Ball and roller bearings are designed to meet endurance requirements basically determined according to the Standard fatigue life calculation method. This method is based on the Lundberg-Palmgren fatigue life theory as modified by reliability, material, and lubrication factors. As application load and spied requirements have increased, the Lundberg-Palmgren method has resulted in bearings of increased size, adding unnecessarily to the size and weight of mechanisms. This is a critical design situation for weight and size-sensitive components such as aircraft gas turbine engines and helicopter power transmissions. The bearing life prediction method developed by Ioannides and Harris recognizes the existence of a fatigue limit stress. If the stresses an operating bearing experiences do not exceed the limit stress, the bearing can achieve infinite life. In any case, the method tends to predict longer lives than the Lundberg-Palmgren method. This paper evaluates the life prediction accuracies of the Lundberg-Palmgren and Ioannides-Harris methods by comparing lives calculated according to these methods and to those actually experienced in 62 different applications. As a result of the investigation, the Ioannides-Harris method is shown to more accurately predict bearing fatigue endurance.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Topics:
Fatigue life, Rolling bearings, Bearings, Stress, Weight (Mass), Aircraft, Computational methods, Design, Fatigue, Fatigue limit, Gas turbines, Lubrication, Reliability, Roller bearings
1.
American National Standards Institute, 1990, ANSI/AFBMA Standard 9-1990, “Load Ratings and Fatigue Life for Ball Bearings.”
2.
American National Standards Institute, 1990, ANSI/AFBMA Standard 11–1990, “Load Ratings and Fatigue Life for Roller Bearings.”
3.
Broszeit
E.
, and
Zwirlein
O.
,
1986
, “
Internal Stresses and Their Influence on Material Stresses in Hertzian Contacts - Calculations with Different Stress Hypotheses
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY
, Vol.
108
, pp.
387
–
393
.
4.
Bryant
M.
, and
Keer
L.
,
1982
, “
Rough Contact between Elastically and Geometrically Identical Curved Bodies
,”
ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics
, Vol.
49
, pp.
345
–
352
.
5.
Crecelius, W., 1978, “User’s Manual for SKF Computer Program SHABERTH, Steady State and Transient Thermal Analysis of a Shaft-Bearing System Including Ball, Cylindrical and Tapered Roller Bearings,” SKF Report AL77P015 submitted to U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory.
6.
Harris, T., 1966, Rolling Bearing Analysis, John Wiley, (The 3rd Ed. of Rolling Bearing Analysis was published by Wiley in 1991.)
7.
Harris
T.
,
Ragen
M.
, and
Spitzer
R.
,
1992
, “
The Effect of Hoop and Material Residual Stresses on the Fatigue Life of High Speed Rolling Bearings
,”
STLE Tribology Transactions
, Vol.
35
, No.
4
, pp.
194
–
198
.
8.
Harris, T., 1994, “Establishment of a New Rolling Contact Bearing Life Calculation Method,” Final Report - U.S. Naval Air Warfare Center, Aircraft Division, Trenton, Contract No. N68335-C-0111.
9.
Ioannides
E.
, and
Harris
T.
,
1985
, “
A New Fatigue Life Model for Rolling Bearings
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY
, Vol.
107
, pp.
367
–
378
.
10.
loannides, E., Jacobson, B., and Tripp, J., 1989, “Prediction of Rolling Bearing Life under Practical Operating Conditions,” Tribological Design of Machine Elements, Proceedings of the I5th Leeds-Lyon Symposium on Tribology, Elsevier, pp. 181–187.
11.
Ioannides
E.
,
Harris
T.
, and
Ragen
M.
,
1990
, “
Endurance of Aircraft Gas Turbine Mainshaft Ball Bearings - Analysis Using Improved Fatigue Life Theory 1: Application to a Long Life Bearing
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY
, Vol.
112
, pp.
304
–
308
.
12.
Jones
A.
,
1960
, “
A General Theory for Elastically Constrained Ball and Radial Roller Bearings under Arbitrary Load and Speed Conditions
,”
ASME Journal of Basic Engineering
, Vol.
82
, pp.
309
–
320
.
13.
Ko, C., and loannides, E., 1989, “Debris Denting - the Associated Residual Stresses and Their Effect on the Fatigue Life of Rolling Bearings: An FEM Analysis,” Tribological Design of Machine Elements, Proceedings of the 15th Leeds-Lyon Symposium on Tribology, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 199–207.
14.
Lundberg, G., and Palmgren, A., 1947, “Dynamic Capacity of Rolling Bearings,” Acta Polytechnica, Mechanical Engineering Series 1, Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences, No. 3, 7.
15.
Lundberg, G., and Palmgren, A., 1952, “Dynamic Capacity of Roller Bearings,” Acta Polytechnica, Mechanical Engineering Series 2, Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences, No. 4, 52.
16.
McCool
J.
,
1986
, “
TRIBOS: A Performance Evaluation Tool for Traction Transmitting Partial EHD Contacts
,”
Tribology Transactions
, Vol.
29
, No.
3
, pp.
432
–
440
.
17.
Lieblein, J., and Zelen, M., 1955, “Statistical Investigation of Fatigue Life of Ball Bearings,” National Bureau of Standards Report No. 3996.
18.
Sayles, R., and MacPherson, P., 1982, “Influence of Wear Debris on Rolling Contact Fatigue,” ASTM STP 771, J. Hoo, Ed., pp. 255–274.
19.
Society for Tribologists and Lubrication Engineers (STLE), 1992, Life Factors for Rolling Bearings, E. Zaretsky, ed.
20.
Shigley, J., and Mischke, C., 1989, Mechanical Engineering Design, 5th Ed., McGraw-Hill.
21.
Thomas, H., and Hoersch, V., 1930, “Stresses Due to the Pressure of One Elastic Solid upon Another,” University of Illinois Bulletin 212.
22.
Webster, M., Ioannides, E., and Sayles, R., 1985, “The Effect of Topographical Defects on the Contact Stress and Fatigue Life in Rolling Element Bearings,” Mechanisms and Surface Distress, Proceedings of the 12th Leeds-Lyon Symposium on Tribology, pp. 207–224.
23.
Zaretsky, E., Bamberger, E., Harris, T., Kacmarsky, W., Moyer, C., Parker, R., and Sherlock, J., 1971, Life Adjustment Factors for Ball and Roller Bearings, ASME Engineering Design Guide.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1996
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.