Graphical Abstract Figure
Graphical Abstract Figure
Close modal

Abstract

The substantial energy provided by the sun is a promising substitute for traditional heat sources in various industrial applications. However, the transient nature of solar energy still poses a significant challenge to its widespread utilization. This work presents a methodology for regulating the temperature within a solar receiver by dynamically adjusting incoming sunlight through the aperture using a controlled iris mechanism. The performance of this technique is experimentally compared with the gas flowrate control method, which is typically used in industry. The proposed control system, grounded in the physical model of the solar receiver, underwent experimental testing under varying conditions, including different gas flowrates, simulator power levels, and aperture sizes. The collected data were then analyzed to estimate a simplified model of the solar receiver. A model predictive controller (MPC) is implemented using the model estimations, and its performance was assessed by tracking two set points (335 and 325 °C) over a period of 2 h. The experimental testing of both control systems indicates the superiority of iris mechanism over gas flowrate controller in terms of robustness, settling time, and smoothness. A hybrid control system utilizing both aperture size and gas flowrate is also developed and tested during the operation of the solar receiver via computer simulations.

References

1.
Azad Gilani
,
H.
, and
Hoseinzadeh
,
S.
,
2021
, “
Techno-economic Study of Compound Parabolic Collector in Solar Water Heating System in the Northern Hemisphere
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
,
190
, p.
116756
.
2.
Nyarko
,
F. K. A.
,
Takyi
,
G.
, and
Amalu
,
E. H.
,
2020
, “
Robust Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Module (c-Si PVM) for the Tropical Climate: Future Facing the Technology
,”
Sci. African
,
8
, p.
e00359
.
3.
Abedini Najafabadi
,
H. A.
, and
Ozalp
,
N.
,
2017
, “
Development of a Control Model to Regulate Temperature in a Solar Receiver
,”
Renew. Energy
,
111
, pp.
95
104
.
4.
Petrasch
,
J.
,
Osch
,
P.
, and
Steinfeld
,
A.
,
2009
, “
Dynamics and Control of Solar Thermochemical Reactors
,”
Chem. Eng. J.
,
145
(
3
), pp.
362
370
.
5.
Säck
,
J. P.
,
Roeb
,
M.
,
Sattler
,
C.
,
Pitz-Paal
,
R.
, and
Heinzel
,
A.
,
2015
, “
Development of a Simulation-Software for a Hydrogen Production Process on a Solar Tower
,”
Sol. Energy
,
112
, pp.
205
217
.
6.
Al Sahlani
,
A.
,
Randhir
,
K.
,
Hayes
,
M.
,
Schimmels
,
P.
,
Ozalp
,
N.
, and
Klausner
,
J.
,
2023
, “
Design of a Combined PID Controller to Regulate the Temperature Inside a High-Temperature Tubular Solar Reactor
,”
ASME J. Sol Energy Eng.
,
145
(
1
), p.
011011
.
7.
Al Sahlani
,
A.
,
Randhir
,
K.
,
Hayes
,
M.
,
Schimmels
,
P.
,
Ozalp
,
N.
, and
Klausner
,
J.
,
2023
, “
Implementation of a Model Predictive Control Strategy to Regulate Temperature Inside Plug-Flow Solar Reactor With Counter-Current Flow
,”
ASME J. Therm. Sci. Eng. Appl.
,
15
(
2
), p.
021013
.
8.
Alsahlani
,
A.
, and
Ozalp
,
N.
,
2023
, “
Experimental Performance of a Nonlinear Control Strategy to Regulate Temperature of a High-Temperature Solar Reactor
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
145
(
5
), p.
051011
.
9.
Langenbergh
,
L. V. d.
,
Ophoff
,
C.
, and
Ozalp
,
N.
,
2015
, “
An Iris Mechanism Driven Temperature Control of Solar Thermal Reactors
,”
First Thermal and Fluids Engineering Summer Conference
,
New York, NY
,
Aug. 9–12
, pp.
717
731
.
10.
Rajan
,
A.
,
Abouseada
,
M.
,
Manghaipathy
,
P.
,
Ozalp
,
N.
,
Abdul Majid
,
F.
,
Salem
,
A.
, and
Srinivasa
,
A.
,
2016
, “
An Experimental and Analytical Study on the Feasibility of SMA Spring Driven Actuation of an Iris Mechanism
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
,
105
, pp.
849
861
.
11.
Ophoff
,
C.
, and
Ozalp
,
N.
,
2017
, “
A Novel Iris Mechanism for Solar Thermal Receivers
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
139
(
6
), p.
061004
.
12.
Abuseada
,
M.
, and
Ozalp
,
N.
,
2020
, “
Experimental and Numerical Study on a Novel Energy Efficient Variable Aperture Mechanism for a Solar Receiver
,”
Sol. Energy
,
197
, pp.
396
410
.
13.
Abedini Najafabadi
,
H.
, and
Ozalp
,
N.
,
2018
, “
An Advanced Modeling and Experimental Study to Improve Temperature Uniformity of a Solar Receiver
,”
Energy
,
165
(
Part B
), pp.
984
998
.
14.
Abedini Najafabadi
,
H.
,
Ozalp
,
N.
,
Ophoff
,
C.
, and
Moens
,
D.
,
2019
, “
An Experimental Study on Temperature Control of a Solar Receiver Under Transient Solar Load
,”
Sol. Energy
,
186
, pp.
52
59
.
15.
Rowe
,
S. C.
,
Hischier
,
I.
,
Palumbo
,
A. W.
,
Chubukov
,
B. A.
,
Wallace
,
M. A.
,
Viger
,
R.
,
Lewandowski
,
A.
,
Clough
,
D. E.
, and
Weimer
,
A. W.
,
2018
, “
Nowcasting, Predictive Control, and Feedback Control for Temperature Regulation in a Novel Hybrid Solar-Electric Reactor for Continuous Solar-Thermal Chemical Processing
,”
Sol. Energy
,
174
, pp.
474
488
.
16.
Al Sahlani
,
A.
, and
Ozalp
,
N.
,
2023
, “
An Overview of Process Temperature Control in Solar Thermochemical Energy Storage Systems
,”
Annu. Rev. Heat Transfer
,
25
(
1
), pp.
397
411
.
17.
Saade
,
E.
,
Clough
,
D. E.
, and
Weimer
,
A. W.
,
2014
, “
Model Predictive Control of a Solar-Thermal Reactor
,”
Sol. Energy
,
102
, pp.
31
44
.
18.
Abedini Najafabadi
,
H.
, and
Ozalp
,
N.
,
2018
, “
Aperture Size Adjustment Using Model Based Adaptive Control Strategy to Regulate Temperature in a Solar Receiver
,”
Sol. Energy
,
159
, pp.
20
36
.
19.
Smith
,
C. A.
,
1997
,
Principles and Practices of Automatic Process Control (2nd ed.)
,
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
,
New York
.
20.
Abuseada
,
M.
, and
Ozalp
,
N.
,
2020
, “
Experimental and Numerical Study on Heat Transfer Driven Dynamics and Control of Transient Variations in a Solar Receiver
,”
Sol. Energy
,
211
, pp.
700
711
.
You do not currently have access to this content.