Boundary layer measurements were performed on a cascade of the T106 high lift low-pressure (LP) turbine blades that was subjected to upstream wakes and a moving downstream potential field. Tests were carried out at a low level of inlet freestream turbulence (0.5%) and at a higher (4.0%). It is found that perturbations in the freestream due to both disturbances are superposed on each other. This affects the magnitude of the velocity perturbations at the edge of the boundary layer under the wakes as well as the fluctuations in the edge velocity between the wakes. Furthermore, the fluctuations in the adverse pressure gradient on the suction surface depend on the relative phase of the upstream and downstream disturbances, providing an additional stimulus for clocking studies. Time-mean momentum thickness values calculated from laser Doppler anemometry (LDA) traverses performed near the suction surface trailing edge are used to identify the optimum relative phase angle of the combined interaction. Unsteady suction surface pressures, quasiwall shear stress and LDA data illustrate the resulting multimode process of transition, which is responsible for the observed clocking effects. The optimum relative phase angle of the upstream wake and the downstream potential field can produce 0.25% of efficiency improvement through the reduction of the suction surface boundary layer loss. This reduction is mainly related to the calmed region and the laminar flow benefits that can be more effectively utilized than when only the upstream wakes are present. During the remaining parts of the cycle, the features that are usually associated with the wake and the potential field effects are still present.

1.
Curtis
,
E. M.
,
Hodson
,
H. P.
,
Banieghbal
,
M. R.
,
Howell
,
R. J.
, and
Harvey
,
N. W.
, 1997, “
Development of Blade Profiles for Low Pressure Turbine Applications
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
119
, pp.
531
538
.
2.
Binder
,
A.
,
Schröder
,
T.
, and
Hourmouziadis
,
J.
, 1989, “
Turbulence Measurements in a Multistage Low-Pressure Turbine
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
111
, pp.
153
161
.
3.
Halstead
,
D. E.
,
Wisler
,
D. C.
,
Okiishi
,
T. H.
,
Walker
,
G. J.
,
Hodson
,
H. P.
, and
Shin
,
H. W.
, 1997, “
Boundary Layer Development in Axial Compressors and Turbines, Part 3LP Turbines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
119
, pp.
225
237
.
4.
Solomon
,
W. J.
, 2000, “
Effects of Turbulence and Solidity on the Boundary Layer Development in a LPT
,” Paper No. 2000-GT-0273.
5.
Arnone
,
A.
,
Marconcini
,
M.
,
Pacciani
,
R.
,
Schipani
,
C.
, and
Spano
,
E.
, 2002, “
Numerical Investigation of Airfoil Clocking in a Three Stage LPT
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
124
, pp.
375
384
.
6.
Schröder
,
Th.
, 1991, “
Investigations of Bladerow Interaction and Boundary Layer Transition Phenomena in a Multistage Aeroengine Low Pressure Turbine by Measurements With Hot-film Probes and Surface-Mounted Hot-Film Gauges
,”
VKI Lecture Series No 9 Boundary Layers in Turbomachines
,
Von Karman Institute
.
7.
Arndt
,
N.
, 1993, “
Bladerow Interaction in a Multistage Low-Pressure Turbine
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
115
, pp
137
146
.
8.
Opoka
,
M. M.
,
Hodson
,
H. P.
, and
Thomas
,
R. L.
, 2006, “
Boundary Layer Transition on the High Lift T106A LP Turbine Blade With an Oscillating Downstream Pressure Field
,” ASME Paper No. GT2006-91038.
9.
Stieger
,
R.
,
Hollis
,
D.
, and
Hodson
,
H. P.
, 2004, “
Unsteady Surface Pressures Due to Wake Induced Transition in a Laminar Separation Bubble on a LP Turbine Cascade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
126
, pp.
544
550
.
10.
Antoranz
,
A.
, and
de la Calzada
,
P.
, 2002, “
Downstream Cylindrical Rods Design for Whittle Lab Low Velocity Cascade
,” ITP Internal Report in UTAT Project 13/05/02.
11.
Dring
,
R. P.
,
Joslyn
,
H. D.
,
Hardin
,
L. W.
, and
Wagner
,
J. H.
, 1982, “
Turbine Rotor-Stator Interaction
,”
ASME J. Eng. Power
0022-0825,
104
, pp.
729
742
.
12.
Roach
,
P. E.
, 1987, “
The Generation of Nearly Isotropic Turbulence by Means of Grids
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
0142-727X,
8
(
2
), pp.
82
92
.
13.
Hodson
,
H. P.
,
Huntsman
,
I.
, and
Steele
,
A. B.
, 1994, “
An Investigation of Boundary Layer Development in a Multistage LP Turbine
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
116
, pp.
375
383
.
14.
George
,
W. K.
, 1975, “
Limitations to Measuring Accuracy Inherent in the Laser-Doppler Signal
,” (A76–45326 23–35)
Proceedings LDA-Symposium Copenhagen
,
Skovlunde, Denmark
, pp.
20
63
.
15.
Stieger
,
R.
, and
Hodson
,
H. P.
, 2004, “
The Transition Mechanism of Highly Loaded LP Turbine Blade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
126
, pp.
536
543
.
16.
Opoka
,
M. M.
, and
Hodson
,
H. P.
, 2005, “
An Experimental Investigation on the Unsteady Transition Process on the High Lift T106A Turbine Blade
,” Paper No 1277.
17.
Denton
,
J. D.
, 1993, “
The 1993 IGTI Scholar Lecture Loss Mechanisms in Turbomachines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
115
, pp.
621
656
.
18.
Hatman
,
A.
, and
Wang
,
T.
, 1998, “
Separated-Flow Transition, Part 3-Primary Modes and Vortex Dynamics
,” ASME Paper No. 98-GT-463.
You do not currently have access to this content.