The equivalent source method (ESM) and monopole time reversal method (MTRM) are two popular techniques for noise source localization. These two methods have some similar characteristics, such as using the pressure field measured by a microphone array as the input and using similar propagation matrices obtained from the Green's function. However, the spatial resolutions of results obtained by these two methods are different. The aim of this paper is to reveal the reason resulting in this difference from a theoretical analysis and compare the performance of these two methods using results from numerical simulations and experiments. Using the singular value decomposition (SVD) technique, the difference between the two methods is found to be only the diagonal matrices of singular values, and the two methods are equivalent after simply replacing the diagonal matrix in the MTRM with its inverse. Comparison of the results demonstrates that the ESM can calculate the real source strength and obtain a high spatial resolution due to the significant amplification of evanescent waves in the inverse process. However, it does not work when the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is low or the measurement distance is large. The performance of ESM under these situations can be significantly improved by introducing a regularization procedure. While the MTRM fails to calculate the real source strength and locate the source at low frequencies due to the loss of information of evanescent waves, it works well at high frequencies even with a low SNR and a large measurement distance.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
December 2018
Research-Article
A Comparison of Equivalent Source Method and Monopole Time Reversal Method for Noise Source Localization
Chuan-Xing Bi,
Chuan-Xing Bi
Institute of Sound and Vibration Research,
Hefei University of Technology,
193 Tunxi Road,
Hefei 230009, China
e-mail: cxbi@hfut.edu.cn
Hefei University of Technology,
193 Tunxi Road,
Hefei 230009, China
e-mail: cxbi@hfut.edu.cn
Search for other works by this author on:
Yong-Chang Li,
Yong-Chang Li
Institute of Sound and Vibration Research,
Hefei University of Technology,
193 Tunxi Road,
Hefei 230009, China
e-mail: lyc19490@163.com
Hefei University of Technology,
193 Tunxi Road,
Hefei 230009, China
e-mail: lyc19490@163.com
Search for other works by this author on:
Rong Zhou,
Rong Zhou
School of Mechanical Engineering,
Hefei University of Technology,
193 Tunxi Road,
Hefei 230009, China
e-mail: zhourong2015@hfut.edu.cn
Hefei University of Technology,
193 Tunxi Road,
Hefei 230009, China
e-mail: zhourong2015@hfut.edu.cn
Search for other works by this author on:
Yong-Bin Zhang
Yong-Bin Zhang
Institute of Sound and Vibration Research,
Hefei University of Technology,
193 Tunxi Road,
Hefei 230009, China
e-mail: ybzhang@hfut.edu.cn
Hefei University of Technology,
193 Tunxi Road,
Hefei 230009, China
e-mail: ybzhang@hfut.edu.cn
Search for other works by this author on:
Chuan-Xing Bi
Institute of Sound and Vibration Research,
Hefei University of Technology,
193 Tunxi Road,
Hefei 230009, China
e-mail: cxbi@hfut.edu.cn
Hefei University of Technology,
193 Tunxi Road,
Hefei 230009, China
e-mail: cxbi@hfut.edu.cn
Yong-Chang Li
Institute of Sound and Vibration Research,
Hefei University of Technology,
193 Tunxi Road,
Hefei 230009, China
e-mail: lyc19490@163.com
Hefei University of Technology,
193 Tunxi Road,
Hefei 230009, China
e-mail: lyc19490@163.com
Rong Zhou
School of Mechanical Engineering,
Hefei University of Technology,
193 Tunxi Road,
Hefei 230009, China
e-mail: zhourong2015@hfut.edu.cn
Hefei University of Technology,
193 Tunxi Road,
Hefei 230009, China
e-mail: zhourong2015@hfut.edu.cn
Yong-Bin Zhang
Institute of Sound and Vibration Research,
Hefei University of Technology,
193 Tunxi Road,
Hefei 230009, China
e-mail: ybzhang@hfut.edu.cn
Hefei University of Technology,
193 Tunxi Road,
Hefei 230009, China
e-mail: ybzhang@hfut.edu.cn
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Noise Control and Acoustics Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS. Manuscript received January 18, 2018; final manuscript received April 19, 2018; published online May 17, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Nicole Kessissoglou.
J. Vib. Acoust. Dec 2018, 140(6): 061011 (9 pages)
Published Online: May 17, 2018
Article history
Received:
January 18, 2018
Revised:
April 19, 2018
Citation
Bi, C., Li, Y., Zhou, R., and Zhang, Y. (May 17, 2018). "A Comparison of Equivalent Source Method and Monopole Time Reversal Method for Noise Source Localization." ASME. J. Vib. Acoust. December 2018; 140(6): 061011. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040047
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Related Articles
Fully Coupled Finite-Element Modeling of Active Sandwich Panels With Poroelastic Core
J. Vib. Acoust (April,2012)
Denoising Weighting Beamforming Method Applied to Sound Source Localization With Airflow Using Microphone Array
J. Vib. Acoust (December,2018)
Analytical Passive Time Reversal Method Combined With Equivalent Source Method for Sound Source Localization in an Enclosure
J. Vib. Acoust (June,2019)
Modeling and Dynamic Analysis of an Electrical Helmholtz Resonator for Active Control of Resonant Noise
J. Vib. Acoust (October,2017)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Toward More Effective Evaluation and Control of Airport Noise
Community Noise
Multiple Smoothing and Morphological Techniques in Radiographic Image Enhancement
International Conference on Computer Engineering and Technology, 3rd (ICCET 2011)
Accelerate the Colorization of Grayscale Video Based on CUDA
International Conference on Computer Technology and Development, 3rd (ICCTD 2011)