilities ...
Image
Further decomposition possibilities of the item of interest isolated on the...
Published Online: October 14, 2024
Fig. 5 Further decomposition possibilities of the item of interest isolated on the third level of analysis. This fine-graining gives the possibility to isolate up to 69 items in the sixth level, which can then individually be considered for a risk analysis. More about this image found in Further decomposition possibilities of the item of interest isolated on the...