Numerical optimizations are very useful in liner designs for low-noise aeroengines. Although modern computational tools are already very efficient for a single aeroengine noise propagation simulation run, the prohibitively high computational cost of a broadband liner optimization process which requires hundreds of thousands of runs renders these tools unsuitable for such task. To enable rapid optimization using a desktop computer, an efficient analytical solver based on the Wiener–Hopf method is proposed in the current study. Although a Wiener–Hopf-based solver can produce predictions very quickly (order of a second), it usually assumes an idealized straight duct configuration with a uniform background flow that makes it arguable for practical applications. In the current study, we employ the Wiener–Hopf method in our solver to produce an optimized liner design for a semi-infinite annular duct setup and compare its noise-reduction effect with an optimized liner designed by the direct application of a numerical finite element solver for a practical aeroengine intake configuration with an inhomogeneous background flow. The near-identical near- and far-field solutions by the Wiener–Hopf-based method and the finite element solvers clearly demonstrate the accuracy and high efficiency of the proposed optimization strategy. Therefore, the current Wiener–Hopf solver is highly effective for liner optimizations with practical setups and is very useful to the preliminary design process of low-noise aeroengines.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
June 2018
Technical Briefs
Surrogate Model Based Liner Optimization for Aeroengines and Comparison With Finite Elements
Hanbo Jiang,
Hanbo Jiang
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
The Hong Kong University of Science and
Technology Clear Water Bay,
Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong, China
e-mail: hb.jiang@connect.ust.hk
The Hong Kong University of Science and
Technology Clear Water Bay,
Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong, China
e-mail: hb.jiang@connect.ust.hk
Search for other works by this author on:
Alex Siu Hong Lau,
Alex Siu Hong Lau
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
The Hong Kong University of Science and
Technology Clear Water Bay,
Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong, China
e-mail: alexshlau@ust.hk
The Hong Kong University of Science and
Technology Clear Water Bay,
Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong, China
e-mail: alexshlau@ust.hk
Search for other works by this author on:
Xun Huang
Xun Huang
State Key Laboratory of Turbulence and Complex System,
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics,
College of Engineering Peking University,
Beijing 100871, China;
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics,
College of Engineering Peking University,
Beijing 100871, China;
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
The Hong Kong University of Science and
Technology Clear Water Bay,
Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong, China
e-mails: huangxun@pku.edu.cn; huangxun@ust.hk
The Hong Kong University of Science and
Technology Clear Water Bay,
Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong, China
e-mails: huangxun@pku.edu.cn; huangxun@ust.hk
Search for other works by this author on:
Hanbo Jiang
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
The Hong Kong University of Science and
Technology Clear Water Bay,
Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong, China
e-mail: hb.jiang@connect.ust.hk
The Hong Kong University of Science and
Technology Clear Water Bay,
Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong, China
e-mail: hb.jiang@connect.ust.hk
Alex Siu Hong Lau
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
The Hong Kong University of Science and
Technology Clear Water Bay,
Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong, China
e-mail: alexshlau@ust.hk
The Hong Kong University of Science and
Technology Clear Water Bay,
Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong, China
e-mail: alexshlau@ust.hk
Xun Huang
State Key Laboratory of Turbulence and Complex System,
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics,
College of Engineering Peking University,
Beijing 100871, China;
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics,
College of Engineering Peking University,
Beijing 100871, China;
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
The Hong Kong University of Science and
Technology Clear Water Bay,
Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong, China
e-mails: huangxun@pku.edu.cn; huangxun@ust.hk
The Hong Kong University of Science and
Technology Clear Water Bay,
Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong, China
e-mails: huangxun@pku.edu.cn; huangxun@ust.hk
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Noise Control and Acoustics Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS. Manuscript received June 9, 2017; final manuscript received September 25, 2017; published online January 25, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Sheryl M. Grace.
J. Vib. Acoust. Jun 2018, 140(3): 034501 (8 pages)
Published Online: January 25, 2018
Article history
Received:
June 9, 2017
Revised:
September 25, 2017
Citation
Jiang, H., Siu Hong Lau, A., and Huang, X. (January 25, 2018). "Surrogate Model Based Liner Optimization for Aeroengines and Comparison With Finite Elements." ASME. J. Vib. Acoust. June 2018; 140(3): 034501. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038680
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Related Articles
Trailing Edge Perforation for Interaction Tonal Noise Reduction of a Contra-Rotating Fan
J. Vib. Acoust (April,2018)
Reduction of Jet Impingement Noise by Addition of Swirl
J. Vib. Acoust (December,2016)
Numerical Investigation of the Air Pumping Noise Generation Mechanism in Tire Grooves
J. Vib. Acoust (October,2016)
Spinning Wave Scattering From a Flow Pipe With Serrations
J. Vib. Acoust (August,2021)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Toward More Effective Evaluation and Control of Airport Noise
Community Noise
Fluidelastic Instability of Tube Bundles in Single-Phase Flow
Flow-Induced Vibration Handbook for Nuclear and Process Equipment
Lessons Learned: NRC Experience
Continuing and Changing Priorities of the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes and Standards