Experimental, analytical, and numerical methods have been employed to study the aerodynamic performance of four different cooled tips with coolant mass ratios between 0% and 1.2% at three tip gaps of 1%, 1.6%, and 2.2% of the chord. The four cooled tips are two flat tips with different coolant holes, a cooled suction side squealer tip and a cooled cavity tip. Each tip has ten coolant holes with the same diameter. The uncooled cavity tip produces the smallest loss among all uncooled tips. On the cooled flat tip, the coolant is injected normally into the tip gap and mixes directly with flow inside the tip gap. The momentum exchange between the coolant and the flow that enters the tip gap creates significant blockage. As the coolant mass flow ratio increases, the tip leakage loss of the cooled flat tip first decreases and then increases. For the cooled cavity tip, the blockage effect of the coolant is not as big as that on the cooled flat tip. This is because after the coolant exits the coolant holes, it mixes with flow in the cavity first and then mixes with tip flow in the tip gap. The tip leakage loss of the cooled cavity tip increases as the coolant mass flow ratio increase. As a result, at a tip gap of 1.6% of the chord, the cooled cavity tip gives the lowest loss. At the smallest tip gap of 1% of the chord, the cooled flat tip produces less loss than the cooled cavity tip when the coolant mass flow ratios larger than 0.23%. This is because with the same coolant mass flow ratio, a proportionally larger blockage is created at the smallest tip gap. At the largest tip gap of 2.2% of the chord, the cavity tip achieves the best aerodynamic performance. This is because the effect of the coolant is reduced and the benefits of the cavity tip geometry dominate. At a coolant mass flow ratio of 0.55%, the cooled flat tips produce a lower loss than the cavity tip at tip gaps less than 1.3% of the chord. The cooled cavity tip produces the least loss for tip gaps larger than 1.3% of the chord. The cooled suction side squealer has the worst aerodynamic performance for all tip gaps studied.

1.
Denton
,
J. D.
, 1993, “
Loss Mechanisms in Turbomachines
,” ASME Paper No. 93-GT-435.
2.
Booth
,
T. C.
,
Dodge
,
P. R.
, and
Hepworth
,
H. K.
, 1981, “
Rotor-Tip Leakage Part I—Basic Methodology
,” ASME Paper No. 81-GT-71.
3.
Heyes
,
F. J. G.
,
Hodson
,
H. P.
, and
Dailey
,
G. M.
, 1992, “
The Effect of Blade Tip Geometry on the Tip Leakage Flow in Axial Turbine
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
114
, pp.
643
651
.
4.
Kim
,
Y. W.
,
Downs
,
J. P.
,
Soechting
,
F. O.
,
Abedel-Messeh
,
W.
,
Steuber
,
G. D.
, and
Tanrikut
,
S.
, 1995, “
A Summary of the Cooled Turbine Blade Tip Heat Transfer and Film Effectiveness Investigations Performed by Dr. D. E. Metzger
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
117
, pp.
1
11
.
5.
Newton
,
P. J.
,
Lock
,
G. D.
,
Krishnababu
,
S. K.
,
Hodson
,
H. P.
,
Dawes
,
W. N.
,
Hannis
,
J.
, and
Whitney
,
C.
, 2007, “
Aero-Thermal Investigation of Tip Leakage Flow in Axial Flow Turbines Part III-Film Cooling
,” ASME Paper No. GT-2007-27368.
6.
Kwak
,
J. S.
, and
Han
,
J. C.
, 2003, “
Heat Transfer Coefficients and Film Cooling Effectiveness on the Squealer Tip of a Gas Turbine Blade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
125
, pp.
648
656
.
7.
Hohlfeld
,
E. M.
,
Christophel
,
J. R.
,
Couch
,
E. L.
, and
Thole
,
K. A.
, 2003, “
Predictions of Cooling From Dirt Purge Holes Along the Tip of a Turbine Blade
,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38251.
8.
Couch
,
E.
,
Christophel
,
J.
,
Hohlfeld
,
E.
,
Thole
,
K. A.
, and
Cunha
,
F. J.
, 2005, “
Comparisons of Measurements and Prediction for Blowing From a Turbine Blade Tip
,”
J. Propul. Power
0748-4658,
21
(
2
), pp.
335
343
.
9.
Chen
,
G.
,
Dawes
,
W. N.
, and
Hodson
,
H. P.
, 1993, “
A Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Turbine Tip Gap Flow
,”
AIAA 93-2253, AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE, 29th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit
, Monterey, CA, June 28–30.
10.
Dey
,
D.
, 2001, “
Tip Desensitization in an Axial Flow Turbine
,” Ph.D. thesis, Pennsylvania State University.
11.
Rao
N.
, and
Camci
,
C.
, 2004, “
Axial Flow Turbine Tip Desensitization by Injection From a Tip Trench. Part 1-Effect of Injection Mass Flow Rate
,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-53256.
12.
Rao
,
N.
, and
Camci
,
C.
, 2004, “
Axial Flow Turbine Tip Desensitization by Injection From a Tip Trench. Part 2-Leakage Flow Sensitivity to Injection Location
,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-53258.
13.
Heyes
,
F. J. G.
, and
Hodson
,
H. P.
, 1993, “
Measurement and Prediction of Tip Clearance Flow in Linear Turbine Cascades
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
115
, pp.
376
382
.
14.
Newton
,
P. J.
,
Lock
,
G. D.
,
Krishnababu
,
S. K.
,
Hodson
,
H. P.
,
Dawes
,
W. N.
,
Hannis
,
J.
, and
Whitney
,
C.
, 2006, “
Heat Transfer and Aerodynamics of Turbine Blade Tips in a Linear Cascade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
128
, pp.
300
309
.
15.
Dominy
,
R. G.
, and
Hodson
,
H. P.
, 1992, “
An Investigation of Factors Influencing the Calibration of 5-Hole Probes for 3-D Flow Measurements
,” ASME Paper No. 92-GT-216.
16.
Schabowski
,
Z.
, and
Hodson
,
H.
, 2007, “
The Reduction of Over Tip Leakage Loss in Unshrouded Axial Turbines Using Winglet and Squealers
,” ASME Paper No. GT2007-27623.
17.
Bindon
,
J. P.
, and
Morphis
,
G.
, 1992, “
The Development of Axial Turbine Leakage Loss for Two Profiled Tip Geometries Using Linear Cascade Data
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
114
, pp.
198
203
.
18.
Hartsel
,
J. E.
, 1972, “
Prediction of Effects of Mass-Transfer Cooling on the Blade-Row Efficiency of Turbine Airfoils
,”
AIAA Tenth Aerospace Sciences Meeting
.
19.
Dishart
,
P. T.
, and
Moore
,
J.
, 1990, “
Tip Leakage Losses in a Linear Turbine Cascade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
112
, pp.
599
608
.
You do not currently have access to this content.