A new transport equation for the intermittency factor was proposed to predict separated and transitional boundary layers under low-pressure turbine airfoil conditions. The intermittent behavior of the transitional flows is taken into account and incorporated into computations by modifying the eddy viscosity, μt, with the intermittency factor, γ. Turbulent quantities are predicted by using Menter’s two-equation turbulence model (SST). The intermittency factor is obtained from a transport equation model, which not only can reproduce the experimentally observed streamwise variation of the intermittency in the transition zone, but also can provide a realistic cross-stream variation of the intermittency profile. In this paper, the intermittency model is used to predict a recent separated and transitional boundary layer experiment under low pressure turbine airfoil conditions. The experiment provides detailed measurements of velocity, turbulent kinetic energy and intermittency profiles for a number of Reynolds numbers and freestream turbulent intensity conditions and is suitable for validation purposes. Detailed comparisons of computational results with experimental data are presented and good agreements between the experiments and predictions are obtained.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
boundary layers, flow separation, turbines, external flows, viscosity, boundary layer turbulence
Topics:
Boundary layers, Flow (Dynamics), Pressure, Turbulence, Turbines, Airfoils, Computation, Reynolds number
1.
Mayle
,
R. E.
,
1991
, “
The Role of Laminar-Turbulent Transition in Gas Turbine Engines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
113
, pp.
509
–
537
.
2.
Rivir, R. B., 1996, “Transition on Turbine Blades and Cascades at Low Reynolds Numbers,” AIAA Pap., AIAA-96-2079.
3.
Lake, J. P., King, P. I., and Rivir, R. B., 2000, “Low Reynolds Number Loss Reduction on Turbine Blades With Dimples and V-Grooves,” AIAA Pap., AIAA-00-0738.
4.
Wisler, D. C., 1998, “The Technical and Economic Relevance of Understanding Boundary Layer Transition in Gas Turbine Engines,” Minnowbrook II-1997 Workshop on Boundary Layer Transition in Turbomachines, eds., J. E. LaGraff and D. E. Ashpis, NASA CP-1998-206958, pp. 53–64.
5.
Savill, A. M., 1993, “Some Recent Progress in the Turbulence Modeling of By-pass Transition,” Near-Wall Turbulent Flows, eds., R. M. C. So, C. G. Speziale, and B. E. Launder, Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., pp. 829–848.
6.
Savill, A. M., 1993, “Further Progress in The Turbulence Modeling of By-pass Transition,” Engineering Turbulence Modeling and Experiments 2, eds., W. Rodi and F. Martelli, Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., pp. 583–592.
7.
Westin
,
K. J. A.
, and
Henkes
,
R. A. W. M.
,
1997
, “
Application of Turbulence Models to Bypass Transition
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
119
, pp.
859
–
866
.
8.
Dhawan
,
S.
, and
Narasimha
,
R.
,
1958
, “
Some Properties of Boundary Layer During the Transition From Laminar to Turbulent Flow Motion
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
3
, pp.
418
–
436
.
9.
Gostelow
,
J. P.
,
Blunden
,
A. R.
, and
Walker
,
G. J.
,
1994
, “
Effects of Free-Stream Turbulence and Adverse Pressure Gradients on Boundary Layer Transition
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
116
, pp.
392
–
404
.
10.
Solomon, W. J., Walker, G. J., and Gostelow, J. P., 1995, “Transition Length Prediction for Flows With Rapidly Changing Pressure Gradients,” ASME Paper ASME-95-GT-241.
11.
Chen
,
K. K.
, and
Thyson
,
N. A.
,
1971
, “
Extension of Emmons’ Spot Theory to Flows on Blunt Bodies
,”
AIAA J.
,
9
(
5
), pp.
821
–
825
.
12.
Steelant
,
J.
, and
Dick
,
E.
,
1996
, “
Modelling of Bypass Transition With Conditioned Navier-Stokes Equations Coupled to an Intermittency Transport Equation
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids
,
23
, pp.
193
–
220
.
13.
Cho
,
J. R.
, and
Chung
,
M. K.
,
1992
, “
A k−ε−γ Equation Turbulence Model
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
237
, pp.
301
–
322
.
14.
Suzen, Y. B., and Huang, P. G., 1999, “Modelling of Flow Transition Using an Intermittency Transport Equation,” NASA Contractor Report NASA-CR-1999-209313.
15.
Simon, T. W., Qiu, S., and Yuan, K., 2000, “Measurements in a Transitional Boundary Layer Under Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoil Conditions,” NASA Contractor Report NASA-CR-2000-209957.
16.
Suzen
,
Y. B.
, and
Huang
,
P. G.
,
2000
, “
Modelling of Flow Transition Using an Intermittency Transport Equation
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
122
, pp.
273
–
284
.
17.
Suzen
,
Y. B.
,
Xiong
,
G.
, and
Huang
,
P. G.
,
2002
, “
Predictions of Transitional Flows in Low-Pressure Turbines Using an Intermittency Transport Equation
,”
AIAA J.
,
40
(
2
), pp.
254
–
266
.
18.
Hultgren, L. S., and Volino, R. J., 2000, “Separated and Transitional Boundary Layers Under Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoil Conditions,” NASA TM, in preparation.
19.
Volino, R. J., and Hultgren, L. S., 2000, “Measurements in Separated and Transitional Boundary Layers Under Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoil Conditions,” ASME/IGTI Paper 2000-GT-0260.
20.
Simon, F. F., and Stephens, C. A., 1991, “Modeling of the Heat Transfer in Bypass Transitional Boundary-Layer Flows,” NASA Technical Paper 3170.
21.
Huang, P. G., and Coakley, T. J., 1992, “An Implicit Navier-Stokes Code for Turbulent Flow Modeling,” AIAA Pap., AIAA-92-0547.
22.
Menter
,
F. R.
,
1994
, “
Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications
,”
AIAA J.
,
32
(
8
), pp.
1598
–
1605
.
23.
Abu-Ghannam
,
B. J.
, and
Shaw
,
R.
,
1980
, “
Natural Transition of Boundary Layers-The Effects of Turbulence, Pressure Gradient, and Flow History
,”
J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
,
22
(
5
), pp.
213
–
228
.
24.
Roberts
,
W. B.
,
1980
, “
Calculation of Laminar Separation Bubbles and Their Effect on Airfoil Performance
,”
AIAA J.
,
18
(
1
), pp.
25
–
31
.
25.
Davis
,
R. L.
,
Carter
,
J. E.
, and
Reshotko
,
E.
,
1987
, “
Analysis of Transitional Separation Bubbles on Infinite Swept Wings
,”
AIAA J.
,
25
(
3
), pp.
421
–
428
.
26.
Lake, J. P., 1999, “Flow Separation Prevention on a Turbine Blade at Low Reynolds Number,” Ph.D. dissertation, Air Force Institute of Technology, Dayton, OH.
Copyright © 2003
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.