Turbines operating at high pressure in high velocity flow are susceptible to flutter. As reduced frequencies become sufficiently low, negative aerodynamic damping will be found in some modes. Ensuring that the total system damping is positive over the entire turbine operating envelope for all modes is of utmost importance in any design since flutter in a turbine often causes blade failures. This is in contrast to the normal engineering approach, which is to require a positive aerodynamic damping. A unique test campaign with a 1.5 stage supersonic space turbine has been performed. The turbine was operated at simulated running conditions over a large operating envelope in order to map out flutter limits. During the test, flutter was intentionally triggered at seven different operating conditions. Unique data have been obtained during the test that supports validation of design tools and enables better understanding of flutter in this type of turbine. Based on the data the flutter boundary for the turbine could be established. Using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tools flutter was predicted at all operating points where the flutter limit was crossed. Both in predictions and as evidenced in test the two nodal diameter backward traveling mode was the most unstable. In addition to this predicted values of aerodynamic damping at flutter agreed well with damping estimated from measured amplitude growth.

1.
Mårtensson
,
H.
, 2006, “
Flutter Free Design of Aerodynamically Unstable Supersonic Turbines
,”
42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit
, Sacramento, CA, July 9–12.
2.
Lindström
,
D.
, and
Mårtensson
,
H.
, 2001, “
A Method for Flutter Calculations Based on the Linearized Compressible Euler Equations
,”
Proceedings of IFASD Conference
, Vol.
II
.
3.
Groth
,
P.
,
Mårtensson
,
H.
, and
Eriksson
,
L. -E.
, 1996, “
Validation of a 4D Finite Volume Method for Blade Flutter
,” ASME Paper No. 96-GT-429.
4.
Bölcs
,
A.
, and
Fransson
,
T. H.
, 1986, “
Aeroelasticity in Turbomachines Comparison of Theoretical and Experimental Cascade Results
,”
Communication du Laboratoire de termique appliqueé et de turbomachines
, No. 13,
EPFL
, Lausanne, Switzerland.
5.
Vogt
,
D.
, 2005, “
Experimental Investigation of Three-Dimensional Mechanisms in Low-Pressure Turbine Flutter
,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Heat and Power Technology, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
6.
Eriksson
,
L. -E.
, 1990, “
A Third Order Accurate Upwind-Biased Finite Volume Scheme for Unsteady Compressible Flow
,” Volvo Aero Corporation, VFA Report No. 9370-154.
7.
Larsson
,
J.
, 1998, “
Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Flows for Turbine Blade Heat Transfer Applications
,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Thermo and Fluid Dynamics, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.
8.
Giles
,
M.
, 1988, “
Non-Reflecting Boundary Conditions for the Euler Equations
,” MIT Computational Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Technical Report No. TR-88-1.
9.
Hall
,
K.
, and
Crawley
,
E. F.
, 1989, “
Calculation of the Unsteady Flow in Turbomachinery Using the Linearized Euler Equations
,”
AIAA J.
,
27
(
6
), pp.
777
787
. 0001-1452
10.
Holmes
,
D. G.
, and
Chuang
,
H. A.
, 1991, “
2D Linearized Harmonic Euler Flow Analysis for Flutter and Forced Response
,”
Unsteady Aerodynamics, Aeroacoustics and Aeroelasticity of Turbomachines and Propellers
,
Springer
,
New York
, pp.
213
230
.
11.
Hall
,
K.
, and
Clark
,
W. S.
, 1993, “
Linearized Euler Prediction of Unsteady Aerodynamic Loads in Cascades
,”
AIAA J.
,
31
(
3
), pp.
540
550
. 0001-1452
You do not currently have access to this content.